Clinical trial NCT00816530 - References

Breast Cancer — A Clinical Study to Evaluate Somo•v and Digital Mammography Together as a Breast Cancer Screening Method, Compared to Digital Mammography Alone, in Women With Dense Breasts.

Citation(s)

•   Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS, Boparai K; ACRIN 6666 Investigators
  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151. Erratum in: JAMA. 2010 Apr 21;303(15):1482.
•   Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL; ACRIN 6666 Investigators
  Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):693-702. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
•   Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB
  Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):355-65.
•   Bick U, Diekmann F
  Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):1931-42. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Review.
•   Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ
  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 18;356(3):227-36.
•   Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S
  Mammographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancer. J Br Menopause Soc. 2006 Dec;12(4):186-93. Review.
•   Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, Inciardi MF, Guingrich JA, Hashimoto BE, Lander MR, Lapidus RL, Peterson MK, Rapelyea JA, Roux S, Schilling KJ, Shah BA, Torrente J, Wynn RT, Miller DP
  Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional
•   Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dünser M
  Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Oct;173(4):921-7.
•   Chen SP, Tiu CM, Chiang HR
  Interpretation of Tomographic Vu in conjunction with standard Ultrasound Vu on Automated Breast Ultrasound System Study. Annual Meeting of the Asian Breast Disease Associates 2006; Chiang Mai, Thailand.
•   Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Brown ME, Feig SA, Jong RA, Maidment AD, Staiger MJ, Kuzmiak CM, Freimanis RI, Lesko N, Rosen EL, Walsh R, Williford M, Braeuning MP
  Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):153-60.
•   Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, Bergonzini R, Bellarosa S, Angelini O, Bani C, Ciatto S
  Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med. 2006 Apr;111(3):440-8. Epub 2006 Apr 11. English, Italian.
•   Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ
  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;181(1):177-82.
•   Destounis S, Young W, Murphy P, Somerville P, Seifert P, Zuley M
  Initial experience of ABUS screening trial in the setting of a community based private practice (Abst.). RSNA 2006 Scientific Session.
•   Duffy SW, Smith RA, Gabe R, Tabár L, Yen AM, Chen TH
  Screening for breast cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;14(4):671-97. Review.
•   Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen MF, Abdsalah S, Epstein B, Frodis E, Ljungberg E, Hedborg-Melander C, Sundbom A, Tholin M, Wiege M, Akerlund A, Wu HM, Tung TS, Chiu YH, Chiu CP, Huang CC, Smith RA, Rosén M, Stenbeck M, Holmberg L
  The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer. 2002 Aug 1;95(3):458-69.
•   Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen THH, Smith RA, Hdmberg L, Jonsson H, Lenner P, Nyström L, Tönberg S, Frisell J, Yen AMF, Chen LS, Chiu YH, Wu CY, Wu HM, Huang CC, Warwick J, Kennetli L, Chou P
  Effect of mammographic service screening on stage at presentation of breast cancers in Sweden. Cancer 2007; 109(11): 2205-2212.
•   Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen THH, Smith RA, Hdmberg L, Jonsson H, Lenner P, Nyström L, Tönberg S, Frisell J, Yen AMF, Chen LS, Chiu YH, Wu CY, Wu HM, Huang CC, Warwick J, Kennetli L, Chou P
  Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15(1): 45-51.
•   Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen THH, Smith RA, Hdmberg L, Jonsson H, Lenner P, Nyström L, Tönberg S, Frisell J, Yen AMF, Chen LS, Chiu YH, Wu CY, Wu HM, Huang CC, Warwick J, Kennetli L, Chou P
  Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 2. Validation with alternative analytic methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15(1) 52-56.
•   Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, Yen MF, Warwick J, Smith RA, Chen HH
  The Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening: cluster randomisation and end point evaluation. Ann Oncol. 2003 Aug;14(8):1196-8.
•   Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW
  Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56. Review.
•   Glide C, Duric N, Littrup P
  Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography. Med Phys. 2007 Feb;34(2):744-53.
•   Guingrich JA
  The use of 3-D ultrasound images for the identification and diagnosis of breast cancer (Abst.). RSNA 2007 Scientific Session.
•   Hakama M, Pukkala E, Heikkilä M, Kallio M
  Effectiveness of the public health policy for breast cancer screening in Finland: population based cohort study. BMJ. 1997 Mar 22;314(7084):864-7.
•   Houssami N, Irwig L, Ciatto S
  Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Mar;7(3):259-65. Review.
•   Kaplan SS
  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001 Dec;221(3):641-9.
•   Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH
  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75.
•   Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH
  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998 Apr;207(1):191-9.
•   Kolb TM
  Breast US for screening, diagnosing, and staging breast cancer: issues and controversies. RSNA Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics: Advances in Breast Imaging-Physics, Technology, and Clinical Applications 2004; pp247-257.
•   Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E
  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 5;92(13):1081-7.
•   Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Wyatt J, Weber G, Moore R, Halpern E, Kopans DB, Hughes K
  Predicting the survival of patients with breast carcinoma using tumor size. Cancer. 2002 Aug 15;95(4):713-23.
•   O'Driscoll D, Warren R, MacKay J, Britton P, Day NE
  Screening with breast ultrasound in a population at moderate risk due to family history. J Med Screen. 2001;8(2):106-9.
•   Paci E, Duffy SW, Giorgi D, Zappa M, Crocetti E, Vezzosi V, Bianchi S, del Turco MR
  Quantification of the effect of mammographic screening on fatal breast cancers: The Florence Programme 1990-96. Br J Cancer. 2002 Jul 1;87(1):65-9.
•   Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group
  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. Epub 2005 Sep 16. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 26;355(17):1840.
•   Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, Helvie MA
  Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology. 2004 Jan;230(1):42-8.
•   Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH
  The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 Sep;42(5):793-806, v. Review.
•   Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Cawson JN, Hegele RA, Chiarelli AM, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF, Hopper JL
  The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Apr;15(4):612-7.
•   Tabár L, Duffy SW, Vitak B, Chen HH, Prevost TC
  The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer. 1999 Aug 1;86(3):449-62.
•   Tabar L, Duffy SW, Yen MF, Warwick J, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA
  All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an end point. J Med Screen. 2002;9(4):159-62.
•   Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Duffy SW, Yen MF, Chiang CF, Krusemo UB, Tot T, Smith RA
  The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):625-51.
•   Titus-Ernstoff L, Tosteson AN, Kasales C, Weiss J, Goodrich M, Hatch EE, Carney PA
  Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Dec;17(10):1281-90.
•   Torres-Mejía G, De Stavola B, Allen DS, Pérez-Gavilán JJ, Ferreira JM, Fentiman IS, Dos Santos Silva I
  Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1052-9.
•   Ursin G, Hovanessian-Larsen L, Parisky YR, Pike MC, Wu AH
  Greatly increased occurrence of breast cancers in areas of mammographically dense tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(5):R605-8. Epub 2005 Jun 8.
•   Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Im JG
  Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):104-11. Epub 2007 May 16.
•   Yang WT, Lai CJ, Whitman GJ, Murphy WA Jr, Dryden MJ, Kushwaha AC, Sahin AA, Johnston D, Dempsey PJ, Shaw CC
  Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):W576-81.

A Prospective Multicenter Matched-pair Clinical Study to Evaluate the Sensitivity and Specificity of ABUS and Digital X-Ray Mammography (XRM) Together as a Breast Cancer Screening Method Compared to XRM Alone in Women With >50% Parenchymal Density.

Details for clinical trial NCT00816530