Bjerrum F, Thomsen ASS, Nayahangan LJ, Konge L Surgical simulation: Current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training. Med Teach. 2018 Jul;40(7):668-675. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1472754. Epub 2018 Jun 17. Review.
Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R, Brydges R What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 May;19(2):233-50. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9458-4. Epub 2013 May 2. Review.
Cook DA Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Med Teach. 2010;32(4):296-301. doi: 10.3109/01421590903480121.
Ericsson KA Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: a perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11):1471-86. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000939.
Feltz DL, Landers DM The Effects of Mental Practice on Motor Skill Learning and Performance: A Meta-analysis. J Sport Psychol. 1983 Mar;5(1):25-57.
Holmes PS, Collins DJ The PETTLEP Approach to Motor Imagery: A Functional Equivalence Model for Sport Psychologists. J Appl Sport Psyholgy. 2001;13(1):60-83.
Knol MJ, Pestman WR, Grobbee DE The (mis)use of overlap of confidence intervals to assess effect modification. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;26(4):253-4. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9563-8. Epub 2011 Mar 19.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):375-85. doi: 10.1111/medu.12391. Review.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):706-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119. Review.
Olsson CJ, Jonsson B, Larsson A, Nyberg L Motor representations and practice affect brain systems underlying imagery: an FMRI study of internal imagery in novices and active high jumpers. Open Neuroimag J. 2008;2:5-13. doi: 10.2174/1874440000802010005. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
Schout BM, Bemelmans BL, Martens EJ, Scherpbier AJ, Hendrikx AJ How useful and realistic is the uro trainer for training transurethral prostate and bladder tumor resection procedures? J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1297-303; discussion 1303. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.169. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
Thomas MR, Beckman TJ, Mauck KF, Cha SS, Thomas KG Group assessments of resident physicians improve reliability and decrease halo error. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):759-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1670-4. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
Woehr DJ, Huffcutt AI Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1994 Sep;67(3):189-205.
Zevin B, Levy JS, Satava RM, Grantcharov TP A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Oct;215(4):580-586.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.035. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Effect of Motor-imagery in Simulator-based Training in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors - a Randomized Trial
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.