Clinical trial NCT04328051 - References

Bacterial Infections — Influence of the Implant-prosthetic Connection in the Marginal Bone Loss and Bacterial Leakage

Citation(s)

•   Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T
  Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x. Review.
•   Albrektsson T, Donos N; Working Group 1
  Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:63-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02557.x. Review.
•   Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR
  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 Summer;1(1):11-25. Review.
•   Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H
  Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):413-20.
•   Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A
  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100.
•   Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC
  Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Apr;22(2):109-17.
•   Derks J, Tomasi C
  Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S158-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12334. Review.
•   Isidor F
  Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:8-18. Review.
•   Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Seol YJ, Han JS, Kim TI, Lee YM, Ku Y, Wikesjö UM, Rhyu IC
  The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol. 2012 Sep;83(9):1104-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110456. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
•   Lin MI, Shen YW, Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ
  A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):202S-7S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513510322. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
•   Malevez C, Hermans M, Daelemans P
  Marginal bone levels at Brånemark system implants used for single tooth restoration. The influence of implant design and anatomical region. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Jun;7(2):162-9.
•   Nishioka RS, de Vasconcellos LG, de Melo Nishioka GN
  Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon, Morse taper, and influence of straight and offset implant configuration. Implant Dent. 2011 Apr;20(2):e24-32. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318211fce8.
•   Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL
  The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002 Mar;73(3):322-33. Review.
•   Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D
  Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 Sep;3(3):104-11.
•   Vidyasagar L, Apse P
  Dental implant design and biological effects on bone implant interface. Baltic Dent Maxillofac J. 2004;6:51-4.

Influence of the Implant-prosthetic Connection in the Marginal Bone Loss and Bacterial Leakage. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT04328051