Appendicitis — Single Incision Versus Conventional 3-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Citation(s)
Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e858
Adair J, Gromski MA, Nagle D Single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and rectopexy case series. Am J Surg. 2011 Aug;202(2):243-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.034.
Agha A, Hornung M, Iesalnieks I, Glockzin G, Schlitt HJ Single-incision retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and single-incision laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Endourol. 2010 Nov;24(11):1765-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0238. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
Andersson M, Andersson RE The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y. Erratum in: World J Surg. 201
Lin YY, Shabbir A, So JB Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jan;24(1):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0691-0.
McKernan JB, Champion JK Access techniques: Veress needle--initial blind trocar insertion versus open laparoscopy with the Hasson trocar. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995 Feb;3(1):35-8. Review.
Meinke AK, Kossuth T What is the learning curve for laparoscopic appendectomy? Surg Endosc. 1994 May;8(5):371-5; discussion 376.
Raakow R, Jacob DA Single-Incision Cholecystectomy in about 200 Patients. Minim Invasive Surg. 2011;2011:915735. doi: 10.1155/2011/915735. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Wong SK, Lai PB, Ng EK A case-controlled comparison of single-site access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1415-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1406-2. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
Single Incision Versus Conventional 3-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Trial
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
