Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Baurain MJ, Hoton F, D'Hollander AA, Cantraine FR
    Is recovery of neuromuscular transmission complete after the use of neostigmine to antagonize block produced by rocuronium, vecuronium, atracurium and pancuronium? Br J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;77(4):496-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.496.
  •   Chung F, Chan VW, Ong D
    A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Sep;7(6):500-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00130-a.
  •   Debaene B, Frasca D, Moreillon F, D'Hollander AA
    100 Hz-5 s tetanic stimulation to illustrate the presence of "residual paralysis" co-existing with accelerometric 0.90 train-of-four ratio-A proof-of-concept study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Aug;40(4):100903. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100903. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
  •   Dubois PE, Mitchell J, Regnier M, Passeraub PA, Moreillon F, d'Hollander AA
    The interest of 100 versus 200 Hz tetanic stimulations to quantify low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade with mechanomyography: a pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Aug;36(4):1131-1137. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00745-6. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
  •   Feldman S, Karalliedde L
    Drug interactions with neuromuscular blockers. Drug Saf. 1996 Oct;15(4):261-73. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615040-00004.
  •   Gage PW
    Ion channels and postsynaptic potentials. Biophys Chem. 1988 Feb;29(1-2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(88)87028-5.
  •   Karis JH, Gissen AJ, Nastuk WL
    The effect of volatile anesthetic agents on neuromuscular transmission. Anesthesiology. 1967 Jan-Feb;28(1):128-34. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196701000-00014. No abstract available.
  •   Ochiai R, Guthrie RD, Motoyama EK
    Differential sensitivity to halothane anesthesia of the genioglossus, intercostals, and diaphragm in kittens. Anesth Analg. 1992 Mar;74(3):338-44. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199203000-00004.
  •   Ochiai R, Guthrie RD, Motoyama EK
    Effects of varying concentrations of halothane on the activity of the genioglossus, intercostals, and diaphragm in cats: an electromyographic study. Anesthesiology. 1989 May;70(5):812-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198905000-00018.
  •   Pereda AE, Faber DS
    Activity-dependent short-term enhancement of intercellular coupling. J Neurosci. 1996 Feb 1;16(3):983-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-00983.1996.
  •   Raines DE
    Anesthetic and nonanesthetic halogenated volatile compounds have dissimilar activities on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization kinetics. Anesthesiology. 1996 Mar;84(3):663-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199603000-00022.
  •   Silverman DG, Brull SJ
    The effect of a tetanic stimulus on the response to subsequent tetanic stimulation. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jun;76(6):1284-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199376060-00017.
  •   Simons JC, Pierce E, Diaz-Gil D, Malviya SA, Meyer MJ, Timm FP, Stokholm JB, Rosow CE, Kacmarek RM, Eikermann M
    Effects of Depth of Propofol and Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Upper Airway Collapsibility, Respiratory Genioglossus Activation, and Breathing in Healthy Volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2016 Sep;125(3):525-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001225.
  •   Stauble CG, Stauble RB, Schaller SJ, Unterbuchner C, Fink H, Blobner M
    Effects of single-shot and steady-state propofol anaesthesia on rocuronium dose-response relationship: a randomised trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):902-11. doi: 10.1111/aas.12523. Epub 2015 May 12.
  •   Tassonyi E, Charpantier E, Muller D, Dumont L, Bertrand D
    The role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the mechanisms of anesthesia. Brain Res Bull. 2002 Jan 15;57(2):133-50. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00740-7.
  •   Yamaoka K, Vogel SM, Seyama I
    Na+ channel pharmacology and molecular mechanisms of gating. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12(4):429-42. doi: 10.2174/138161206775474468.

Influence of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Maximum Muscular Strength, Speed of Contraction and Relaxation, in Humans: A Pilot Study

Details for clinical trial NCT05615025