Amputees — Effectivity of Motor Imagery and MirrorTherapy in Amputees
Citation(s)
Beaumont G, Mercier C, Michon PE, Malouin F, Jackson PL Decreasing phantom limb pain through observation of action and imagery: a case series. Pain Med. 2011 Feb;12(2):289-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01048.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
Berthelot JM Current management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (complex regional pain syndrome type I). Joint Bone Spine. 2006 Oct;73(5):495-9. Epub 2006 Jun 30. Review.
Brodie EE, Whyte A, Niven CA Analgesia through the looking-glass? A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of viewing a 'virtual' limb upon phantom limb pain, sensation and movement. Eur J Pain. 2007 May;11(4):428-36. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
Brodie EE, Whyte A, Waller B Increased motor control of a phantom leg in humans results from the visual feedback of a virtual leg. Neurosci Lett. 2003 May 1;341(2):167-9.
Casale R, Alaa L, Mallick M, Ring H Phantom limb related phenomena and their rehabilitation after lower limb amputation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Dec;45(4):559-66. Epub 2009 Feb 26. Review.
Daly AE, Bialocerkowski AE Does evidence support physiotherapy management of adult Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type One? A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2009 Apr;13(4):339-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jul 10. Review.
Dickstein R, Deutsch JE Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2007 Jul;87(7):942-53. Epub 2007 May 1. Review.
Diers M, Christmann C, Koeppe C, Ruf M, Flor H Mirrored, imagined and executed movements differentially activate sensorimotor cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain. Pain. 2010 May;149(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.020. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
Flor H, Denke C, Schaefer M, Grüsser S Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain. Lancet. 2001 Jun 2;357(9270):1763-4.
Flor H Maladaptive plasticity, memory for pain and phantom limb pain: review and suggestions for new therapies. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 May;8(5):809-18. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.5.809. Review.
Foell J, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Flor H, Cole J Phantom limb pain after lower limb trauma: origins and treatments. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2011 Dec;10(4):224-35. doi: 10.1177/1534734611428730. Review.
Hovington CL, Brouwer B Guided motor imagery in healthy adults and stroke: does strategy matter? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Nov-Dec;24(9):851-7. doi: 10.1177/1545968310374190. Epub 2010 Sep 12.
Hwang S, Jeon HS, Yi CH, Kwon OY, Cho SH, You SH Locomotor imagery training improves gait performance in people with chronic hemiparetic stroke: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jun;24(6):514-22. doi: 10.1177/0269215509360640. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
MacIver K, Lloyd DM, Kelly S, Roberts N, Nurmikko T Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2181-91. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn124. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
Mercier C, Sirigu A Training with virtual visual feedback to alleviate phantom limb pain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(6):587-94. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328717. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
Moseley GL Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2129-34. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.