Aged — Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention
Citation(s)
Abraham, C (2012) Designing and evaluating interventions to change health-related behaviour patterns. In I. Boultron and P.M.D. Ravaud (Eds.), Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonpharmacological Treatments. (pp. 357-368). London: Chapman and Hall.
Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.
Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2. Epub 2012 May 10.
Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande SW, Ozanne EM, Elwyn G The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 3;16(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3085. Erratum In: J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e32. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e32.
Bartholomew, L K., Parcel, G.S., Kok, G., Gottlieb, N.H., Fernandez, M.E. (2011) Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. London: Willey Press.
Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759.
Bowling A, Rowe G, McKee M Patients' experiences of their healthcare in relation to their expectations and satisfaction: a population survey. J R Soc Med. 2013 Apr;106(4):143-9. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120147.
Bowling A An "inverse satisfaction law"? Why don't older patients criticise health services? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jul;56(7):482. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.7.482-a. No abstract available.
Burt J Following the mixed methods trail: some travel advice. Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):264-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685045. No abstract available.
Butterworth JE, Campbell JL Older patients and their GPs: shared decision making in enhancing trust. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):e709-18. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682297.
Campbell J, Smith P, Nissen S, Bower P, Elliott M, Roland M The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Aug 22;10:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-57.
Coleman T Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. Fam Pract. 2000 Oct;17(5):422-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.5.422.
Croker J E. and Campbell J.L. (2009) 'Satisfaction with access to healthcare: qualitative study of rural patients and practitioners' Primary Healthcare Research & Development, vol. 10, pp. 309-319.
Eldridge, S and Kerry, S. (2012) A Practical Guide to Cluster Randomised Trials in Health Services Research, 1st Edition, New Jersey USA: Wiley.
Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):892-9.
Flocke SA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF Relationships between physician practice style, patient satisfaction, and attributes of primary care. J Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;51(10):835-40.
Johnson BT, Scott-Sheldon LA, Carey MP Meta-synthesis of health behavior change meta-analyses. Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2193-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155200. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):319-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
Loh A, Leonhart R, Wills CE, Simon D, Harter M The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jan;65(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.007.
McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 13;12:157. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-157.
McCabe, R , et al. (2015). Shared Decision Making in Dementia: The ShareD Project, [online], Available: http://medicine.exeter.ac.uk/research/healthserv/shared/ [14 Nov 2015].
McHugh ML Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
Michie, S , Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. (2008) 'From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques', Applied Psychology, vol. 57, no. 4, Oct, pp. 660-680.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191-4.
NHS Information Centre (2009) Trends in consultation rates in general practice 1995 to 2008: analysis of the Q Research® database [online], Available: https://catalogue.ic.nhs.uk/publications/primary-care/general-practice/tren-cons-rate-gene- prac-95-09/tren-cons-rate-gene-prac-95-09-95-08-rep.pdf [03 Nov 2015].
Oeppen J, Vaupel JW Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1029-31. doi: 10.1126/science.1069675. No abstract available.
Ommen O, Thuem S, Pfaff H, Janssen C The relationship between social support, shared decision-making and patient's trust in doctors: a cross-sectional survey of 2,197 inpatients using the Cologne Patient Questionnaire. Int J Public Health. 2011 Jun;56(3):319-27. doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0212-x. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
Pawson, R and Tilley, M. (1997) Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.
Peters RM Matching physician practice style to patient informational issues and decision-making preferences. An approach to patient autonomy and medical paternalism issues in clinical practice. Arch Fam Med. 1994 Sep;3(9):760-3; discussion 764. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.9.760.
Petticrew M Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions. BMJ. 2003 Apr 5;326(7392):756-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.756. No abstract available.
Price EL, Bereknyei S, Kuby A, Levinson W, Braddock CH 3rd New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults' views. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
Richards, D A. and Hallberg, I.R. (2015) Complex Interventions in Health. An overview of research methods. 1st edition, Abingdon UK: Routledge.
Royal College of General Practitioners (2013) The 2022 GP Compendium of Evidence, [online], Available: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/~/media/Files/Policy/A-Z-policy/The-2022-GP-Compendium-of-Evidence.ashx [20 Oct 2015].
Tarrant C, Stokes T, Baker R Factors associated with patients' trust in their general practitioner: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Oct;53(495):798-800.
Tate AR, Nicholson A, Cassell JA Are GPs under-investigating older patients presenting with symptoms of ovarian cancer? Observational study using General Practice Research Database. Br J Cancer. 2010 Mar 16;102(6):947-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605593. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
The Cochrane Collaboration (2011) Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews, [online], Available: http://handbook.cochrane.org/ [03 Nov 2015].
The Equator Network (2015) Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research, [online], Available: http://www.equator-network.org/ [27-10-2015].
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
Wetzels R, Harmsen M, Van Weel C, Grol R, Wensing M Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD004273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004273.pub2.
Wong, G , Westhorp, R., Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T. (2013) Realist synthesis RAMESES training materials, [online], Available: http://www.ramesesproject.org/media/Realist_reviews_training_materials.pdf [24 Oct 2015].
World Health Organization (1994) A declaration on the promotion of patients' rights in Europe, [online], Available: http://www.who.int/genomics/public/eu_declaration1994.pdf [03 Nov 2015].
World Health Organization (2016) Definition of an older or elderly person, [online}, Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/ [13/10/2016]
Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.