Clinical trial NCT03137277 - References

Adenoma Detection Rate — A Study Between Two Instrument Generations to Improve Adenoma Detection in Screening Colonoscopy

Citation(s)

•   Adler A, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Scheel M, Schröder A, Yenerim T, Wiedenmann B, Gauger U, Roll S, Rösch T
  Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;10(2):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.026. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
•   Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T, Mayr M, Aminalai A, Drossel R, Schröder A, Scheel M, Wiedenmann B, Rösch T
  Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):410-6.e1; quiz 715. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.022. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
•   Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, Abou-Rebyeh H, Schachschal G, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Khalifa AC, Setka E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Rösch T
  A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut. 2008 Jan;57(1):59-64. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
•   Adler A, Roll S, Marowski B, Drossel R, Rehs HU, Willich SN, Riese J, Wiedenmann B, Rösch T; Berlin Private-Practice Gastroenterology Working Group
  Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 1, BECOP 1). Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1628-38.
•   Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mroß M, Scheel M, Schröder A, Gerber K, Stange G, Roll S, Gauger U, Wiedenmann B, Altenhofen L, Rosch T
  Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):236-41. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300167. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
•   Bajbouj M, Reichenberger J, Neu B, Prinz C, Schmid RM, Rösch T, Meining A
  A prospective multicenter clinical and endoscopic follow-up study of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;43(12):1303-7.
•   Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL
  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41.
•   Bock, J
  , Toutenburg, H. (1991). Sample size determination in clinical research. In: Rao, C.R., Chakraborty, R. (eds.): Handbook of statistics, Elsevier, 515 - 538.
•   Bretagne JF, Ponchon T
  Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):523-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995786. Epub 2008 May 8.
•   Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rösch T, Meining A, Schmidtsdorff G, Hasford J, Hermanek P, Burlefinger R, Birkner B, Schmitt W; Munich Gastroenterology Group
  The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy. 2005 Nov;37(11):1116-22.
•   Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF
  Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1218-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803597. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 12;361(20):2004.
•   Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E
  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
•   Meining A, Driesnack U, Classen M, Rösch T
  Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care: results of a survey in 2 areas in Germany. Z Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan;40(1):15-20.
•   Meining A, Ott R, Becker I, Hahn S, Mühlen J, Werner M, Höfler H, Classen M, Heldwein W, Rösch T
  The Munich Barrett follow up study: suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus based on either endoscopy or histology only--what is the clinical significance? Gut. 2004 Oct;53(10):1402-7.
•   Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, Church JM
  Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug;51(8):1217-20. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9315-3. Epub 2008 May 24.
•   Pioche M, Denis A, Allescher HD, Andrisani G, Costamagna G, Dekker E, Fockens P, Gerges C, Groth S, Kandler J, Lienhart I, Neuhaus H, Petruzziello L, Schachschal G, Tytgat K, Wallner J, Weingart V, Touzet S, Ponchon T, Rösch T
  Impact of 2 generational im
•   Pohl H, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Schröder A, Mayr M, Koch M, Rothe K, Anders M, Voderholzer W, Hoffmann J, Schulz HJ, Liehr RM, Gottschalk U, Wiedenmann B, Rösch T
  Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting. J Intern Med. 2008 Oct;264(4):370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01977.x. Epub 2008 May 15.
•   von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N
  European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Executive summary. Endoscopy. 2012 Sep;44 Suppl 3:SE1-8. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
•   Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Bond JH, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Panish JF, et al
  Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 11;334(2):82-7.
•   Zimmermann-Fraedrich K, Groth S, Sehner S, Schubert S, Aschenbeck J, Mayr M, Aminalai A, Schröder A, Bruhn JP, Bläker M, Rösch T, Schachschal G
  Effects of two instrument-generation changes on adenoma detection rate during screening colonoscopy: results f

A Randomized Comparative Study Between Two Instrument Generations to Improve Adenoma Detection in Screening Colonoscopy

Details for clinical trial NCT03137277