Bueno NB, de Melo IS, de Oliveira SL, da Rocha Ataide T Very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet v. low-fat diet for long-term weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2013 Oct;110(7):1178-87. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513000548. Epub 2013 May 7. Review.
Cappell MS Acute pancreatitis: etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and therapy. Med Clin North Am. 2008 Jul;92(4):889-923, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.04.013. Review.
Lindkvist B, Appelros S, Regnér S, Manjer J A prospective cohort study on risk of acute pancreatitis related to serum triglycerides, cholesterol and fasting glucose. Pancreatology. 2012 Jul-Aug;12(4):317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 10.
Lu M, Wan Y, Yang B, Huggins CE, Li D Effects of low-fat compared with high-fat diet on cardiometabolic indicators in people with overweight and obesity without overt metabolic disturbance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2018 Jan;119(1):96-108. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517002902. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Review.
Mansoor N, Vinknes KJ, Veierød MB, Retterstøl K Effects of low-carbohydrate diets v. low-fat diets on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2016 Feb 14;115(3):466-79. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004699.
Nordmann AJ, Nordmann A, Briel M, Keller U, Yancy WS Jr, Brehm BJ, Bucher HC Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13;166(3):285-93. Review. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med. 2006 Apr 24;166(8):932.
Oskarsson V, Sadr-Azodi O, Discacciati A, Orsini N, Wolk A Overall diet quality and risk of recurrence and progression of non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Oct;57(7):2537-2545. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1526-8. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Sankaran SJ, Xiao AY, Wu LM, Windsor JA, Forsmark CE, Petrov MS Frequency of progression from acute to chronic pancreatitis and risk factors: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1490-1500.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.066. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Spanier BW, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ Epidemiology, aetiology and outcome of acute and chronic pancreatitis: An update. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(1):45-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.10.007. Review.
Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Erratum in: Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):302.
Thomas T, Mah L, Barreto SG Systematic review of diet in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis: a tale of too much or too little? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):310-5. Review.
Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4 Suppl 2):e1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063.
Zhang X, Cui Y, Fang L, Li F Chronic high-fat diets induce oxide injuries and fibrogenesis of pancreatic cells in rats. Pancreas. 2008 Oct;37(3):e31-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181744b50.
The Effect of Dietary Fat Content on the Recurrence of Pancreatitis (EFFORT): Protocol of a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.