Wound Heal Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of PRP on Wound Healing in High Risk Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy
To evaluate the effect of PRP on wound healing in high risk patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
Hysterectomy is one of the most common lines of surgical treatment of various uterine disorders as it provides definitive relief from the associated burdensome symptoms with an estimated prevalence of 13.1 per 10,000 women. The indications for hysterectomy include uterine leiomyomas (fibroid), dysfunctional uterine bleeding, endometrial adenomyosis, genital prolapse, massive postpartum hemorrhages and uterine cancers. Abdominal hysterectomy is still the most commonly used approach although there have been some preferences for vaginal and laparoscopic approaches. Abdominal hysterectomy is associated with risk of complications. In high-risk women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, wound healing can be particularly challenging due to a variety of factors, including poor tissue quality, compromised immune function, and underlying medical conditions. Wound healing is a complex process that involves a series of events that are critical for the restoration of tissue integrity and function. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for enhancing wound healing in high risk patients. PRP is a concentrated source of platelets and growth factors derived from the patient's own blood. It has been shown to promote tissue regeneration and repair by stimulating cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis. PRP has been used successfully in a variety of clinical settings, including orthopedics, dentistry, and dermatology. PRP which contains concentrated growth factors have been reported to accelerate wound healing by30-40% giving a satisfactory outcome in the treatment of chronic skin and soft tissue lesions by supplying large amounts of growth factors and chemokines. When platelets become activated, they secrete Seven fundamental protein growth factors initiating all wound healing process, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Fibroblast growth factor (FGF), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) & insulin like growth factor 1(ILGF 1), which participate in the acceleration of wound healing process. A randomized controlled trial conducted by Tehranian et al. (2016) evaluated the use of PRP in high risk women after caesarian section. The study found that patients treated with PRP had significantly faster wound healing and a significant reduction in pain compared to those who received standard care. Similarly, another study by Fanning et al. (2007) investigated the use of PRP in women undergoing gynecologic surgery, there were no apparent adverse effects, and pain was significantly reduced. In our study, we will investigate the effect of PRP on wound healing in high risk patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05023135 -
DeepView SnapShot Portable (DV-SSP): Device Training Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03459547 -
Soft Peri-implant Tissue Around Different Abutment Materials
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05608187 -
Evaluating Safety and Biological Effect on Wound Healing of ILP100-Topical in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03649308 -
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Traditional Care After Skin Grafting
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04596124 -
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Fitostimoline Plus Cream and Gauze vs Connettivina Bio Plus Cream and Gauze
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03285542 -
Prospective Randomized Trial of Dermabond Prineo in Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05689775 -
Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection With Robot-assisted Harvest of VRAM Flap
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05474911 -
PILONIDAL SINUS: CONVENTIONAL CARE VERSUS NEGATIVE PRESSURE THERAPY.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04849143 -
The Effectiveness of Stingless Bee Honey (Kelulut Honey) Versus Gel in Diabetic Wound Bed Preparation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03596112 -
The Difference in Wound Size Reduction Comparing Two Frequently Used Wound Dressings in Everyday Care
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05169814 -
Micro/Nanobubbles (MNBs) for Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04545476 -
Enhanced Secondary Intention Healing vs. Standard Secondary Intention Healing in Mohs Surgical Defects on the Head and Distal Lower Extremities
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06020157 -
Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05133570 -
Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatment With Vista Care®, in Arterial Ulcers of the Lower Extremities
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04901325 -
Baricitinib in the Treatment of Adults With Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG)
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03668665 -
Influencing Wound Healing Through the Application of Hyaluronic Acid With Perfluorodecalin and Physalis Angulata Extract After Split Skin Removal From the Thigh - A Study in "Split Wound Design"
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03703479 -
Effect of A-PRF After Removal of Wisdom Teeth
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03204851 -
Microlyte Dressing in the Management of Wounds
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06117436 -
Impact of Cilostazol Versus Cilostazol and Selenium Combination on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05618912 -
Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment
|
N/A |