Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03212222
Other study ID # Pro00083577
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 25, 2017
Est. completion date December 15, 2017

Study information

Verified date September 2018
Source Duke University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how visual acuity assessed with Peek Acuity (a cell phone application to check visual acuity) among preschool and school-aged children 3 to less than18 years of age (1) compares to the standard visual acuity exam in the ophthalmology clinic and (2) performs as a screening test for ocular abnormalities that warrant referral for an eye exam.


Description:

Current recommendations suggest that children begin visual acuity screening as early as possible with most children capable at 3 years old though some may not be able to cooperate until 4 years of age. While visual acuity screening is standard in schools and pediatric clinics, the specificity of the exams has been questioned. A number of community screening exams rely on outdated and flawed methods that may not accurately access the vision of all children. Because many children who fail these vision screenings are referred to ophthalmology clinics without a true visual acuity deficit, a more accurate but accessible, cost effective, and feasible vision screening exam is necessary. One solution is a smart phone application designed to assess visual acuity, called Peek Acuity. The application is available for android operating system and can be downloaded as a free beta from the Google Play Store. A short tutorial walks users through the application. The application displays a single letter "E" in 4 positions, 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees (rolling "E") that does not require English comprehension. Patients are instructed to point in the direction of the arms of the "E." The examiner records the responses by swiping the screen in the direction the patient points. The application uses responses to calculate visual acuity and typical exams can be completed within 2 minutes.

In one study, Peek Acuity visual assessments have been shown to be comparable to that determined by the ophthalmology clinic in patients aged 55 years and older. This study also found that the Peek Acuity is efficient, with an average exam time of 77 seconds compared to 82 seconds using the standard Snellen eye chart.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 111
Est. completion date December 15, 2017
Est. primary completion date December 15, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 3 Years to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Capable and willing to provide consent

- 3 to less than 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

- Unable or unwilling to give consent

- Over 18 years of age

- Less than 3 years of age

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Peek Acuity
Cell phone application for visual acuity screening
Standard Visual Screening
Visual screening exam conducted in Duke University Eye Center

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Duke UMC Durham North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Duke University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (9)

Alexander P, Rahi JS, Hingorani M. Provision and cost of children's and young people's eye services in the UK: findings from a single primary care trust. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):645-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.149203. Epub 2008 Dec 19. — View Citation

Anstice N, Spink J, Abdul-Rahman A. Review of preschool vision screening referrals in South Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jul;95(4):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00713.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17. — View Citation

Barry JC, König HH. Test characteristics of orthoptic screening examination in 3 year old kindergarten children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;87(7):909-16. Erratum in: Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;87(9):1196. — View Citation

Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, Weiss HA, Jordan S, Kuper H, Burton MJ. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):930-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468. Erratum in: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;133(9):1096. — View Citation

Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine Section on Ophthalmology; American Association of Certified Orthoptists; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Eye examination in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians: organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children. Ophthalmology. 2003 Apr;110(4):860-5. — View Citation

Joish VN, Malone DC, Miller JM. A cost-benefit analysis of vision screening methods for preschoolers and school-age children. J AAPOS. 2003 Aug;7(4):283-90. — View Citation

Miller JM, Dobson V, Harvey EM, Sherrill DL. Cost-efficient vision screening for astigmatism in native american preschool children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):3756-63. — View Citation

Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, Lagrèze W, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;247(11):1441-54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1150-2. Epub 2009 Aug 11. Review. — View Citation

Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul-Aug;41(1):3-30. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Sensitivity of screening with standard exam vs. Peek Acuity for referral to further medical management Children screened positive for visual deficit by standard exam will be deemed true positives; any true positives not identified by the Peek Acuity application will be deemed false negatives. Sensitivity is calculated by true positive population divided by the sum of true positives and false negatives Visit 1 (up to 30 minutes)
Primary Specificity of screening with standard exam vs. Peek Acuity for referral to further medical management Children screened negative for visual deficit by standard exam will be deemed true negatives; any true negatives not identified by the Peek Acuity application will be deemed false positives. Specificity is calculated by true negative population divided by the sum of true negatives and false positives Visit 1 (up to 30 minutes)
Primary Accuracy of screening with standard exam vs. Peek Acuity for referral to further medical management Visual acuity score determined by Peek Acuity will be compared to the score from standard exam to determine accuracy where the score from standard exam is the accepted value Visit 1(up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Efficiency of screening with standard exam and Peek Acuity Compare average exam time between standard exam and Peek Acuity Visit 1(up to 30 minutes)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06000865 - Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise - GRADE N/A
Recruiting NCT05619432 - Re:Garde Program - Training and Maintaining Visual Perception in Older Adults N/A
Completed NCT03670303 - Trial of an Educational Intervention to Promote Spectacle Use Among Secondary School Children in Islamabad, Pakistan N/A
Completed NCT02896738 - MRI Screening for Auditory Pathway Malformations in Visually Impaired Children
Completed NCT01822717 - Nonvisual Foot Inspection for People With Visual Imapirment N/A
Completed NCT03865134 - Evaluation of Visual - Motor Development in Children With Retinopathy of Prematurity
Active, not recruiting NCT04198350 - Pancreatic Islet Transplantation to the Anterior Chamber of the Eye N/A
Recruiting NCT05220449 - Re-Orchestration of Interregional Oscillatory Activity to Promote Visual Recovery N/A
Completed NCT04190147 - Eye and Growth in Adolescents Born Moderate-to-late Preterm
Completed NCT05135195 - A Virtual Reality Platform Simulating Visual Impairment for Testing of Electronic Travel Aids and Performing Orientation and Mobility Training N/A
Recruiting NCT05199363 - Pediatric Patient Experience on a Diagnostic Path N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03767803 - Collection of Whole Blood Samples for the Evaluation of Preeclampsia (Pre-E) Biomarkers From Pregnant Women
Recruiting NCT03571217 - Shanghai Beixinjing Diabetic Eyes Study
Not yet recruiting NCT03726606 - A Comparison of the Visual Performance of Trifocal Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses N/A
Completed NCT02259088 - A 12-month, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab vs Laser in Chinese Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT06197607 - Effect of Hand Exercises on Hand Grip Strength and Manual Ability in Children With Visual Impairment N/A
Withdrawn NCT04579653 - Pupillometry and Locus Coeruleus Activation (PuLCA) N/A
Recruiting NCT05844982 - Intravitreal Faricimab Injections or Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.19 mg) Intravitreal Implants vs Observation for Prevention of VA Loss Due to Radiation Retinopathy Phase 3
Recruiting NCT02258113 - Measuring of Neuro-visual Functionality With Ocusweep N/A
Completed NCT02607384 - The Baltimore Reading and Eye Disease Study N/A