Ventricular Tachycardia Clinical Trial
— CARDIOKITOfficial title:
Prospective Cardiac Ultrasound Imaging Study With Demonstrator
Verified date | May 2023 |
Source | Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The Prospective Cardiac Ultrasound Imaging Study is a single center, single arm, feasibility study. The study aims at collecting cardiac ultrasound data from patients diagnosed with ventricular tachycardia, during rest and short breath hold sequences. This study is part of the engineering studies linked to the CardioKit-Minimum Viable Product project. The CardioKit prototype used in the study can monitor cyclical heart-beat motion, cyclical respiratory motion and non-cyclical heart position changes while the patient is lying in supine position.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 24 |
Est. completion date | February 3, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | July 5, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 100 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient with history of ventricular tachycardia 2. Over 18 years old 3. Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient in arrhythmic storm |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo | Pavia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia |
Italy,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Image quality in terms of allowing a correct identification of the phase of the cardiac cycle by the prototype software. | The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of patients able to obtain a positive result in a multi parametric score of image quality, consisting of:
Score = 1: average phase error per patient, defined as the difference between the phase of the cardiac cycle identified by the algorithm and the one evaluated by the ECG reference <0.1. Score = 0: average phase error per patient =0.1. For each patient, scoring was done for each imaging view (i.e., parasternal and apical). If the score was 2 (at least 1 point in A or B and 1 point in C or D) or greater for at least one of the imaging views, the outcome was considered as positive. The final result is the proportion of patients (in %) with a positive outcome, defined as the number of patients with a positive evaluation divided by the total number of patients x 100. |
Baseline | |
Primary | Image quality in terms of allowing a correct measurement of the heart displacement (mainly due to respiratory motion) by the prototype software. | The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of patients able to obtain a positive result in a multi parametric score of image quality, consisting of:
Score = 1: maximum excursion calculated by the algorithm <30 mm with a total 3D error in the calculation of the displacement <3 mm. Score = 0: either maximum excursion calculated by the algorithm =30 mm or total 3D error in the calculation of the displacement =3 mm (or both). For each patient, scoring was done for each imaging view (i.e., parasternal and apical). If the score was 2 (at least 1 point in A or B and 1 point in C or D) or greater for at least one of the imaging views, the outcome was considered as positive. The final result is the proportion of patients (in %) with a positive outcome, defined as the number of patients with a positive evaluation divided by the total number of patients x 100. |
Baseline | |
Primary | Image quality in terms of the ability to distinguish typical cardiac structures, as assessed visually by the clinical operator. | The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of patients able to obtain a positive result in a multi parametric score of image quality, consisting of:
Score = 1: ability to identify visually by an experienced operator in the acquired image at least one of the following structures: left ventricular free wall, interventricular septum, mitral valve, or aortic valve. Score = 0: inability to identify at least one of these structures. For each patient, scoring was done for each imaging view (i.e., parasternal and apical). If the score was 2 (at least 1 point in A or B and 1 point in C or D) or greater for at least one of the imaging views, the outcome was considered as positive. The final result is the proportion of patients (in %) with a positive outcome, defined as the number of patients with a positive evaluation divided by the total number of patients x 100. |
Baseline | |
Primary | Image quality in terms of the stability of the image throughout the respiration cycle, as assessed visually by the clinical operator. | The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of patients able to obtain a positive result in a multi parametric score of image quality, consisting of:
Score = 1: persistence of cardiac structures within the echocardiographic image during respiratory motion. Score = 0: disappearance of cardiac structures from the echocardiographic image during respiratory motion. For each patient, scoring was done for each imaging view (i.e., parasternal and apical). If the score was 2 (at least 1 point in A or B and 1 point in C or D) or greater for at least one of the imaging views, the outcome was considered as positive. The final result is the proportion of patients (in %) with a positive outcome, defined as the number of patients with a positive evaluation divided by the total number of patients x 100. |
Baseline |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03453645 -
Modification of Rhythmic Risk Assessment by Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
|
||
Completed |
NCT05970120 -
A Study of Intracardiac Ultrasound With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05791032 -
Sub Chronic Evaluation for ATP With an Extravascular Placed ICD Lead (STEP ICD) Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04011631 -
Evaluation of the iD-SystemTM, One-Handed Disposable Internal Defibrillation System.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03536052 -
Ablation at Virtual-hEart pRedicted Targets for VT
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06063811 -
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in LVAD Patients
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02962076 -
Study of Cardiac PET/CT Imaging to Guide Ablation Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02784912 -
Biomarkers in Risk Stratification of Sustainted Ventricular Tachycardia or Electrical Storm After Ablation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01791543 -
Intramural Needle Ablation for Ablation of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02891863 -
Low Energy Therapy to Convert Ventricular Tachycardias
|
Phase 0 | |
Terminated |
NCT01546207 -
Stepwise Approach To sUbstrate Modification for Ventricular Tachycardia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01294267 -
Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 During Scar-related Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00383799 -
Iv Amiodarone Versus Iv Procainamide to Treat Haemodynamically Well Tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04884100 -
enHEART - Exploring Full Content of Optical Signals to Enhance Cardiac Arrhythmia Screening
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04642963 -
Stereotactic Management of Arrhythmia - Radiosurgery in Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05377216 -
Characterization of Cardiac Electrophysiological Effects of Autonomic Neuromodulation
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04990089 -
VIVO European Observational Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT04065893 -
Impact of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias on Suboptimal Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03631303 -
Post-Extrasystolic Potentiation as a Predictor of Ventricular Arrhythmias
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03611465 -
Creation of a Pace-mapping Atlas on Healthy and Pathological Hearts
|
N/A |