View clinical trials related to Ventilator Associated Pneumonia.
Filter by:The use of corticosteroids in patients with severe community pneumonia, bacterial infection which kills lots of patients around the world, reduces the mortality of this infection. However, there are no studies with this type of drug regarding hospital-acquired pneumonia. This will be the first multicenter randomized trial to test hydrocortisone plus standard therapy in critical care patients with nosocomial pneumonia. This intervention is inexpensive and may improve the outcome of those patients, besides having an acceptable side effects profile.
Oral care is a fundamental aspect of nursing that impact the health and comfort of patients over both the short and long term. Caring for very sick patients in a busy stressful environment may result in oral care having a lower priority for nurses than other aspects of care (Sarangi, Simon, & Sarangi, 2021). Negligence of these interventions can cause long-term oral problems and nosocomial diseases most notably VAP (Abd Alraheem, 2020). A study conducted by Ayşe et al. (2019) reported that the application of regular oral care for the MV patients as a part of care protocols decreased bacterial colonization and had a protective and improving effect on oral health. A recent study conducted by Rizk, Saad-eldeen and Helmy (2020) concluded that VAP is a serious ICU acquired infection with significant impact and required effective preventive action. A systematic review conducted by Kharel, Bist and Mishra (2021) concluded that VAP is a critical issue in ICU with a high-cost burden and various interventional educational programs like staff training and hygiene awareness can reduce the future risk of VAP. A recent study conducted by Abd Alraheem (2020) illustrated that 53.3% of the MV patients had average oral alteration. Asystematic review conducted by Kharel et al. (2021) to assess VAP among ICU patients in WHO South east Asian region illustrated that the VAP incidence rate ranged from 0.2% to 11.6% differing greatly between countries. The highest VAP prevalence rate was reported from the medical ICU, India, where as the lowest was from the palliative care ICU, South Korea. In Egypt, analysis of VAP was done in some Egyptian University Hospitals by Fathy, Abdelhafeez, EL-Gilany and Abd Elhafez, (2013) who reported that the incidence of VAP ranged from 16% to 75%, the lowest ratio was in Alexandria University 16% and the highest one in Ain Shams University 75%. The incidence in Mansoura University Hospitals (MUH) was 22.6%. Another recent study conducted by Elkolaly, Bahr, El-Shafey, Basuoni, and Elber (2019) reported that the incidence of VAP in Tanta University Hospitals is still high (38.4%). Many studies investigated the effect of oral care with chlorhexidine on the incidence of VAP and oral health in MV patients (Abd Alraheem, 2020; Collins et al., 2020; Heck, 2012; Moustafa, Tantawey, El-Soussi and Ramadan, 2016; Plantinga et al., 2016). However, the recent reappraisal of the evidence suggests that chlorhexidine does not reduce VAP, causes excess mortality in non-cardiac surgery patients (Dale et al., 2019) and unexpected high incidence of oral mucosal lesions (Plantinga et al., 2016). Moreover, from my empirical experience, chlorhexidine is not available in all Egyptian hospitals because of its economic burden. A study conducted by Moustafa et al. (2016) recommended regular updates about evidence-based guidelines for oral care and its effect on VAP prevention and oral health. The debate of the literature about oral care inspired us to investigate this area.
Clinical trial looking at safety and efficacy of suvratoxumab in prevention of pneumonia caused by Staphylococcus aureus in high-risk patients
COVID-19 has multiple facets including cytokine storm, thromboembolism and gelatinous secretions. It is known that oxygen exchange is the main problem in patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia is one of the most serious, in which patients succumb to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In other severe respiratory disease such as ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), formation of biofilm in the endotracheal tube causes infection to spread to the lungs, resulting in respiratory decline and high mortality. The development of gelatinous sputum plugs correlates with negative outcome. Both groups of patients still have limited therapy options. BromAc is a potent mucolytic, biofilm degrader, cleaves the glycoproteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (antiviral), and down regulates cytokines and chemokine in COVID-19 sputum. The investigators seek to examine the safety and attempt to gain preliminary efficacy of nebulised BromAc in moderate to severe COVID-19 and other mucus producing, severe, respiratory diseases.
Background: Standard practice of flushing saline over the patient's secretions following suctioning is similar to pouring water over grease, leading to motivating bacterial colonization and proliferation inside the suctioning circuit (i.e., catheter, tube, and collecting jar), which can then migrate to patient's lung during suctioning procedure causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Therefore, flushing this circuit using an appropriate disinfectant to prevent bacterial colonization inside it and thus decreasing pneumonia occurrence has been our crucial investigation idea. Aim: To investigate the effect of suction system flushing with chlorhexidine (CHX) on the occurrence of VAP among mechanically ventilated patients (MVPs). Design: This study adopted a quasi-experimental research design, and a convenience sampling technique was used to recruit 136 patients to conduct this study. Setting: This study was conducted at surgical intensive care units of Mansoura University Emergency Hospital, Egypt. Results: The intervention group patients had a lower incidence of VAP (by 48.12%) compared with the control group. Moreover, the proposed technique was more effective in decreasing the incidence of late-VAP more than early-VAP. Furthermore, CHX reduced the cost of suction system flushing by 75%. Conclusion: Suction system flushing with CHX can significantly reduce the occurrence of VAP among MVPs and reduce the flushing cost. Therefore, this study recommends incorporating CHX into the daily care of MVPs.
This retro-prospective monocentric observational study compare the impact of the implementation of a restrictive (delayed) versus aggressive (immediate) antibiotic strategy for Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia suspicion without severity symptoms.
Premature very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are susceptible to complications related to infrequent and non-standardized oral care. Although the benefits of frequent standardized oral care are known to reduce oral dybiosis (increased level of potentially pathogenic bacteria) and its associated complications in critically ill adults leading to established evidence-based guidelines, no such information exists for VLBW infants. The proposed study will prospectively follow 40 VLBW infants for 4 weeks following birth. Infants will be randomized into 1 of 2 groups. Standardized oral care will be performed every 3-4 hours (Group 1) and every 12 hours (Group 2). Aim 1 will evaluate the feasibility of frequent standardized oral care, Aim 2 will compare the oral microbiome between groups, and Aim 3 will compare respiratory outcomes including the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and need for respiratory support between infants receiving standardized oral care every 3-4 hours and every 12 hours. Issues related to recruitment, retention, randomization, acceptance by nursing staff, and treatment fidelity will be examined. Saliva samples will be obtained weekly and analyzed using 16S sequencing, respiratory cultures will be obtained weekly on ventilated infants, and respiratory outcomes will be collected from the medical records.
Increasing emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria worldwide is now considered one of the most urgent threats to global health. The association between increase of antibiotics consumption and resistance emergence has been well documented for all patients admitted to the Intensive care unit (ICU) who received antibiotic treatment and for patients treated for ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Reduction of use of antibiotics is a major point in the war against antimicrobial resistance. VAP is the first cause of healthcare-associated infections in ICU and more than half of antibiotics prescriptions in ICU are due to VAP. Once the diagnosis of pneumonia under MV has been made, initiation of antibiotic treatment must be prompt but there is no clear consensus on its duration. In the case of a good clinical response to treatment, it has been shown in some situations that short course antibiotics can be effective without side effects and antimicrobial stewardship initiatives can be applied successfully and effectively to the management of Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP). The hypothesis is that an antimicrobial stewardship is possible in the treatment of VAP with no increase in the rate of all-cause mortality, treatment failure or occurrence of new episode of pneumonia. The objective is to investigate whether an antimicrobial stewardship for VAP based on daily assessment of clinical cure and antimicrobial discontinuation, if it is obtained, would be non-inferior in terms of all-cause mortality, treatment failure or occurrence of new episode of pneumonia. This study will be a prospective, national multicenter (31 centers), phase III, comparative randomized (1:1), single-blinded clinical trial comparing two management strategies of treatment of pneumonia on the basis of two parallel arms: Experimental group: Antimicrobial stewardship based on daily clinical assessment of clinical cure. Control group: standard management: duration of appropriate antibiotic therapy for confirmed VAP according to guidelines.
In December 2019, a new pandemic emerged, the COVID-19 disease caused by a SARS-Cov-2 virus. One of the most common symptoms of COVID-19 is mainly respiratory failure and patients requires assistance by mechanical ventilation. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a risk of this assistance. Since the beginning of the pandemic, Standard of care have evolved with new data. The prevalence of these VAPs seems significantly higher in the population of patients with ARDS COVID-19 (40-50%) and their ecology seems to have evolved over time, particularly in terms of bacterial resistance. Investigators want to describe and compare this evolution of bacterial and fungal ecology as well as identify potential risk factors that may be associated with these changes in ecology during different waves.
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAPs) are a very common side effect in intensive care units. They are the leading causes of nosocomial infections and excess mortality in intensive care units: associated with a controversial death rate of around 13%. VAPs complicate about 40-50% of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the mortality would be twice higher. Thus, in this context of the COVID-19 pandemic, this represents a considerable rate of patients. Unfortunately, the risk factors for VAPs are poorly understood and the bacterial ecology varies around the world. Also, facing a high prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria in this population, the choice of probabilistic antibiotic therapy is complex and represents a considerable impact for care. New microbiological rapid diagnostic techniques have appeared in recent years, among them the FilmArray® seems to present interesting diagnostic performances with the ability to detects resistance to antibiotics. This technique has been studied in acute community pneumonia but has not been validated in VAP and even less during the COVID-19 period. Investigators decide to conduct this study to investigate if the early identification of the pathogens and their mechanism of resistance using FilmArray® would improve the relevance of the antibiotic treatment. The aim of this project is to evaluate the contribution of a rapid diagnostic technique to the management of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia during COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome before an interventional study.