Vaginal Vault Prolapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Clinical Prospective Study With Robot-Assisted Technique(da Vinci®-System)
The aim of the study is to evaluate safety and outcome of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacropexy regarding perioperative data, objective anatomical results and postoperative quality of life.
Vaginal vault prolapse is a common finding in Gynecology. Many different approaches for
vaginal vault prolapse repair are available. During the last few years robot-assisted
surgery has been introduced in many surgical specialties and experiences in gynecologic
surgery are very limited.
Several aspects like the wider range of motion of robot-instruments leading to more
precision in surgery, the 3 dimensional optical system and the ergonomically designed
console may offer some advantages. For better judgment these possible benefits as well as
safety and outcome need to be evaluated and compared with conventional laparoscopic
sacropexy techniques.
This prospective clinical study evaluates robot-assisted laparoscopic sacropexy (da
Vinci®-System) focusing on peri-operative data, objective anatomical results and
postoperative quality of life and compares the results with conventional laparoscopic
sacropexy. Pre- peri- and post-operative data are collected using the prolapse
quantification system (POP-Q) and the German Pelvic Floor questionnaire. The objective of
the study will be to investigate if the robot assisted procedure shows significant
advantages for the patient considering duration of surgery, complications, hospitalization,
quality of life and costs.
;
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03681223 -
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02290288 -
Prospective Study for Vaginal Vault Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Comparison of Two Surgical Methods
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03714607 -
Laser Therapy in Managing Vaginal Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04172896 -
Intraperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspensions for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01840176 -
Prophylactic Modified McCall Culdoplasty During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01097200 -
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00223106 -
Treatment for Stress and Mixed Urinary Incontinence and Vaginal Vault Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05628831 -
Traditional Vaginal Surgery VS Autologous Tissue in Pelvic Floor Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02680145 -
Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01394237 -
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Long Term Follow-up
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00928239 -
Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Comparison of Mesh Attachment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05688059 -
Absorbable Suture vs Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01244165 -
Study of Cytrix Use in Pelvic Floor Prolapse Treatment
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02431897 -
Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina Using Estrogen
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04038099 -
Lessons on Urethral Lidocaine in Urodynamics
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05960292 -
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
|
N/A |