Uterovaginal Prolapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Controlled Study of Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
- objective: aimed to compare laparoscopic/robot-assisted hysteropexy with vaginal
hysterectomy for uterine prolapse
- prospective randomized clinical trial
- patient
1. 60yrs or more women and
2. POP-Q stage II with symptom or POP-Q III, IV regardless of symptom
- number of patient: 146
- randomize: laparoscopic/robot-assisted hysteropexy vs. hysterectomy
- follow up: postoperative 1 year
- primary endpoint: recurrence rate
1. recurrence of uterovaginal prolapse POP-Q stage II-IV
2. recurrence of associated symptom
- secondary endpoint
1. postoperative 1 year QOL, degree of satisfaction evaluation
2. operative time, estimated blood loss
3. hospitalization period, postoperative pain, return to normal activity
n/a
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT01347021 -
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05688059 -
Absorbable Suture vs Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05477043 -
Ureteral Patency After Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01802281 -
Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial
|
N/A |