Uterovaginal Prolapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
Sacrospinous Colpopexy Versus High Uterosacral Colpopexy in the Treatment of Genital Prolapse Grade III/IV in Women With Uterus
The purpose of this study is to compare the vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and high uterosacral colpopexy in the treatment of genital prolapse grade III/IV in women with uterus.
Hysterectomy is often the traditional approach for women with uterovaginal prolapse. However, hysterectomy alone does not address the underlying problem of deficient apical support. Surgical options for patients with apical prolapse include transvaginal suspension procedures using pelvic structures for fixation, such as the sacrospinous ligament or uterosacral ligaments.The objective of this study is to compare the sacrospinous fixation with high uterosacral in the treatment of uterine prolapse POP-Q stage 3 or 4 in terms of recurrence of prolapse,quality of life,complications,post-operative recovery, hospital stay. ;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02877407 -
Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05688059 -
Absorbable Suture vs Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05477043 -
Ureteral Patency After Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01802281 -
Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial
|
N/A |