Uterine Scar Defect Clinical Trial
— SUTUREOfficial title:
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Techniques of Uterine Closure on the Myometrium Thickness Evaluated With Ultrasound Six Months After a Primary Cesarean
This study compares three techniques of uterine closure on myometrium thickness evaluated by ultrasound six months after the primary cesarean. The three techniques include: 1) locked single layer closure; 2) double layer closure with a first continuous locked suture and a second imbricating continuous suture; 3) double layer closure with a first continuous unlocked suture of the deep portion of the myometrium avoiding the inclusion of the decidua and a second unlocked continuous suture that approximate the upper portion of the myometrium. The primary outcome is the mean myometrium thickness at the site of the uterine scar evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound at six months after cesarean.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 81 |
Est. completion date | March 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Planned cesarean - Primary cesarean - = 38 gestational weeks Exclusion Criteria: - Previous cesarean - Women < 18 years old - Multiple gestation - Mullerian anomalies - Active labor - Diabetes - BMI >35 kg/m2 - Placenta praevia - Chronic systemic disease |
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Prevention
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | CHU de Québec | Québec | Quebec |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, CHU de Québec | Laval University, Université de Montréal |
Canada,
Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, Moore L, Jastrow N, Demers S, Bujold E. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect. Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):465-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829. Epub 2012 Mar 7. Review. — View Citation
Roberge S, Chaillet N, Boutin A, Moore L, Jastrow N, Brassard N, Gauthier RJ, Hudic I, Shipp TD, Weimar CH, Fatusic Z, Demers S, Bujold E. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Oct;115(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013. Epub 2011 Jul 26. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Mean myometrium thickness | Using transvaginal ultrasound the residual myometrium thickness at the site of the uterine scar will be measure. | 6 months after intervention | No |
Secondary | Estimated blood loss | Same day of intervention: day 1 | No | |
Secondary | Operative time | Same day of intervention: day 1 | No | |
Secondary | Mean number of haemostatic sutures | Same day of intervention: day 1 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04871022 -
Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
|
N/A |