Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04980196 |
Other study ID # |
0304824 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 20, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
May 1, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
July 2021 |
Source |
Alexandria University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
urodynamic investigation when added in the diagnostic work-up of women with lower urinary
tract dysfunction with POP is debatable.
This study was planned to determine the usefulness of preoperative urodynamic study in
improving urological outcome following surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse and
urinary tract dysfunction.
Description:
60 patients, fulfilled the selection criteria were counseled and informed about the trial
protocol and a written consent according to declaration of Helsinki was signed. Participants
were randomly assigned following simple randomization procedures (computerized random
numbers) to group (1) or group (2). Each group consisted of 30 patients. All participants had
been thoroughly evaluated by history and examination. A standardized questionnaire was
obtained to evaluate the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence
and obstructive symptoms. Clinical staging of pelvic organ prolapse by POP Q Staging.
Ultrasound examination had been also carried out to rule out any pelvic pathology. Patients
had completed a 3-day bladder diary (frequency volume chart) to assist in arriving at an
urodynamic diagnosis. Urinalysis was performed. Only patients allocated for group 1 were
subjected to urodynamic studies before surgical intervention and then corrective procedures
for POP had been done .The Urodynamic studies carried out were : uroflowmetry and cystometry.
The Uroflowmetry was performed by the gravimeter method, where maximum flow rate, average
flow rate, voided volume and residual urine was measured. Maximum flow rate ≤15 ml/sec,
and/or residual urine of more than 50 ml or 10% of voided volume in a bladder filled with a
minimum of 150 ml was taken as cut off to detect abnormal voiding. Cystometric parameters
which indicated normal bladder function were first desire to void between 150 and 200 ml,
capacity (taken as strong desire to void) of greater than 400 ml, detrusor pressure rise on
filling of less than 15 mm H2O per 500 ml infused, absence of detrusor contractions, no
leakage on coughing, no significant pain on filling and finally a detrusor pressure rises on
voiding (maximum voiding pressure) of less than 50 cm H2O, with a peak flow rate of more than
15 ml/s for a voided volume over 150 ml. Urodynamic stress incontinence was diagnosed when
urethral leakage was seen with increased abdominal pressure, in the absence of detrusor
contractions. Detrusor over activity was diagnosed when the patient has involuntary detrusor
contractions during filling with or without leakage which may be spontaneous or provoked. All
participants were followed-up with same questionnaire and clinical examination after 12 weeks
post operatively.