Clinical Trials Logo

Urinary Stress Incontinence clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Urinary Stress Incontinence.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05464316 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Incontinence

Prospective Pilot ATOMS vs AUS

Start date: January 13, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence (PPI) is a common complication affecting 1% to 40% of patients after surgery. When conservative treatments fail, the installation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been the treatment of choice for PPI since its introduction more than 50 years ago. Although small studies suggest inferior success rate of male slings compare to the AUS in moderate to severe male incontinence; recent studies, one prospective and one Canadian multicenter cohort study, have demonstrated adjustable transobturator male sling (ATOMS) as a safe and efficient alternative to treat PPI. Interestingly, the ATOMS does not required any operation manipulation from the user in order to void and it causes potentially less urethral erosion and less urethral atrophy than the AUS; although those findings were never compared head to head with the AUS. Therefore, we believe that a thorough prospective non-inferiority study comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of the ATOMS device versus the AUS in treating moderate to severe PPI could prove itself useful in guiding urologists and patients to choose their best treatment of male incontinence. The null hypothesis posed for the present study is that ATOMS is non inferior to AUS for the treatment of moderate to severe PPI using the non-inferiority margin of 15% to be of acceptable lower effectiveness. With regards to study methods, this will be a pilot prospective, randomized controlled trial, non-blinded with a non-inferiority design. This pilot study will take place at the CIUSSS de l'Estrie, in Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, with two surgeons. All male patients with moderate to severe incontinence after their prostate surgery, who are suitable for incontinence surgery will be screened for study eligibility respecting the exclusion and inclusion criteria. After written informed consent, enrolled patients will be randomized assigned (1:1) to one of the two interventions' arms (AUS or ATOMS). Sixty patients are estimated to be randomized in the two arms the day of their surgery with a computer-based algorithm sequence. By completing this pilot prospective study, we hope to provide concrete and scientifically significant evidence on the effectiveness of ATOMS in the treatment of moderate to severe PPI comparing with the AUS. Although both treatments are commonly used today, there has been little evidence comparing both devices side by side with more severe PPI. We therefore hope to make a global impact with said project.

NCT ID: NCT04817839 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Stress Incontinence

Optimal Duration of Post-Operative Activity Restriction After Midurethral Sling Procedures

Start date: July 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction between 3 and 6-week postoperative restrictions after a midurethral sling procedure.

NCT ID: NCT04101279 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Stress Incontinence

Midurethral Synthetic Tape With Tension Control Mechanism Versus Midurethral Free Tape

Start date: April 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, comparative randomized controled trial. The general purposes of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of midurethral synthetic tape with tension control mechanism and conventional midurethral tension free tape as surgical treatment for female urinary stress incontinence.

NCT ID: NCT03301142 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Stress Incontinence

Study Comparing the Use of Laser and of Kinesiotherapy for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Start date: August 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is compare the effect of laser and of kinesiotherapy in the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence

NCT ID: NCT02935803 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Stress Incontinence

A Study on the Anti-incontinent Effectiveness of the mTVM Method in POPQ Stage II-III Patients

TVMvsmTVM
Start date: July 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

An increasing number of specific procedures have been described for the surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and concomitant stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The investigators introduced an alternative operative method for POP-Q II-III repair and anti-incontinence with the trans vaginal mesh (TVM) anterior edge fixed to the periurethral tissues at the level of mid-urethra. The efficacy and short- and long-term complication profile, of this new surgical technique as compared with those of non-modified TVM.

NCT ID: NCT02617797 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Stress Incontinence

Radiofrequency in the Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Start date: September 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Urinary stress incontinence ( SUI ) is defined as an involuntary loss of urinary Complaint no effort According to the Consensus of the International Continence Society (Society Continence International - ICS) . SUI Prevalence of adult female Population and 25 % to 30 %.However, despite the high prevalence, many women who have symptoms of SUI or not seek treatment remain without resolution of symptoms.Then there is the possibility of using non-invasive radiofrequency and non-ablation in external urethral meatus in order to stimulate collagen production, as one of the pathophysiological mechanisms of stress urinary incontinence is the collagen deficit in the urethral wall. It is a randomized clinical trial and the group experimental will utilize radiofrequency and kinesiotheraphy ( clinical and in home) and the group control utilize turn off- radiofrequency and kinesiotherapy (clinical and in home). The protocol f the kinesiotherapy is the same both the group, and the protocol radiofrequency the group experimental will 5 sessions (one per week) with temperature 38ºC during 2 minutes. The group control will 5 sessions (one per week) but the radiofrequency will off but glycerin is heated, for masking for the patient, during 2 min. The result of the treatment is assessed by pad test 1 hour and have others outcomes ( quality of life- Sf-26 ans King Health- and sexual function- FSFI questionaire)

NCT ID: NCT00136071 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Stress Incontinence

Transvaginal Tension Free Vaginal Tape-Obturator (TVT-O) Versus Transobturator Tape-Mentor (TOT) in the Management of Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence

Start date: May 2005
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Urinary incontinence (involuntary leakage of urine) is an extremely common, distressing and socially disabling condition. It is known to affect up to 14 % of the adult female population in the United Kingdom. Sufferers tend to become social recluses, not wanting to socialise for fear of embarrassment and ridicule. It typically takes up to 5 years from the onset of symptoms for a patient to admit their problem, seek help and reach a specialist. Unfortunately, it is commonest in the elderly when the incidence is as high as 50% in some studies. Furthermore, this group of patients are the least likely to seek help, the least likely to receive help and up until recently the least likely to be cured of their problems. Things are improving however, as everyone is more prepared to talk about this awful condition rather than accept it as a part of growing old. Furthermore, better treatments are becoming available which can help the old as well as the young. Two years ago a new operation for urinary leakage was launched in the United Kingdom (UK). This is a smaller operation than those previously available and more suitable for the frail and elderly. We, the researchers at South Glasgow University Hospital, have been using this operation for 18 months with good success. Several versions however are now on the market, some much more expensive than the original, and perhaps not as good. We need to know which one is best and hence we intend to do a study to find out. We aim to select patients with leakage to have one or the other operation and to follow the patients over several years to find out which operation is best, safest, lasts longest and is most acceptable to patients. Only then will we know which of the versions of this procedure we should be offering our patients.