Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05182632
Other study ID # CER VN 20-21-33
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 6, 2021
Est. completion date March 6, 2025

Study information

Verified date November 2022
Source Université de Montréal
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The recommended treatment for urinary incontinence (UI) in women is individualized pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), a costly and resource-intensive approach; one Canada is currently unable to meet. A recent non-inferiority randomized controlled trial just confirmed that group-based PFMT is equally effective but less resource-intensive (more cost-effective) than individual PFMT to treat UI in older women (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02039830). In times of COVID-19 however, with the Quebec, Canada's public health authorities preventing gatherings to stop the virus' spread, the potential of in-person group approaches is temporarily limited. It is thus important to develop innovative ways to deliver this first-line treatment remotely, particularly for those confined at home for whom UI can have a detrimental impact on physical health and quality of life. Ensuring an online option for group-based PFMT would also allow to increase the accessibility of UI treatment for women living in rural or remote areas in Canada, where pelvic floor rehabilitation services are not available or scarce. To this end, this study will assess the feasibility, acceptability and effects of a tele-rehabilitation PFMT group program for UI in older women.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 32
Est. completion date March 6, 2025
Est. primary completion date April 6, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 65 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. 65 or older, as older women will show a particular genitourinary profile compared with younger women, notably due to menopause. This age cut-off was used in other studies in UI; 2. Ambulatory (able to walk, move about safely and autonomously without any mobility device); 3. Describe a pattern of stress/mixed UI, confirmed using the Questionnaire for Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID); 4. Have at least three urinary leakage per week, persisting for 3 months or more; 5. Understand French or English instructions; 6. Report no important cognitive deficit (determined with a Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) score of 24/30 or more); 7. Have an internet access; and 8. Able to give informed consent and complete a gynecological examination and fill 7-day bladder diaries and questionnaires. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Present risk factors known to interfere with the effects of PFMT or with the PFM evaluation, including chronic constipation (as defined by the International Working Committee for Chronic Constipation), important pelvic organ prolapse (Baden-Walker score > stage 2), or any other comorbidities with a potential impact on the treatment (i.e. cognitive impairment, diabetes, active cancer, respiratory or cardiovascular conditions, etc); 2. Currently taking medication for UI or medications affecting skeletal muscles; 3. Considered obese with a body mass index (BMI) over 35; 4. Had an active urinary or vaginal infection in the past 3 months; 5. Underwent a change in hormonal replacement therapy in the past 6 months; 6. Received pelvic floor physiotherapy treatment or surgery for UI or pelvic organ prolapse in the past year

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
Group pelvic floor telerehabilitation
Multimodal group physiotherapy: 12 weeks of weekly group physiotherapy treatments including education and pelvic floor muscle exercises delivered online + home exercise program

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM) Montréal Quebec

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Université de Montréal Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal, Réseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissement (RQRV)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Cognitive function Cognitive function, evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (0-30 overall score, with scores of 24 and over indicating a normal cognitive function) at recruitment (PRE1)
Other Cognitive function Cognitive function, evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (0-30 overall score, with scores of 26 and over indicating a normal cognitive function) at recruitment (PRE1)
Other Sociodemographic characteristics Sociodemographic characteristics, evaluated using a home-made questionnaire recording age, weight, height, living situation, marital status, education, annual income, gynecological and medical history, medication and hormones prescriptions, smoking status, along with the Questionnaire for female Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) to determine UI type at recruitment (PRE1)
Other Signs of vaginal atrophy Signs of vaginal atrophy, observed during a gynecological evaluation, using the vaginal atrophy index (VAI) (6-15 overall score, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms of vaginal atrophy) at recruitment (PRE1)
Other Pelvic floor muscle function Gynecological evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function, using the Laycock's PERFECT score (PERFECT is an acronym with P = power of the pelvic floor muscle contraction, measured with the modified Oxford 6-point scale: 0=no contraction, 1=flicker, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good, and 5=strong; E = endurance of the pelvic floor muscle contraction, measured from 0 to 10 seconds, R = repetitions, measured from 0 to 10 contractions, F = fast contractions, measured as the number of fast maximal contractions over a period of 10 seconds, E = elevation of the posterior vaginal wall during the pelvic floor muscle contraction (yes/no), C = co-contraction of the lower abdominal muscles during the pelvic floor muscle contraction (yes/no), T = timing, with the presence of synchronous involuntary contraction of pelvic floor muscles on coughing (yes/no)) at recruitment (PRE1)
Other Signs and severity of pelvic prolapse Signs and severity of pelvic prolapse, observed during a gynecological evaluation, using the Baden-Walker prolapsus score (0-4 overall score, with higher scores indicating a higher severity) at recruitment (PRE1)
Primary number of UI episodes number of UI episodes, evaluated with a 7-day bladder diary at recruitment (PRE1)
Primary number of UI episodes number of UI episodes, evaluated with a 7-day bladder diary just before the intervention (PRE2)
Primary number of UI episodes number of UI episodes, evaluated with a 7-day bladder diary immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Primary number of UI episodes number of UI episodes, evaluated with a 7-day bladder diary 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Primary percentage reduction (%) in the number of UI episodes percentage reduction (%) in the number of UI episodes, evaluated with a 7-day bladder diary at recruitment (PRE1), just before the intervention (PRE2), immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST), 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on UI symptoms (ICIQ-UI) short form (0-21 overall score, with higher scores indicating more sever symptoms) at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on UI symptoms (ICIQ-UI) short form (0-21 overall score, with higher scores indicating more sever symptoms) just before the intervention (PRE2)
Secondary urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on UI symptoms (ICIQ-UI) short form (0-21 overall score, with higher scores indicating more sever symptoms) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on UI symptoms (ICIQ-UI) short form (0-21 overall score, with higher scores indicating more sever symptoms) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Changes in urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome urinary symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on UI symptoms (ICIQ-UI) short form (0-21 overall score, with higher scores indicating more sever symptoms) at recruitment (PRE1), just before the intervention (PRE2), immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST), 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) (0-45 score for bladder symptoms, 0-34 score for bowel symptoms, 0-15 score for pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, and 0-21 score for sexual function symptoms, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) (0-45 score for bladder symptoms, 0-34 score for bowel symptoms, 0-15 score for pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, and 0-21 score for sexual function symptoms, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) just before the intervention (PRE2)
Secondary bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) (0-45 score for bladder symptoms, 0-34 score for bowel symptoms, 0-15 score for pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, and 0-21 score for sexual function symptoms, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) (0-45 score for bladder symptoms, 0-34 score for bowel symptoms, 0-15 score for pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, and 0-21 score for sexual function symptoms, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Changes in bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms and degree to which these symptoms are troubling or bothersome, evaluated using the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) (0-45 score for bladder symptoms, 0-34 score for bowel symptoms, 0-15 score for pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, and 0-21 score for sexual function symptoms, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) at recruitment (PRE1), just before the intervention (PRE2), immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST), 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary UI-related quality of life UI-related quality of life, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms quality of life (ICIQ-LUTS QoL) (19-76 overall score with greater values indicating increased impact on quality of life) at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary UI-related quality of life UI-related quality of life, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms quality of life (ICIQ-LUTS QoL) (19-76 overall score with greater values indicating increased impact on quality of life) just before the intervention (PRE2)
Secondary UI-related quality of life UI-related quality of life, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms quality of life (ICIQ-LUTS QoL) (19-76 overall score with greater values indicating increased impact on quality of life) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary UI-related quality of life UI-related quality of life, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms quality of life (ICIQ-LUTS QoL) (19-76 overall score with greater values indicating increased impact on quality of life) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Changes in UI-related quality of life UI-related quality of life, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire module on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms quality of life (ICIQ-LUTS QoL) (19-76 overall score with greater values indicating increased impact on quality of life) at recruitment (PRE1), just before the intervention (PRE2), immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST), 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary UI-associated costs UI-associated costs, using the adapted Dowell-Bryant Incontinence Cost Index (DBICI) questionnaire at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary UI-associated costs UI-associated costs, using the adapted Dowell-Bryant Incontinence Cost Index (DBICI) questionnaire immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary UI-associated costs UI-associated costs, using the adapted Dowell-Bryant Incontinence Cost Index (DBICI) questionnaire 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary technology self-efficacy technology self-efficacy, evaluated using the Online Technologies Self-efficacy Scale (OTSES) questionnaire (30-120 overall score, with higher scores indicating lower level of technology self-efficacy) at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary technology self-efficacy technology self-efficacy, evaluated using the Online Technologies Self-efficacy Scale (OTSES) questionnaire (30-120 overall score, with higher scores indicating lower level of technology self-efficacy) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary technology self-efficacy technology self-efficacy, evaluated using the Online Technologies Self-efficacy Scale (OTSES) questionnaire (30-120 overall score, with higher scores indicating lower level of technology self-efficacy) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary UI related self-efficacy UI related self-efficacy, evaluated using the geriatric self-efficacy scale (GES) (0-120 overall score, with higher scores indicating higher level of self-efficacy related to urinary incontinence) at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary UI related self-efficacy UI related self-efficacy, evaluated using the geriatric self-efficacy scale (GES) (0-120 overall score, with higher scores indicating higher level of self-efficacy related to urinary incontinence) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary UI related self-efficacy UI related self-efficacy, evaluated using the geriatric self-efficacy scale (GES) (0-120 overall score, with higher scores indicating higher level of self-efficacy related to urinary incontinence) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Pelvic floor muscles related self-efficacy Pelvic floor muscles related self-efficacy, evaluated using the Broome's self-efficacy scale (14 items with responses ranging 0-100 for part A and 9 items with responses ranging 0-100 for part B; an overall mean self-efficacy score is calculated, also ranging 0-100) at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary Pelvic floor muscles related self-efficacy Pelvic floor muscles related self-efficacy, evaluated using the Broome's self-efficacy scale (14 items with responses ranging 0-100 for part A and 9 items with responses ranging 0-100 for part B; an overall mean self-efficacy score is calculated, also ranging 0-100) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary Pelvic floor muscles related self-efficacy Pelvic floor muscles related self-efficacy, evaluated using the Broome's self-efficacy scale (14 items with responses ranging 0-100 for part A and 9 items with responses ranging 0-100 for part B; an overall mean self-efficacy score is calculated, also ranging 0-100) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Vaginal atrophy symptoms Vaginal atrophy symptoms, evaluated using the Atrophy Symptom Questionnaire (ASQ) (0-15 overall score, with higher scores indicating higher severity of vaginal atrophy symptoms) at recruitment (PRE1)
Secondary Vaginal atrophy symptoms Vaginal atrophy symptoms, evaluated using the Atrophy Symptom Questionnaire (ASQ) (0-15 overall score, with higher scores indicating higher severity of vaginal atrophy symptoms) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary Vaginal atrophy symptoms Vaginal atrophy symptoms, evaluated using the Atrophy Symptom Questionnaire (ASQ) (0-15 overall score, with higher scores indicating higher severity of vaginal atrophy symptoms) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Patient reported improvement and satisfaction Patient reported improvement and satisfaction, evaluated using the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) index, a single-item tool to capture perceived satisfaction with treatment: "satisfied" (does not need other treatments); "unsatisfied" (would like another treatment for UI) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary Patient reported improvement and satisfaction Patient reported improvement and satisfaction, evaluated using the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) index, a single-item tool to capture perceived satisfaction with treatment: "satisfied" (does not need other treatments); "unsatisfied" (would like another treatment for UI) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Feasibility/Acceptability (reach) Reach aspect of feasibility/acceptability, evaluated using attendance to weekly sessions through intervention completion, for 12 weeks
Secondary Feasibility/Acceptability (fidelity) Fidelity aspect of feasibility/acceptability, evaluated using the integrity of the GROUP program elements delivered by the physiotherapist during each session (checklist) through intervention completion, for 12 weeks
Secondary Feasibility/Acceptability (dose) Dose aspect feasibility/acceptability, evaluated using adherence to home exercises (exercises journal) through intervention completion, for 12 weeks
Secondary Feasibility/Acceptability (perceived usability of the technology) Perceived usability of the technology from the patients' experience as an aspect of feasibility/acceptability, evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) (0-100 overall score, with higher scores indicating a higher usability) immediately after the 12-week intervention (POST)
Secondary Feasibility/Acceptability (perceived usability of the technology) Perceived usability of the technology from the patients' experience as an aspect of feasibility/acceptability, evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) (0-100 overall score, with higher scores indicating a higher usability) 6 months after the end of the 12-week intervention (FOLLOW-UP)
Secondary Potential challenges and satisfaction with the program from the patients' perspective Potential challenges and satisfaction with the program from the patients' perspective, evaluated during focus groups or interviews using an interview guide developed from the seven dimensions of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA), three of the five Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains and additional open-ended questions on satisfaction immediately after the intervention (POST)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05534412 - A Practice-Based Intervention To Improve Care for a Diverse Population Of Women With Urinary Incontinence N/A
Recruiting NCT05515198 - Improving Care for Women With Urinary Incontinence (EMPOWER) N/A
Completed NCT04071301 - Collection of Real-life Measurement Data for TENA SmartCare Change Indicator in Subjects With Urinary Incontinence N/A
Completed NCT03623880 - Enhancing Behavioral Treatment for Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders N/A
Recruiting NCT05880862 - Comparative Effectiveness of Initial OAB Treatment Options Among Older Women at High Risk of Falls Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04159467 - Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Urinary Incontinence Reports in Obese Women Undergoing a Low Calorie Diet N/A
Completed NCT05485922 - Performance of a Single-use Intermittent Micro-hole Zone Catheter N/A
Completed NCT06268782 - The Effectiveness of an Online Exercise Program on Well-being of Postpartum Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03027986 - Evaluation of a Postural Rehabilitation Program Based on Sensory-motor Control in Men With Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT02490917 - ACT™ Balloons Versus Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AMS800™) for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT02529371 - Pre-Marketing Feasibility Evaluation of the UriCap-RM - Urine Collection in Hospitalized Male Patients N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT02530372 - Feasibility of the UriCap-F for Urine Collection in Hospitalized Women N/A
Completed NCT02600676 - Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Children With Enuresis N/A
Completed NCT02549729 - Effect of the Pelvic Floor Training in Postmenopausal Women With or Without Hormonal Therapy N/A
Completed NCT02338726 - Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Quality of Life in Elderly Women - a Population-based Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT02239796 - Feasibility Controlled Trial of Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Stroke Related Urinary Incontinence N/A
Completed NCT02368262 - Prevalence of Incontinence and Risk Factors in Children With Cerebral Palsy N/A
Completed NCT01942681 - Female Patients With Signs of uRgE and Stress Urinary Incontinence Study of Propiverine Hydrochloride N/A
Recruiting NCT01804153 - Stem Cells Tratment for the Local Feminine Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment (HULPURO) Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT01520948 - Behavioral Therapy to Treat Urinary Symptoms in Parkinson Disease Phase 3