View clinical trials related to Urinary Incontinence, Stress.
Filter by:A prospective, multi-center study of the AdVance Male Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence. The purpose of this study is to obtain surgical technique data for use in physician education and training and to collect early clinical outcomes data for future publication. This study is not designed to statistically demonstrate safety and efficacy of the device.
This is a post approval study of Coaptite® in the treatment of female urinary incontinence.
The aim of this prospective, randomized study of Bulkamid treatment is to investigate the efficacy of Bulkamid treatment in women with urinary stress incontinence not suitable to TVT-procedure because of suspected ISD.
The purpose of this study is to assess the delay between the detection (by mechanomyography-MMG) of rectus abdominis contraction and the detection of cough in cough effort.
Stress urinary incontinence is the most common type of female incontinence. The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback has been already proved in many studies. But intravaginal probe is one of the limitation. So, the purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal biofeedback device with pelvic floor muscle training.
The purpose of this study is to obtain surgical technique data for use in physician education and training and to collect early clinical outcomes data for future publication.
The objective was to observe the satisfaction of local anesthesia during the implantation of the TVT-SECUR for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, with the use of questionnaires completed by the patients, and to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of the sling, with a comparison of the two techniques of implantation: the 'U-Method' and the 'Hammock' technique.
This study is a multi-center, global study that will assess the effectiveness and patient satisfaction of the male incontinence sling 12 months after implant as well as the safety profile of the product.
This is a clinical investigation approved by US FDA and Canadian Health Authority to study the safety and potential effectiveness of the autologous muscle cells for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
The aim of this study is to assess whether the Miniarc suburethral sling is equivalent to the TVT in the treatment of women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). If equivalence is proven, the advantages to women with USI will be potentially significant since the Miniarc may be carried out as an office based procedure, negating the need for an anaesthetic and hospital admission. The investigators null hypothesis is that there is no difference in subjective or objective outcome between the TVT and the Miniarc in the treatment of USI. Eligible women will be initially assessed with a full history and examination, King's Health Questionnaire and twin channel subtraction cystometry. They will be randomised (using a series of numbered opaque envelopes) to undergo either the TVT or Miniarc. Follow up will be at 6 weeks, with a subjective outcome measure and at 6 months with a repeat subjective assessment and repeat twin channel cystometry.