Urinary Catheterization Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Single-blind, Cross-over, Single-centre Study in Healthy Volunteers Evaluating Subject Perception and Friction at Withdrawal of Catheters With Different Activation Times Compared to a Reference Catheter
NCT number | NCT00748033 |
Other study ID # | YA-CLO-0005 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | August 2008 |
Est. completion date | August 2008 |
Verified date | April 2021 |
Source | Wellspect HealthCare |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the subject's perception (separately for each randomized catheter) of practicing catheterization when using catheters with sodium chloride in wetting solution (using two different activation times) with a standard reference catheter. The hypothesis is that the subjects' perception of catheterization is the same or more positive when using the test catheters compared to the reference catheter.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 25 |
Est. completion date | August 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Provision of written informed consent - Healthy volunteer - Male aged 18 years or over Exclusion Criteria: - Known or suspected, current impairment of and/or decreased urethral sensibility - History of urethral morbidity - History of urinary tract infection within three months, or ongoing symptomatic urinary tract infection - Use of medications that may affect the urethra´s dryness (anti-cholinergic drugs or cortisone) - Current drug, alcohol or other substance abuse - Other significant disease or condition (e.g. benign prostate hypertrophy, other prostatic lesions), which may interfere with treatment and/or evaluation - Allergy to antibiotics suspected poor compliance with the protocol during the complete study period |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Sweden | Karolinska Trial Alliance A2:01, Karolinska University Hospital | Stockholm |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Wellspect HealthCare |
Sweden,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Subjects' Perception at Insertion of Test Catheter Activated for 5 Seconds, Compared to Reference. | The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding insertion?'. | A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Primary | Subjects' Perception at Insertion of Test Catheter Activated for 24 Hours, Compared to Reference. | The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding insertion?'. | A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Primary | Subjects' Perception at Withdrawal of Test Catheter Activated for 5 Seconds, Compared to Reference. | The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding withdrawal?'. | A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Primary | Subjects' Perception at Withdrawal of Test Catheter Activated for 24 Hours, Compared to Reference. | The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding withdrawal?'. | A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Secondary | Comparison of the Perception at Insertion Between 5s and 24h Activation Times. Times | Comparison of the perception at insertion between the catheters with 5s and 24h activation times. | A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Secondary | Comparison of the Perception at Withdrawal Between 5s and 24h Activation Times. | Comparison of the perception at withdrawal between the catheters with 5s and 24h activation times. | A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Secondary | Test of Carry-over Effect at Insertion, Mean Rating of Perception on a Scale of 0 to 5 | The subjects perception of the catheterization will be classified as very negative, slightly negative, same, slightly positive or very positive.
The mean perception of the 5s and the 24h catheter is calculated for each subject. The perception was measured on a scale from 1 (=very negative compared to the reference catheter) to 5 (=very positive compared to the reference catheter) and a 3 indicating that the perception was the same for the test catheter as for the reference catheter. Before doing any statistics all answers were reduced by 3 resulting in values from -2 (=very negative compared to the reference catheter) to +2 (=very positive compared to the reference catheter) and a 0 indicating that the perception was the same for the test catheter as for the reference catheter. |
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Secondary | Test of Carry-over Effect at Withdrawal, Mean Rating of Perception on a Scale of 0 to 5 | They had five alternative answers.The subjects perception of the catheterization will be classified as very negative, slightly negative, same, slightly positive or very positive.
The mean perception of the 5s and the 24h catheter is calculated for each subject. The perception was measured on a scale from 1 (=very negative compared to the reference catheter) to 5 (=very positive compared to the reference catheter) and a 3 indicating that the perception was the same for the test catheter as for the reference catheter. Before doing any statistics all answers were reduced by 3 resulting in values from -2 (=very negative compared to the reference catheter) to +2 (=very positive compared to the reference catheter) and a 0 indicating that the perception was the same for the test catheter as for the reference catheter. |
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day. | |
Secondary | Tension Test System: Ref-24h Mean | Tension test system (friction) at withdrawal. Comparison between the reference catheter and the 24 hours activation time. The MEAN for the withdrawal friction was measured in Newton (N). | The Tension test system was performed while withdrawing the catheters up to 5 seconds. | |
Secondary | Tension Test System: Ref-24h Work | Tension test system (friction) at withdrawal. Comparison between the reference catheter and the 24 hours activation time. The WORK for the withdrawal friction was measured in Joule (J). | The Tension test system was performed while withdrawing the catheters up to 5 seconds. | |
Secondary | Tension Test System: Ref-5s MEAN | Tension test system (friction) at withdrawal. Comparison between the reference catheter and the 5 seconds activation time. The MEAN for the withdrawal friction was measured in Newton (N). | The Tension test system was performed while withdrawing the catheters, up to 5 seconds. | |
Secondary | Tension Test System: Ref-5s WORK | Tension test system (friction) at withdrawal. Comparison between the reference catheter and the 5 seconds activation time. The WORK for the withdrawal friction was measured in Joule (J). | The Tension test system was performed while withdrawing the catheters, up to 5 seconds. | |
Secondary | Tension Test System: 24h-5s | Tension test system (friction) at withdrawal. Comparison between the catheters with 24h activation time and the 5 seconds activation time.
The MEAN for the withdrawal friction was measured in Newton (N). |
The Tension test system was performed while withdrawing the catheters, up to 5 seconds. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT00804557 -
Efficacy And Safety Of The Uro-Ease® Urinary Catheter During Clean Intermittent Catheterization
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03459963 -
Risks and Benefits of Urinary Catheter in Elective Cesarean Section
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT06217016 -
Effect of ICCAUT Strategy on Postoperative Urinary Retention After Radical Rectal Cancer Surgery (ICCAUT-2)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06241703 -
Effect of ICCAUT Strategy on Postoperative Urinary Dysfunction After Radical Rectal Cancer Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04159077 -
REduction of Post-Operative Urinary Retention With Tamsulosin Versus Placebo (REPOURT- P) Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00753298 -
A Randomized, Fully-blinded Parallel Groups Study of Catheter Materials Used for Clean Intermittent Catheterisation
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01063452 -
Impact of Atkinson Product Design Urinary Slide Valve Versus Standard Catheter Drainage System on Social Functioning
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05710731 -
The Urinary Catheterization Training on Skills, Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Nursing Students
|
N/A |