Urinary Bladder, Overactive Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Efficacy of Oxybutynin Chloride OROS in Patient-Reported Outcomes With Dose Escalation in Korean Overactive Bladder Patients
Verified date | October 2013 |
Source | Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Korea: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of oxybutynin chloride oral osmotic therapeutic system (OROS) on patient-reported outcomes after 12 weeks of treatment by dose escalation in participants with overactive bladder.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 345 |
Est. completion date | June 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Participants who fulfilled all of the following criteria in their micturition charts completed for 3 days prior to visit 2 (Baseline): mean voiding frequency greater than or equal to 8 times per 24 hours and mean frequency of urinary urgency greater than or equal to 2 times per 24 hours (urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate and a urinary sensation scale score greater than or equal to 3 in the micturition chart) - Participants with overactive bladder symptoms lasting for 3 months or longer prior to study initiation - Participants who were capable of completing micturition chart and survey questionnaires and provided informed consent to complete them - Participants who could sign on the informed consent form after fully listening to and understanding about characteristics, risks and benefits of the study Exclusion Criteria: - Participants with stress urinary incontinence (not able to control bladder actions) or participants with complicated incontinence dominantly presenting stress urinary incontinence when judging based on medical history - Participants with a hepatic (pertaining to liver) or renal (pertaining to kidneys) disease indicating serum aspartate transaminase (AST [SGOT]), alanine transaminase (ALT [SGPT]), alkaline phosphatase or creatinnine concentration twice or more of normal upper limit - Participants contraindicated to use anticholinergics including uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma (increased pressure inside the eye that causes visual problems), urinary retention or gastrointestinal tract retention - Participants experiencing a symptom of acute urinary tract infection (UTI) during the run-in period - Participants with recurrent UTI who had medical history of treatment for UTI symptom 5 times or more in the past one year |
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Goal | Goal achievement was measured by using the 6-point Likert scale (0=not achieved at all and 5=completely achieved). Achievement of treatment goal was defined by a score of 4 or 5 in the Likert scale. Percentage of participants who achieved their treatment goal defined at Baseline (for a maximum of 3 items among the 10 items including incontinence, urinary urgency, frequent urination, nocturnal frequent urination, tenesmus, general health, life habit, activity, pain/pressure pain, and sexual function) was reported. | Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Urinary Urgency at Week 12 | Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by urinary urgency (strong micturition desire indicated) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported. | Baseline and Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Frequent Daytime Urination at Week 12 | Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by daytime frequent urination (frequent urination was required more than the frequency desired during daytime) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported. | Baseline and Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Frequent Nighttime Urination at Week 12 | Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by nighttime frequent urination (waking up from sleep in order to void urine at nighttime [period from time of going to bed to time planned to wake up in the morning]) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported. | Baseline and Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Urge Urinary Incontinence at Week 12 | Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by urge urinary incontinence (involuntary voiding or urinary leakage due to sudden micturition desire, not by sneezing, coughing or laughing) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported. | Baseline and Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Patient's Perception of Symptom Improvement (PPSI) Score for Overactive Bladder | Participant's perception about decrease in the most bothering symptom of overactive bladder (defined at Baseline) was evaluated by using visual analogue scale (VAS) at Week 12. The total score range was 0 to 100 where 0=symptom disappeared and 100=symptom unchanged or worsened compared to Baseline. | Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Response to Patient's Perception of Treatment Benefit (PPTB) Questionnaire | The PPTB was used to assess participant's perception about treatment benefit and satisfaction of the study drug. Regarding benefit, participants indicated whether they had any benefit obtained from the treatment. If yes, then the participants indicated whether it was weak benefit or strong benefit. Regarding satisfaction, participants indicated whether they were satisfied with the treatment. If yes, then they indicated if the treatment was slightly satisfactory or very satisfactory. If no, then they indicated if the treatment was slightly unsatisfactory or very unsatisfactory. | Week 2, 4, 6 and 12 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Response to Patient's Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Questionnaire | Participant's perception about bladder condition was evaluated by using self administered PPBC questionnaire. Participants answered "Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment?" on a 6-point scale: 1= not problematic at all, 2=mild problem, 3=more or less a mild problem, 4=moderate problem, 5=severe problem and 6=very severe problem. | Baseline and Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Score at Week 6 and 12 | The OAB-q was used to evaluate influence of overactive bladder symptom on health-related quality of life (HRQL). It consisted of 2 parts: Symptom bother (6 items) evaluating how much symptoms related to overactive bladder were bothering in the last 4 weeks and HRQL (13 items) evaluating how general symptoms related to the bladder influenced life in the last 4 weeks. Each item was rated on 6-point Likert scale: 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Total score range: 6 to 36 for symptom bother and 13 to 78 for HRQL. Transformed score calculated as ([Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score]/range)*100 for symptom bother where higher score indicates greater symptom bother and as ([Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score]/Raw score range)*100 for HRQL where higher scores indicate better HRQL. Transformed score range: 0-100 for both, symptom bother and HRQL. | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or early discontinuation (ED) | No |
Secondary | Mean Voiding Frequency | Mean voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean daytime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total daytime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Mean nighttime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total nighttime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Nighttime voiding was defined as voiding during the sleep cycle. | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Voiding Frequency at Week 6 and 12 | Mean voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean daytime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total daytime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Mean nighttime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total nighttime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Nighttime voiding was defined as voiding during the sleep cycle. Percent change was calculated as (change value/Baseline value)*100. | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED | No |
Secondary | Frequency of Urinary Urgency and Urinary Incontinence | Urinary urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate. It was rated by participant on 5-point scale (1=no urinary urgency and 5=urge urinary incontinence). Total frequency of urinary incontinence (UI) for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of incontinence divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean frequency of urinary urgency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of urinary urgency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Urinary urgency was defined as voiding with urinary sensation scale score greater than or equal to 3. | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of Urinary Urgency and Urinary Incontinence at Week 6 and 12 | Urinary urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate. It was rated by participant on 5-point scale (1=no urinary urgency and 5=urge urinary incontinence). Total frequency of UI for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of incontinence divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean frequency of urinary urgency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of urinary urgency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Urinary urgency was defined as voiding with urinary sensation scale score greater than or equal to 3. Percent change was calculated as (change value/Baseline value)*100. | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED | No |
Secondary | Mean Severity of Urinary Urgency at Urination | Urinary urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate. It was rated by participant on 5-point scale (1=no urinary urgency, 2=light urinary urgency, 3=moderate urinary urgency, 4=severe urinary urgency and 5=urge urinary incontinence). Mean severity of urinary urgency at urination was calculated as sum of all degrees of urinary urgency measured divided by the voiding frequency. | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED | No |
Secondary | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score for Dry Mouth | Severity of dry mouth was evaluated in participants by using VAS: how much dry mouth they have experienced in the past one week. The total score range was 0 (no dry mouth) to 100 (unimaginably most severe dry mouth). | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED | Yes |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score for Dry Mouth at Week 6 and 12 | Severity of dry mouth was evaluated in participants by using VAS: how much dry mouth they experienced in the past one week. The total score range was 0 (no dry mouth) to 100 (unimaginably most severe dry mouth). Percent change was calculated as (change value/Baseline value)*100. | Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06201013 -
Efficacy and Safety of Vitamin D in the Treatment of OAB-wet in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05880862 -
Comparative Effectiveness of Initial OAB Treatment Options Among Older Women at High Risk of Falls
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04807920 -
BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02385500 -
Fesoterodine on Urgency Episodes in Parkinson's Disease Population
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02477241 -
Brain Areas Involved in Bladder Filling and Contraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01698138 -
Prevention of Bladder Dysfunction in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00527033 -
A Study of YM178 in Patients With Symptomatic Overactive Bladder
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00368706 -
A Double-Blind, Paralleled Study Comparing Efficacy/Safety of Solifenacin to Tolterodine in Overactive Bladder Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04305743 -
Post-procedural Pain Associated With 5 Versus 20 Intravesical Injections of Onabotulinumtoxin A
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03681678 -
Laser Therapy for Treatment of Urogenital Symptoms in Women
|
||
Completed |
NCT01655069 -
A Study to Investigate How Safe and Effective Solifenacin Solution is in Treating Children/Adolescents With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder (OAB) Who Completed Study 905-CL-076
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01558856 -
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Neuromodulation Tests in the Treatment of Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01521767 -
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability Study
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01381120 -
Therapeutic Merit of Solifenacin in the Mitigation of Ureteral Stent-induced Pain and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01194999 -
Evaluating the Change of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Women Post Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01157377 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of AGN-214868 in Patients With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01262391 -
Single-dose Study to Assess Pharmacokinetics of Solifenacin Succinate Suspension in Children and Adolescents
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04528784 -
Feasibility Study of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Urinary Symptoms in People With Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02849418 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of GSK1358820 in Japanese Patients With Urinary Incontinence Due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05968885 -
Evaluation the Efficacy Between Botox Injection and Combination Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Detrusor Overactivity
|
Phase 4 |