Clinical Trials Logo

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1 ·  Next »

NCT ID: NCT06350864 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

HFNC Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Prolonged Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the ICU

Start date: January 20, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Conventional supplemental oxygen therapy (COT) during upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy via nasal catheter is considered the standard practice in maintenance of oxygenation and prevention of hypoxia. However, it is still unclear if this oxygen delivery method is optimal in a prolonged (more than 15 minutes) procedure in patients admitted to the ICU. Because of shortage of data in this concern, this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial study will aim to evaluate and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy versus COT in patients who will undergo prolonged either diagnostic or therapeutic UGI endoscopy in the intensive care unit (ICU) .

NCT ID: NCT06297954 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Usefulness of Metoclopramide to Improve Endoscopic Visualization in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Start date: March 16, 2023
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study will be conducted, including all patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, defined as vomiting blood or black bowel movements, within 12 hours prior to admission. Patients will be randomized to receive intravenous metoclopramide 20 mg or placebo, a placebo is a look-alike substance that contains no active drug. Then endoscopy will be performed in the following 120 minutes, evaluating endoscopic visualization with the modified Avgerinos scale.

NCT ID: NCT06192355 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Single-use Versus Reusable Gastroscopes in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

OneScopeII
Start date: March 27, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Controlled-randomized trial evaluating single-use versus reusable gastroscopes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

NCT ID: NCT06077916 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Gastric CLEANsing by Intravenous AZithromycin in Urgent Endoscopy

CLEAN-AZ
Start date: October 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will test the hypothesis that azythromycin is efficient and safe in cleansing the upper gastrointestinal tract for endoscopic examination in the case of acute bleeding.

NCT ID: NCT04902248 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

OTSC vs. Angiographic Embolization in Patients With Refractory Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Start date: November 27, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In the management of patients with acute upper non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, further bleeding is the most important adverse factor predictive of mortality. In the United Kingdom Audit on acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, clinical evidence of further bleeding was reported in 13% of patients following the first endoscopy and 27% of them died. The use of OTSC has emerged as an alternative before angiographic embolization(TAE) which is often considered most definitive. We propose to define the algorithm in the management of patients with refractory bleeding from their peptic ulcers or other non variceal causes. We hypothesize that endoscopic use of OTSC compares favourably with TAE and both lead to similar outcomes. An equivalence of the two modalities may mean that endoscopic application of OTSC should be attempted before TAE as often we need to document further bleeds with endoscopy and a second treatment should be instituted at the same time.

NCT ID: NCT03840057 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Metoclopramide, Azithromycin, or Nondrug Pretreatment for UGIB to Reduce Second Endoscopy

MANPURSE
Start date: July 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Early endoscopy is an integral part of the management plan for patients presenting with clinical signs of severe or ongoing UGIB. An accurate endoscopic diagnosis and successful endoscopic hemostasis is highly dependent on adequate visualization of the entire gastric mucosa. Metoclopramide has previously been investigated as a prokinetic agent to aid gastric emptying prior to endoscopy, but its widespread adoption is limited by a lack of high quality clinical evidence as well as concerns regarding side effects. Erythromycin is currently the only prokinetic agent recommended by the American and the European guidelines for use in selected patients in order to reduce the need for second endoscopy. Its clinical application, however, is limited by risk of arrhythmia, significant drug interactions, and frequent drug shortages. Azithromycin is structurally related to erythromycin, but is devoid of most adverse side effects associated with erythromycin use. Early evidence suggests that azithromycin may be an effective alternative to erythromycin in the treatment of gastroparesis. The current study, an interventional, randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, is primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of azithromycin as a prokinetic agent in the management of UGIB. It is also aimed to further evaluate the role of metoclopramide as a prokinetic agent in this setting. Outcome measures to be collected in this study include the need for secondary endoscopy, overall mortality, transfusion requirement, length of stay, requirement for surgery, and incidence of adverse side effects. Results from this study would help identify a safe, effective, and readily available prokinetic agent to be used prior to endoscopy.

NCT ID: NCT03785080 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Non-warfarin Oral AntiCoagulant Resumption After Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

NOAC-GAP
Start date: March 11, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Current clinical society guidelines and statements are non-specific and relatively open-ended regarding the optimal timing to restart non-warfarin oral anticoagulant (NOAC) after gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who require the prophylactic medication for stroke prevention. These patients are at increased risk for devastating future thromboembolic events including stroke if NOAC is not resumed promptly, whilst premature resumption of anticoagulants can result in recurrent GIB, haemorrhage, anaemia, myocardial ischaemia and infarction in those with ischaemic heart disease, and even death. However, the question as to how early a NOAC can be safely restarted after acute GIB has not been previously answered, and there remains an important knowledge gap.

NCT ID: NCT03624517 Recruiting - Liver Cirrhoses Clinical Trials

Comparison of 24-hours Versus 72-hours of Octreotide Infusion in Preventing Early Rebleed From Esophageal Varices

LOVARB
Start date: September 19, 2018
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of 24-hour vs 72-hour octreotide infusion after variceal banding in cirrhotic patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

NCT ID: NCT03090945 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Pediatric Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding Registry

TRIAGE
Start date: May 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The goal of this study is to identify significant clinical and laboratory risk factors in pediatric patients with significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This is defined as bleeding that necessitates an upper endoscopic evaluation to either diagnose or treat upper GI bleeding during their hospital admission. If a predictive/risk stratification relationship exists, these data could permit a more effective triaging and intervention scheme in pediatric patients presenting with complaints of gastrointestinal bleeding. In addition we want to get a better understanding of the re-bleeding rate after endoscopic therapy for upper GI bleeding and if there are any identifiable risk factors for re-bleeding. Lastly we want to understand best practice management for upper GI bleeding.

NCT ID: NCT01275937 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

A Double Blind Study Comparing Two Doses of IV Esomeprazole After Successful Endoscopic Therapy

Start date: August 2011
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

A bleeding peptic ulcer remains a serious medical problem with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic therapy significantly reduces further bleeding, surgery, and mortality in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and is now recommended as the first hemostatic modality for these patients. In the past few years, adjuvant use of a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after endoscopic therapy has been endorsed in some studies. However, low dose of PPI has also been supported in the management of these patients. The investigators enroll 130 patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels in this study. They are randomly assigned as 40 mg/day or 160mg/day IV nexium group. All patients receive successful endoscopic therapy with heater probe or hemoclip placement. In the low dose group (N=65), 40 mg IV Nexium daily is given for three days. Thereafter, the patients receive 40 mg nexium orally daily for two months. In the large dose group (N=65), 160 mg/day continuous infusion is given for three days. Thereafter, the patients receive 40 mg nexium orally daily for two months. The primary end point is recurrent bleeding before discharge and within 14 days. At day 14, volume of blood transfused, number of surgeries performed, and the mortality rates of the two groups are compared as well.