Type I Hypersensitivity Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Double-Blind Phase IIa Study to Demonstrate the Contribution of MPL® to Tyrosine Adsorbed Birch + Hazel + Alder Pollen Allergoid (Tree MATA) With a Single-Blind Portion to Evaluate the Residual Allergenicity in Skin Test in Volunteers Allergic to Birch and Hazel and Alder Pollen
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), the administration of gradually increasing quantities
of an allergen extract to an allergic patient, is a curative approach which directly treats
the underlying allergic disease. Tree MATA MPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal
specific immunotherapy for patients with an allergy to tree pollen (hay fever).
The tolerability and immunogenicity of Tree MATA (allergen modified with glutaraldehyde and
adsorbed to tyrosine) with and without MPL adjuvant (monophosphoryl lipid A, extracted from
a bacterial cell surface) is being investigated in this double-blind, randomized Phase IIa
study in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Additionally, this study will assess residual allergenicity of the modified birch and hazel
and alder pollen in the product Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing in volunteers
allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Allergic rhinitis is a nasal inflammatory disorder initiated by an immunoglobulin-E (IgE)
mediated hypersensitivity to allergens. When a patient is exposed to an allergen to which he
or she is sensitive, the allergen cross-links with the IgE antibody, which is bound to the
surface of tissue mast cells. This cross-linking then triggers the release of
proinflammatory substances, such as histamine and eicosanoids, and is known as the early
response. In a skin prick test, this reaction produces a wheal-and-flare response. Normally,
systemic exposure to an allergen also leads to the more prolonged late reaction, in which
eosinophils, basophils, and activated T cells are recruited to the site of exposure. The
recruited T cells also secrete inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) and
IL-5, typically associated with helper T cells type 2 (TH2), which further propagate the
inflammatory cascade. Typically, the early response occurs within 15 to 30 minutes (but as
quickly as a few seconds) and usually resolves within 1 to 3 hours, and the late response
occurs within 6 to 12 hours and resolves in 24 hours.
Allergic vaccination (AV), also referred to as immunotherapy or allergen-specific
immunotherapy (SIT), is a curative approach that is available for allergic diseases, which
directly treats the underlying disease. AV is the practice of administering gradually
increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient to ameliorate the
symptoms associated with the subsequent exposure to the causative allergen. AV is believed
to exert its beneficial effects on the immune system, at least in part, by modifying the
T-lymphocyte response to subsequent natural allergen exposure. AV has been shown to inhibit
both early and late responses to allergen exposure. AV acts on T cells to modify peripheral
and mucosal TH2 responses to an allergen in favor of helper T cell type 1 (TH1) responses.
One of the hallmarks of successful AV is the redressing of a "healthy" TH1/TH2-balance.
Although efficacious, immunotherapy is generally considered a long-term disease modifying
measure that requires months to years of treatment, entails multiple injection regimens and
involves some risk for adverse immune reactions.
Allergy Therapeutics (AT) has developed formulations over the years to increase both the
safety and efficacy of such treatment. In particular, the allergen extract has been
chemically modified with glutaraldehyde and formulated with L-tyrosine to act as a depot
adjuvant and provide a slow release of the allergens or modified allergens. This increases
the safety profile and enhances the efficacy-associated immunological changes. Efficacy
could be further improved by adding the immunological adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL).
Tree MATA MPL is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only three
escalating dose injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use. It is
designed to have all of the current advantages of an allergy vaccine, which can modify the
underlying disease process, as opposed to pharmacological control, which treats only the
symptoms. The vaccine will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass
of unmodified allergen extract due to the propensity of the unmodified allergen extract to
cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with
IgE antibody.
The tolerability and immunogenicity of Tree MATA with and without MPL adjuvant is being
investigated in this double-blind, randomized Phase IIa study in volunteers allergic to
birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Additionally, this study will assess residual allergenicity of the modified birch and hazel
and alder pollen in the product Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing in volunteers
allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Pharmacodynamics Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double-Blind, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00133159 -
Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Grass Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Grass Pollen
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00133146 -
Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Grass Pollen Allergy Vaccine
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00387478 -
Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Tree MATAMPL,Tree MATA, and Placebo in Patients With Birch-Induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00414141 -
Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Grass MATA MPL
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00258635 -
Investigation of Safety+Efficacy of Different Doses of RagweedMATAMPL;Assessment of Residual Allergenicity Using Skin Prick Test
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00325338 -
Follow-up Investigation of Efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL,and Placebo in Patients With Ragweed-induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00109759 -
Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Tyrosine Adsorbed Ragweed Pollen Allergoid With MPL (Monophosphoryl Lipid A)
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00110786 -
Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Ragweed MATAMPL, Pollinex-R and Placebo in Patients With Ragweed Allergy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00423787 -
Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Ragweed MATA MPL
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00104377 -
Induction of Immunogenicity With Different Doses of Grass MATA in Subjects Allergic to Grass and Rye Pollen
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00104390 -
Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Grass/Rye Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00116285 -
Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Ragweed Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) Using Skin Prick Testing
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00118612 -
Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Tree Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Tree Pollen
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00113750 -
Induction of Immunogenicity With Different Doses of TreeMATA in Subjects Allergic to Tree Pollen
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00241410 -
Safety, Immunological Effect and Efficacy of the Combined Application of MPL and Grass Pollen Allergen
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00107705 -
Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Tree (Birch, Hazel, and Alder) Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing
|
Phase 1 |