Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00107705
Other study ID # TreeMATAMPL101
Secondary ID P1DP05001
Status Completed
Phase Phase 1
First received April 7, 2005
Last updated June 16, 2010
Start date April 2005
Est. completion date May 2005

Study information

Verified date June 2010
Source Allergy Therapeutics
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Canada: Health Canada
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the residual allergenicity of Tree MATA (modified pollen allergen tyrosine adsorbate) by skin prick testing. This is done by a comparison of the wheal response after skin prick testing with aqueous native and modified allergen, modified tyrosine adsorbed allergen and Tree MATA MPL (modified tyrosine adsorbed + MPL [Monophosphoryl Lipid A]).


Description:

Tree MATA MPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting tree pollens. MPL (Monophosphoryl Lipid A), a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell wall of Salmonella minnesota, is included in the product formulation as an adjuvant to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to a TH1-like profile.

The tree pollen extract is modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. This modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody, thus reducing the risk of side effects. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivities is not seen.

The purpose of this study is to assess residual allergenicity of the modified tree pollen in Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 12
Est. completion date May 2005
Est. primary completion date
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- The subject must sign the study consent form prior to any screening procedures being performed.

- If the volunteer is female of childbearing potential, she must demonstrate a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to remain abstinent or use an effective method of birth control or use a hormonal contraceptive

- The subject must demonstrate a positive skin prick test to Birch, Hazel and Alder pollen allergen extract

- The subject must demonstrate a positive skin prick test to positive histamine control

- The subject must demonstrate a negative skin prick test to negative control

- The subject must demonstrate a specific IgE for Birch, Hazel and Alder as documented by a RAST (radioallergosorbent test), or equivalent test

- The subject must have clinically acceptable results from the screening procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

- History or presence of acute or subacute atopic dermatitis, chronic dermatitis, urticaria factitia, or urticaria due to physical/chemical influence or any other skin conditions which might interfere with the interpretation of skin prick test results

- Visual inspection of the forearms indicates potential problems with the conduct or interpretation of the skin prick tests; both forearms must be available for testing

- Subject has asthma or other lower respiratory tract condition

- History or presence of diabetes, cancer or any clinically significant cardiac, metabolic, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, hematologic, neurologic or psychiatric diseases or disorders

- Any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at Visit 1

- Clinically relevant sensitivity to any common perennial allergen: house dust mites, molds, epithelia (cat, dog, and horse), grass mix

- Clinically relevant symptoms due to an IgE - mediated allergy at screening and before inclusion to the treatment period.

- Secondary alteration at the affected organ.

- History of auto-immune diseases or rheumatoid diseases

- Subject has a medical condition that prohibits the use of adrenalin

- Subject has disorder of tyrosine metabolism

- Subject with diseases interfering with the immune response and have received medication, which could influence the results of this study

- Subject has acute or chronic infection

- History of anaphylaxis

- History of angioedema

- Subjects determined by the Investigator to have any medical condition that could jeopardize their health or prejudice the results

- History of hypersensitivity to the excipients of the study medication

- History of immunotherapy with tree allergen extracts

- Current therapy with ß-blockers

- Currently receiving anti-allergy medication or other drugs with antihistaminic activity

- Subject has a positive drugs of abuse screen at Visit 1

- Subject participated in a clinical trial with an investigational drug within the last 30 days

- Subject cannot communicate reliably with the Investigator or is deemed uncooperative or noncompliant

- Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or refuse to use a reliable method of birth control

- Subject received treatment with a preparation containing MPL during the past 12 months

- Use of prohibited medications or inadequate washout periods prior to screening

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Pharmacodynamics Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Single Blind, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Biological:
Tree MATA MPL


Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Allied Research International Inc. Mississauga Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Allergy Therapeutics

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary to assess the allergenicity of the modified tree (birch, alder, hazel) pollen allergoid using skin prick testing
Secondary evaluation for potential late phase reactions; adverse events; clinical labs; vital signs
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00133146 - Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Grass Pollen Allergy Vaccine Phase 2
Completed NCT00133159 - Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Grass Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Grass Pollen Phase 2
Terminated NCT00387478 - Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Tree MATAMPL,Tree MATA, and Placebo in Patients With Birch-Induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Phase 2
Completed NCT00414141 - Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Grass MATA MPL Phase 3
Completed NCT00258635 - Investigation of Safety+Efficacy of Different Doses of RagweedMATAMPL;Assessment of Residual Allergenicity Using Skin Prick Test Phase 2
Completed NCT00325338 - Follow-up Investigation of Efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL,and Placebo in Patients With Ragweed-induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT00109759 - Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Tyrosine Adsorbed Ragweed Pollen Allergoid With MPL (Monophosphoryl Lipid A) Phase 1
Completed NCT00110786 - Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Ragweed MATAMPL, Pollinex-R and Placebo in Patients With Ragweed Allergy Phase 2
Completed NCT00423787 - Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Ragweed MATA MPL Phase 3
Completed NCT00104377 - Induction of Immunogenicity With Different Doses of Grass MATA in Subjects Allergic to Grass and Rye Pollen Phase 2
Completed NCT00104390 - Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Grass/Rye Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing Phase 1
Completed NCT00116285 - Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Ragweed Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) Using Skin Prick Testing Phase 1
Completed NCT00118612 - Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Tree Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Tree Pollen Phase 2
Completed NCT00113750 - Induction of Immunogenicity With Different Doses of TreeMATA in Subjects Allergic to Tree Pollen Phase 2
Completed NCT00118625 - Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Tree Pollen Allergy Vaccine Phase 2
Completed NCT00241410 - Safety, Immunological Effect and Efficacy of the Combined Application of MPL and Grass Pollen Allergen Phase 1