Tree Nut Allergy Clinical Trial
— WOITOfficial title:
Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy
Verified date | April 2023 |
Source | University of Arkansas |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in participants allergic to tree nuts to reduce tree nut allergy and induce changes in the participant's immune system.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 22 |
Est. completion date | July 2, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2, 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 6 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (= 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE > 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut. - A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut. - Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian - Written assent from all subjects as appropriate - All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control Exclusion Criteria: - History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 < 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence). - Known allergy to oat - Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge. - Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis - Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years. - Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months - Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing). - Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma - Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC - Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year - Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers - Pregnancy or lactation |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Arkansas Children's Hospital | Little Rock | Arkansas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Arkansas |
United States,
Hofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):286-91, 291.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.045. Epub 2009 May 27. — View Citation
Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kulis M, Shreffler WG, Steele P, Henry KA, Adair M, Francis JM, Durham S, Vickery BP, Zhong X, Burks AW. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):292-300, 300.e1-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jul 3. — View Citation
Kulis M, Li Y, Lane H, Pons L, Burks W. Single-tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18. — View Citation
Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1111. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Effectiveness of Walnut OIT on Clinical Desensitization to Test Tree Nut as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 at Oral Food Challenge | Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut ("test tree nut") causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the test tree nut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy. | 38 weeks of therapy | |
Secondary | Evaluation of Desensitization to Walnut Protein as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 Oral Food Challenge | Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to walnut causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the walnut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy. | 38 weeks | |
Secondary | Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Walnut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38 | The percentage of subjects reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the desensitization oral food challenge to walnut at week 38 | 38 weeks | |
Secondary | Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Test Tree Nut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38 | Comparison of the number and percentage of subjects in each treatment arm reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the week 38 (desensitization) oral food challenge to test tree nut | 38 weeks | |
Secondary | Number (Percentage) of Subjects Attaining Sustained Unresponsiveness to Walnut and Test Tree Nut Proteins at Week 298 Oral Food Challenge | The percentage of subjects demonstrating sustained unresponsiveness to walnut and to the test tree nut by end of study.
Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants during open-label extension arm through the end of study at week 298. Subjects were able to exit the study at assessment timepoints earlier than week 298 if they are able to pass the sustained unresponsiveness oral food challenge, thus the analysis included all subjects through week 298.. |
up to 298 weeks on active treatment | |
Secondary | Change in Skin Prick Test Wheal Size From Baseline to Week 142 in Active and Placebo Cross-over Subjects Receiving Active Walnut OIT | Evaluation of walnut OIT on the mast cell responses as measured through change in skin prick testing to walnut in participants who were treated with walnut OIT to week 142. Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants from baseline through open-label treatment phase until the end of study. | 142 weeks | |
Secondary | Serious Adverse Events Related to Walnut OIT Treatment | Incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events during the study | 298 weeks active treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05521711 -
TRADE Trial - Tree Nut Immunotherapy Route Development and Evaluation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06038019 -
Thresholds In Food Allergy evaluaTion And predictioN
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04151069 -
Re-Introducing Nuts in Allergic Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT02961452 -
Phenotypical Characterization of Peanut Allergic Children
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03532360 -
Peanut and Tree Nut Desensitization
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05662800 -
Development of Peanut, Sesame, and Tree Nut Allergy in Polish Children at High Risk of Food Allergy
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03680066 -
Study to Assess Tolerance of Traces in Peanut/Tree Nut Allergic Children.
|
N/A |