Traumatic Amputation of Arm Clinical Trial
Official title:
Interface Kinematics of Transhumeral Prosthetic Sockets Using XROMM
Verified date | November 2014 |
Source | VA Office of Research and Development |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Federal Government |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this pilot study was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of two designs for transhumeral level upper limb prosthetic sockets: a traditional socket design and a socket design hypothesized to provide greater skeletal stabilization. The investigators comparisons included assessments of patient comfort and satisfaction with fit, as well as dynamic kinematic assessment using X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) a novel high-speed, high-resolution, bi-plane video radiography system.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 2 |
Est. completion date | September 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male and female transhumeral amputees, 18 years or older of any ethnicity, who are current prosthetic users. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects with frozen shoulder of the residual side, and/or severely limited active range of motion of the shoulder joint of the residual limb - Inability to tolerate wearing of a prosthetic socket - Mental impairment that renders a subject unable to comply with the study - Skin conditions such as burns or poor skin coverage as well as those with severe contractures that prevent prior prosthetic wear - Any electrically controlled medical device including pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or drug pumps - Neuropathy, uncontrolled diabetes, receiving dialysis - Any other significant comorbidity which would interfere with the study - Severe circulatory problems including peripheral vascular disease and pitting edema will be excluded - Cognitive deficits or mental health problems that would limit ability to participate fully in the study protocol - Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant in the near future |
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Manhattan Campus of the VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY | New York | New York |
United States | Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI | Providence | Rhode Island |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
VA Office of Research and Development | Brown University, Lifespan |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Degrees of Shoulder Abduction Within the Prosthetic Socket | Shoulder abduction was performed to the subject's maximum elevation. Skeletal and socket kinematics were calculated using the markerless auto-registration algorithm and X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) | After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style) | No |
Primary | Degrees of Shoulder Internal Rotation Within the Prosthetic Socket | Isometric internal rotation was performed with the prosthetic elbow flexed to 90 degrees and shoulder in neutral position. Skeletal and socket kinematics were calculated using the markerless auto-registration algorithm and X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) | After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style) | No |
Primary | Degrees of Shoulder Displacement Within the Prosthetic Socket | A shoulder shrug task was achieved by pulling up on a strap attached to the load cell, which was mounted on the vertical face of the concrete pedestal. Skeletal and socket kinematics were calculated using the markerless auto-registration algorithm and X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) | After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style) | No |
Secondary | Trinity Amputations and Prosthetics Experience Satisfaction Scale (TAPES) | This 10 item scale includes items related to satisfaction with aspects of the prosthesis. It includes questions about extent of satisfaction regarding functional characteristics of the artificial limb: reliability, comfort, fit, and overall satisfaction, contentment with cosmetic characteristics of the device. Each item is rated on a 5 point scale from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Scores are summed and the average of the 10 items are calculated. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Scores range from 1-5. | After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style) | No |
Secondary | Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) - Utility Subscale | The 8-item utility subscale includes items related to prosthetic socket utility including: comfort, fit, ease of donning and doffing and feel on the residual limb. All items were scored using a 1 to 7 Likert scale average with lower scores indicated worse ratings and higher scores indicated better ratings. The scores for each item were added and the total score was the average of scores for all items, thus scores could range from 1 to 7. | after 2 weeks of home use of each socket type | No |
Secondary | Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) - Residual Limb Health Subscale | The 6-item residual limb health scale includes items about the bothersome of sweating, smell, swelling, ingrown hairs, rashes and blisters. All items were scored using a 1 to 7 Likert scale average with lower scores indicated worse ratings and higher scores indicated better ratings. The scores for each item were added and the total score was the average of scores for all items, thus scores could range from 1 to 7. | After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style) | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02165865 -
Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation of the Hand and Upper Extremity (Hand Transplant)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01551420 -
Home Study of an Advanced Upper Limb Prosthesis
|
N/A |