Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03740997
Other study ID # GE-191-008
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date December 1, 2020
Est. completion date March 30, 2023

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source GE Healthcare
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Study to determine the safety and appropriate dosage of OPTISON in pediatric participants since OPTISON has been tested in adult participants only during the clinical development


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 39
Est. completion date March 30, 2023
Est. primary completion date March 30, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 9 Years to 17 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - The participant was between =9 and <18 years of age and weighs =20 kg. - The participant was clinically indicated to undergo a transthoracic echocardiogram. - The participant had a suboptimal non-contrast echocardiogram defined as =2 contiguous segments in any given view that cannot be visualized. - The participant was able to comply with study procedures. - A parent or legal guardian of the participant had signed and dated an informed consent form. - Post-menarchal female participants must have had a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at pre-dose on the day of OPTISON administration. - Post-menarchal female participants must have been practicing abstinence, or be using an effective form of birth control (e.g., intrauterine device, oral contraceptives, contraceptive implants or injections, diaphragm with spermicide, cervical cap, or consort use of condom) for at least 30 days before being enrolled in the study Exclusion Criteria: - The participant was previously enrolled in this study. - The participant received an investigational medicinal product within 30 days before or is scheduled to receive one from time of entry into this study until completion of the follow-up period proposed for this study. - The participant had a known or suspected hypersensitivity to any of the components of OPTISON, blood, blood products, or albumin. - The participant had pulmonary hypertension or unstable cardiopulmonary conditions. - The participant had severe liver disease based on medical history. - The participant had a recent (<6 months) neurological event. - The participant presented any clinically active, serious, life-threatening disease, with a life expectancy of less than 1 month or where study participation may compromise the management of the participant or other reason that in the judgment of the investigator makes the participant unsuitable for participation in the study. - The participant was a pregnant or lactating female, or was a female of childbearing potential not using an acceptable form of birth control (negative urine pregnancy test was also required).

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Optison
Optison is administered intravenously

Locations

Country Name City State
United States MCG Health, Inc. Augusta Georgia
United States Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland
United States Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Chicago Illinois
United States Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio
United States Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas
United States Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York Lake Success New York
United States Children's Hospital Los Angeles Los Angeles California
United States Phoenix Children's Hospital Phoenix Arizona

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
GE Healthcare Laboratory Corporation of America

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Total Visualization Score of Qualitative Endocardial Border Delineation (EBD) of the 12 Segments of the Left Ventricle (LV) Wall in Standard Apical 4-chamber (A4C) and Apical 2-chamber (A2C) Visualization of each of the 12 segments of the LV wall in standard A4C and A2C views were measured by the qualitative EBD visualization scale: score 0 =no visualization of the LV endocardial border; 1 =poor visualization; 2 =fair visualization; 3 =good/optimal visualization. The total LV EBD score was calculated as the sum of the individual scores assigned to each of the 12 LV wall segment and the total score ranged from 0 (no visualization of the LV endocardial border) to 36 (good/optimal visualization). A higher score indicated better visualization. The total score of qualitative EBD visualization scale were reported by reader (independent blinded), non-contrast and dose levels. Images were captured during the study echocardiogram (0 to 30 minutes) on Day 1 and blinded image evaluations (BIE) were carried out at the study core laboratory following image transfer
Secondary Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) An Adverse Event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily had to have causal relationship with treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that starts or worsens at or after the time of first dosing of OPTISON. 0- 72 hours
Secondary Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured from the arm contra-lateral to the site of OPTISON administration whenever possible and before measurement, participants rested for at least 5 minutes (if possible). Baseline (pre-dose), and at 10 and 60 minutes post last dose on Day 1
Secondary Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Before heart rate was measured, participants rested for at least 5 minutes (if possible). Baseline (pre-dose), and at 10 and 60 minutes post last dose on Day 1
Secondary Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate Before respiratory rate was measured, participants rested for at least 5 minutes (if possible). Baseline (pre-dose), and at 10 and 60 minutes post last dose on Day 1
Secondary Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation as Measured by Pulse Oximetry Oxygen saturation was measured by pulse oximetry. Before oxygen saturation was measured, participants rested for at least 5 minutes (if possible). Baseline (pre-dose), and at 10 and 60 minutes post last dose on Day 1
Secondary Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Physical Examination Findings Participants underwent assessments including general appearance, respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological (motor function, level of consciousness, sensory function) examination. Any abnormal clinically significant physical examination findings were based on investigator decision. From first dose (Day 1) of study drug to 60 minutes post last dose on Day 1
Secondary Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Parameters Change from baseline in PR, QRS, QT, Bazett's formula corrected QT (QTcB), Fridericia's formula corrected QT (QTcF) and RR intervals expressed in millisecond (ms) were reported. Baseline (pre-dose), and at 10 and 30 minutes post last dose on Day 1
Secondary Number of Participants by Degree of Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO) Assessed by Visual Peak Contrast Intensity LVO peak contrast intensity was determined by readers (independent blinded) using a categorical scale as None, Low, Medium, High or Blooming, where, None = Absence of contrast signal; Low = Limited capacity to make a diagnostic assessment; Presence of contrast signal does not improve diagnostic interpretability to a great degree; Medium = Good capacity to make a diagnostic assessment; Contrast signal facilitates diagnostic interpretability to a good degree; High = Optimal capacity to make a diagnostic assessment; Contrast signal facilitates diagnostic interpretability to a high degree; Blooming = Oversaturation of the signal disrupts diagnostic interpretability. Tissue boundaries become challenging to delineate. There may be excessive acoustic shadowing in the far-field of the image. Number of participants by degree of LVO assessed by visual peak contrast intensity was presented by readers and dose levels. Images were captured during the study echocardiogram (0 to 30 minutes) on Day 1 and blinded image evaluations (BIE) were carried out at the study core laboratory following image transfer
Secondary Number of Participants by Grade of Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO) Assessed by Peak Left Ventricular (LV) Contrast Filling Peak LV contrast filling for LVO was categorized as: 0 = none (0 percent [%] filling); 1 = faint (around 33% filling); 2 = intermediate (around 67% filling); 3 = full (100% filling) and data were presented by readers (independent blinded) and dose levels. Images were captured during the study echocardiogram (0 to 30 minutes) on Day 1 and blinded image evaluations (BIE) were carried out at the study core laboratory following image transfer
Secondary Number of Participants by Contrast Enhancement Duration in the Left Ventricular (LV) Chamber Contrast enhancement duration was determined from the time the contrast appeared in the LV to the time the contrast almost dissipated from the left chamber. 3 independent blinded reader performed evaluation. Images were captured during the study echocardiogram (0 to 30 minutes) on Day 1 and blinded image evaluations (BIE) were carried out at the study core laboratory following image transfer
Secondary Number of Participants by Diagnostic Confidence of Left Ventricular Endocardial Border Delineation (LV EBD) and Wall Motion for Contrast and Non-Contrast Enhanced Images Diagnostic confidence for the assessment of LV EBD and wall motion was scored for non-contrast and OPTISON-enhanced echocardiographic acquisitions separately using a 4-point scale which ranged from ranged 0 to 4, where 0 = no confidence, 1 = low confidence, 2 = moderate confidence, 3 = high confidence. A higher score indicates better confidence level. Data were presented by reader (independent blinded), non-contrast and dose levels. Images were captured during the study echocardiogram (0 to 30 minutes) on Day 1 and blinded image evaluations (BIE) were carried out at the study core laboratory following image transfer
Secondary Number of Participants by Diagnostic Confidence of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) for Non-contrast and OPTISON Enhanced Echocardiography Diagnostic confidence for the evaluation of LVEF was calculated using the formula: (end diastole volume - end systole volume)/(end diastole volume) was scored for non-contrast and OPTISON-enhanced echocardiographic acquisitions separately using a 4-point scale which ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = no confidence, 1 = low confidence, 2 = moderate confidence, 3 = high confidence. A higher score indicates better confidence level. Data were presented by reader (independent blinded), non-contrast and dose levels. Images were captured during the study echocardiogram (0 to 30 minutes) on Day 1 and blinded image evaluations (BIE) were carried out at the study core laboratory following image transfer
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04083924 - Preclinical Medical Student Echocardiography Training American Society of Echocardiography Curriculum N/A
Completed NCT03938220 - Electrical Cardiometry Compared to Transthoracic Echocardiography in Fluid Responsiveness in Sepsis
Recruiting NCT04490538 - Evaluation of Right Ventricular Systolic Function by TAPSE Parameter From Subcostal View
Recruiting NCT04488627 - Reliability of Ultrasound Examination of the Inferior Caval Vein
Completed NCT04524468 - Right Ventricular Function in End-stage Renal Disease Patients
Completed NCT04521933 - Reliability of Subjective Assessment of the Heart by Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound
Recruiting NCT04494152 - Reliability of Echocardiography From Subcostal View
Recruiting NCT05414110 - Effect of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Right Ventricular Function Assessed by Transthoracic Echocardiography
Completed NCT06075407 - Evaluation of Fluid Resuscitation in Shocked Patients by Electrical Cardiometry in Comparison to Transthoracic Echocardiography.