Transfemoral Amputation Clinical Trial
Official title:
Microprocessor Knee Versus Mechanical Knee: Impact on Functional Outcomes in Dysvascular Transfemoral Amputees
In older adults, poor circulation in the lower extremities leads to serious health complications including limb loss. In addition, individuals with dysvascular disease also suffer from other co-morbidities like diabetes, coronary and cerebrovascular disease. An individual with a transfemoral (TF) amputation is usually fitted with a prosthetic limb to assist with function, including a prosthetic knee and a prosthetic foot. Currently, dysvascular amputees are given a prosthetic knee based on the basic expectation that they will be functionally stable. This consideration does not address higher levels of function like walking at multiple speeds and over uneven ground. Also, dysvascular amputees are not able to counteract their co-morbidities with a more active lifestyle. Walking is less energy efficient; their traditional prostheses may cause early onset of fatigue and induce a fear of falling. Newer microprocessor knees enable patients with transfemoral amputations to walk on different surfaces and at multiple cadences through better control in swing and stance phases of gait. The impact of the functional differences in the prostheses is not clear and requires additional investigation to clarify the choice of the most appropriate functional prosthesis. The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes with the traditional mechanical knee versus the microprocessor knee (C-leg) in transfemoral amputees.
In older adults, poor circulation in the lower extremities or dysvascular disease can lead to
serious health complications. In addition, these individuals also suffer from serious
co-morbidities like diabetes and coronary or cerebrovascular disease. Circulatory dysfunction
or dysvascular disease is the major cause for amputations in the United States
(www.amputee-coalition.orf/fact_sheet/amp_stats_cause.html). Increasing sedentary lifestyles
have lead to increased rates of diabetes which has significantly contributed to an increased
number of amputations in recent years. The risk of amputation in a diabetic individual is 25
times higher than in the non-diabetic population. The level of amputation that is appropriate
for an individual depends on the extent of damage to his/her tissues. Common amputations of
the lower extremities in the dysvascular population include the transtibial and transfemoral
amputations. The individual having a transtibial or below knee amputation, will be fitted
with a prosthetic foot to assist with functional ambulation, while a person with a
transfemoral amputation will require both a prosthetic foot and knee for ambulatory purposes.
Currently dysvascular amputees are given prostheses based on the goal of returning them to a
basic level of function focused primarily on stability. They are considered lower functioning
walkers and are expected to use a slow and constant walking speed to ambulate around their
homes and are not considered traditional community ambulators. Therefore, they are
traditionally given standard mechanical knees which are considered safe, as they provide the
ability for only simple single speed house-hold tasks. While this criterion does return the
patient to function for basic Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and walking at a single
cadence, it does not empower the patient to counteract the previously existing
co-morbidities. Dysvascular amputees tend to be less active predisposing them to a more
sedentary lifestyle and exacerbating their risk factors. Their prostheses make them energy
inefficient and use more energy for ADLs and functional walking. This causes early onset of
fatigue, induces anxiety and fear of falling. Further, they are often depressed, lose
motivation and curtail their community interaction. This raises the question if dysvascular
amputees are further functionally limited by the prostheses traditionally given to them.
More recently, technology has been used to assist with return to function in the amputee
population. Microprocessor (MP) controlled knees are among the technological innovations
applied to prostheses to not only return amputees to a basic function, but also with a view
to return them to their highest possible function. Over the years, clinical use has shown
that traditional knees provide the ability to complete ADLs and basic functions like sit -
stand. However, activities like negotiating stairs/steps, walking on uneven ground and
self-correction during tripping; functions which reintegrate amputees into unlimited
community ambulation and social reintegration require prosthetics which advanced
functionality. The Otto Bock C-leg is a MP knee that allows the patient a greater level of
control in swing and stance phases of gait. This enables the TF amputee to adjust the
requirements of gait during dynamic walking like changing the speed of walking, going up and
down stairs and inclines, walking on grass and uneven surfaces and crossing an obstacle. The
C-leg has been traditionally given to patients who begin post-amputation rehabilitation at a
higher level, but are more expensive than traditionally mechanical knees. In the contrary
however, a European study that defined health outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life year
(QALY), indicated that the C-leg showed a QALY gain of €3218 per patient, makes it still
financial viable keeping it mind its price tag.. The purpose of this study is to compare the
traditional mechanical knee to the microprocessor knee (C-leg) in the dysvascular population.
The study will specifically evaluate the potential of microprocessor knees to improve the
quality of life in dysvascular transfemoral amputees. This includes identifying if the C-leg
can increase the activity level to be classified at a higher level by the Medicare
classification from K2 (lower level ambulators) to K3 (more proficient ambulators), along
with increasing their social interaction in the community.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06399471 -
Personalizing MPK Prescription
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02564432 -
Microbiome and Metagenome in Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prostheses (MMPOP)
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02891707 -
Mobile Device Outcomes-based Rehabilitation Program
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01725711 -
Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05662982 -
Sub-Ischial Socket for Transfemoral Amputation and Lower Mobility
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05925712 -
Aerofit Post Market Investigation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03296904 -
The CYBERnetic LowEr-Limb CoGnitive Ortho-prosthesis Plus Plus, 1st Clinical Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02219230 -
Use of Passive, Adaptive, and Active Prosthetic Knees in Persons With Unilateral, Transfemoral Amputation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04023045 -
Assist-Knee: Energy-Harvesting Knee Prosthesis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06045468 -
Early Rehabilitation After Transfemoral Amputation in Moderately Active Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05989243 -
Improving Socket Fit in Female and Male Veterans With Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05695911 -
Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prosthesis Limb-Load Symmetry Training
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05831696 -
Metabolic Cost of Walking With Passive vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees Among Persons With Limb Loss
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06218238 -
A Biomechanical Evaluation of the Ossur Power Knee in Persons With Transfemoral Amputation
|
N/A |