Total Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Psychometric Analysis of the Arabic Version of Oxford Knee Score Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Middle East Population and an Exploration of Outcomes Post-total Knee Arthroplasty in the Middle East
Verified date | May 2020 |
Source | University of Salford |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The intention is to explore whether there are factors, which can help us to understand why
some patient outcomes, following total knee arthroplasty are not successful and identify
prediction factors for progression. Assessment of outcomes pre- and post-surgery with
objective tools is a way to explore prediction tools for good/poor progression and improve
patient selection and timing for surgery.
The first aim of this project is determine the psychometric properties of the Arabic Version
of Oxford Knee Score, including internal consistency, reliability and validity before and
post-total knee arthroplasty in both males and females in a Middle East population. The
second aim is to assess the reliability of the Star Excursion Balance Test for measuring the
dynamic balance. The final aim is explore outcomes post-total knee arthroplasty among Middle
East patients using the Arabic Version of Oxford Knee Score, physical activity measures and
performance-based measurements such as: 30 s chair-stand test, stair-climb test, timed
up-and-go test and a 6 m walk test while adhering to Osteoarthritis Research Society
International recommendations.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 116 |
Est. completion date | February 18, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 30, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 19 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: All patients will be asked to participate during preadmission orthopedics clinic visits to King Khalid University Hospital in Riyadh if the patient; - Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. - For end-stage knee osteoarthritis. - In a stable and controlled medical condition, Exclusion Criteria: - Are scheduled for bilateral knee arthroplasty or unilateral knee revision surgery; - Cannot read and understand Arabic - Have limited function due to musculoskeletal conditions other than unilateral knee osteoarthritis. - Have been diagnosed with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or blood pressure. - Have been diagnosed with any neurologic disorders, such as stroke, Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis. - Are morbidly obese and have a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40. - Have advance osteoporosis or some other unstable chronic disease. - Have been diagnosed with a peripheral vascular or uncontrolled cardiac disease. - Participant will further be excluded post-surgery if they develop any surgical complications, such as deep vein thrombosis, uncontrolled infection or fracture. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | King Khalid University Hospital | Riyadh |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Salford | King Khalid University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University |
Saudi Arabia,
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. Erratum in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 May 15;193(10):1185. — View Citation
Bade MJ, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Outcomes before and after total knee arthroplasty compared to healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Sep;40(9):559-67. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3317. — View Citation
Bade MJ, Wolfe P, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Snyder-Mackler L. Predicting poor physical performance after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2012 Nov;30(11):1805-10. doi: 10.1002/jor.22140. Epub 2012 Apr 26. — View Citation
Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Sep;16(6):740-7. — View Citation
Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Review. — View Citation
Charoencholvanich K, Pongcharoen B. Oxford knee score and SF-36: translation & reliability for use with total knee arthroscopy patients in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Sep;88(9):1194-202. — View Citation
Coughlan GF, Fullam K, Delahunt E, Gissane C, Caulfield BM. A comparison between performance on selected directions of the star excursion balance test and the Y balance test. J Athl Train. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):366-71. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.03. — View Citation
Dahlgren G, Carlsson D, Moorhead A, Häger-Ross C, McDonough SM. Test-retest reliability of step counts with the ActivPAL™ device in common daily activities. Gait Posture. 2010 Jul;32(3):386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Jul 22. — View Citation
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, Abbott JH, Stratford P, Davis AM, Buchbinder R, Snyder-Mackler L, Henrotin Y, Thumboo J, Hansen P, Bennell KL. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 13. — View Citation
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: SAGE Publications Ltd,.
Fullam K, Caulfield B, Coughlan GF, Delahunt E. Kinematic analysis of selected reach directions of the Star Excursion Balance Test compared with the Y-Balance Test. J Sport Rehabil. 2014 Feb;23(1):27-35. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2012-0114. Epub 2013 Aug 12. — View Citation
Gill S, McBurney H. Reliability of performance-based measures in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee. Physiother Res Int. 2008 Sep;13(3):141-52. doi: 10.1002/pri.411. — View Citation
Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. J Athl Train. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):339-57. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.08. Review. — View Citation
Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Field RE, Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Price AJ, Beard DJ. Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Knee Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2561-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0393-x. Epub 2013 Mar 23. — View Citation
Hertel J, Braham RA, Hale SA, Olmsted-Kramer LC. Simplifying the star excursion balance test: analyses of subjects with and without chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;36(3):131-7. — View Citation
Hossain FS, Konan S, Patel S, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Haddad FS. The assessment of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: are we there yet? Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):3-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34434. Review. — View Citation
Hossain FS, Patel S, Fernandez MA, Konan S, Haddad FS. A performance based patient outcome score for active patients following total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Jan;21(1):51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.019. Epub 2012 Oct 9. — View Citation
Hyong IH, Kim JH. Test of intrarater and interrater reliability for the star excursion balance test. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1139-41. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1139. Epub 2014 Aug 30. — View Citation
Impellizzeri FM, Mannion AF, Leunig M, Bizzini M, Naal FD. Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.027. Epub 2010 Nov 12. — View Citation
Jagger, C., Matthews, R., Spiers, N., Brayne, C., Comas - Herrera, A., Robinson, T., . . . Croft, P. (2006). Compression or expansion of disability?: forecasting future disability levels under changing patterns of diseases: King's Fund.
Jenny JY, Diesinger Y. Validation of a French version of the Oxford knee questionnaire. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 May;97(3):267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.07.009. Epub 2011 Jan 12. — View Citation
Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD, Penney D. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005 Jan 28;6:3. — View Citation
Klit J, Jacobsen S, Rosenlund S, Sonne-Holm S, Troelsen A. Total knee arthroplasty in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):912-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Oct 1. — View Citation
Ko V, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Crosbie J, Yeo AE. The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 24;14:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-145. — View Citation
Lungu E, Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile EL, Vendittoli PA. Prediction of poor outcomes six months following total knee arthroplasty in patients awaiting surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Sep 8;15:299. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-299. — View Citation
Lützner C, Kirschner S, Lützner J. Patient activity after TKA depends on patient-specific parameters. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3933-40. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3813-5. Epub 2014 Jul 23. — View Citation
McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 22. Review. — View Citation
Meiring RM, Frimpong E, Mokete L, Pietrzak J, Van Der Jagt D, Tikly M, McVeigh JA. Rationale, design and protocol of a longitudinal study assessing the effect of total knee arthroplasty on habitual physical activity and sedentary behavior in adults with osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 13;17:281. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1141-5. — View Citation
Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Clements KE, Zeni JA Jr, Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments: a longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Aug;26(5):728-37. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Sep 20. — View Citation
Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Sieverding M, Loibl M, von Knoch F, Mannion AF, Leunig M, Munzinger U. The 12-item Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation into German and assessment of its psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jan;17(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Jul 7. — View Citation
Palmer CR. Encyclopedia of biostatistics . BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):542. — View Citation
Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota RE, Toms AD. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset. Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1076-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35170. — View Citation
Plichta, S., & Kelvin, E. (2012). Munro's Statistical Methods for Health Care Research: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. — View Citation
Robinson RH, Gribble PA. Support for a reduction in the number of trials needed for the star excursion balance test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Feb;89(2):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.139. — View Citation
Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, Akizuki KH, Frankel RE, Belcher G, Amstutz HC. Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Jan;80(1):54-9. — View Citation
Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;59(2):160-7. Epub 2005 Dec 27. — View Citation
Thumboo J, Chew LH, Lewin-Koh SC. Socioeconomic and psychosocial factors influence pain or physical function in Asian patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Nov;61(11):1017-20. — View Citation
Unver B, Kalkan S, Yuksel E, Kahraman T, Karatosun V. Reliability of the 50-foot walk test and 30-sec chair stand test in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):184-7. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522015230401018. — View Citation
* Note: There are 39 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Performance based measurements change in Thirty second chair-stand test | A chair of 17 inches (45cm) height is used as the starting position for patients sitting with their arms cross the chest. Patients are instructed to stand and then sit with good buttock placement and back support, their hands on arm rests and feet correctly placed, then stand again as fast and safely as they can. The assessor counts the number of complete chair stands within 30 s. The mean of two trials will be used for analysis (Gill & McBurney, 2008; Unver, Kalkan, Yuksel, Kahraman, & Karatosun, 2015) | one week before admission day and 6 months after surgery to assess the performance changes post-surgery | |
Primary | Performance based measurements change in Stair-climb test | Using a stopwatch accurate to 1/100 s, an assessor will measure the time required for a patient, using a handrail if required, to ascend and descend a flight of twelve steps 18 cm high and 28 cm deep. Patients will be instructed to ascend and descend the stairs as quickly, safely and comfortably as they can. The mean of two trials will be used for analysis (Mizner et al., 2011) | one week before admission day and 6 months after surgery to assess the performance changes post-surgery | |
Primary | Performance based measurements change in Timed up-and-go test | The test procedure will use a stopwatch accurate to 1/100 s; a chair of standard 45 cm height, with armrests, will be placed on an outdoor level footpath and a line 3 metres from the chair will be drawn. Patients will be instructed to stand up from the chair, using the arms if required, walk for 3 metres to the line, then turn round and walk to sit back down on the chair as quickly, safely and comfortably as they can. An assessor will start timing as the patient leans forward to stand up, and stop when the patient's hips make contact with the seat to sit down. An average of two repetitions will be analysed (Ko, Naylor, Harris, Crosbie, & Yeo, 2013; Mizner et al., 2011; Podsiadlo & Richardson, 1991). | one week before admission day and 6 months after surgery to assess the performance changes post-surgery | |
Primary | Performance based measurements change in Six minute walk test | The test will measure how far patients can walk in 6 minutes along a level 25-metre footpath. Patients can use an assistive device if required, take a rest if necessary and have standardized encouragement after each minute. The assessor will ask the patient to stop after 6 minutes. Only one test will be performed to avoid fatigue ("ATS Statement," 2002; Ko et al., 2013; Mizner et al., 2011). | one week before admission day and 6 months after surgery to assess the performance changes post-surgery | |
Primary | Balance change | In the Star Excursion Balance Test, three tape measures will be fixed to the clinic floor, one oriented anteriorly to the apex and two aligned at 135° to the anterior tape in the posterolateral and posteromedial directions. (Fullam, Caulfield, Coughlan, & Delahunt, 2014). The patient will stand in the center of the grid and be instructed to stand on the affected or operated leg while reaching out as far as possible in one of the three directions with the other lower extremity, and then return that leg to the center. The participant will be asked to perform the test barefoot, keeping the heel of the stance leg on the floor at all times and to bend the knee of the stance leg. If the participant does not carry out any of these instructions, the trial will repeated. The assessor will measure the reach distance in each direction in centimeters and then normalize the average of the three trials to leg length. |
one week before admission day and 6 months after surgery to assess the balance changes post-surgery | |
Primary | Physical activity measurements change will be assess using an activPAL activity monitor (PAL Technologies, Glasgow, UK) | an activPAL activity monitor (PAL Technologies, Glasgow, UK) as this proven accelerometer provides objective quantification of free-living physical activity without any modification (Dahlgren, Carlsson, Moorhead, Hager-Ross, & McDonough, 2010; Schmalzried et al., 1998). It is suitable as it light in weight (20g), includes an inclinometer and is small in size (53 x 35 x 7 mm) Figure 3. The device is worn by patient's mid-thigh, secured by non-allergic waterproof adhesive tape under their clothes, for 7-10 days before surgery and 6 months after. Clear written and verbal instructions will be given to patients as they have to wear it all day and all night except, when bathing or swimming (they can take a shower with it on). | one week before admission day and 6 months after surgery to assess the physical activity changes post-surgery | |
Secondary | Arabic versions of Oxford Knee Score Validity assessment | The patients will be instructed to complete the Arabic versions of Oxford Knee Score, Arabic versions of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) before Arthroplasty as baseline data in order to assess the correlation of Arabic versions of Oxford Knee Score with the Arabic version of KOOS and VAS to determine construct validity (Arabic versions of Oxford Knee Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and visual analogue scale | one week before admission day | |
Secondary | Arabic versions of Oxford Knee Score Reliability assessment | Patients will be asked to fill out Arabic forms independently without any interpretation to assess the Score reliability and responsiveness. | one week before admission day, admission day and 6 months after surgery and to evaluate the construct validity of the Arabic version of Oxford Knee Score |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03542981 -
Interferential Current Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04458480 -
Effect of Fast Inpatient Rehabilitation After TKA
|
||
Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06061367 -
Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05391828 -
Persona MC vs PS RCT With ROSA
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04850300 -
Efficiency Assessment of the Methodology for the Follow-up of Patients With Knee Prostheses
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05635916 -
Trial of Liposomal Bupivacaine for TKA
|
Phase 4 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05130216 -
Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
||
Completed |
NCT03206554 -
Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02495805 -
Ultrasound-guided Continuous Proximal Adductor Canal vs Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control and Rehabilitation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01616836 -
Optimizing Pain and Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01511211 -
Duration of Leg Nerve Blocks With Dexamethasone Added to Local Anesthetic
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00958945 -
Retrospective Chart Analysis in the Effective Use of FloSeal in Post-Operative Joint Replacements
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00985920 -
Topical Tranexamic Acid for Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00761956 -
A Study to Compare the NexGen CR and CR-Flex Knee Implants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03289247 -
Tissue Adhaesive in Wound Closure Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03316118 -
US Guided GNB vs Saline Injection for TKA
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05962970 -
Continuous Adductor Canal Block in Fast Track Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03317834 -
Navio With Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06188091 -
Joint Movement to Increase Range of Motion in Knee Joint After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A |