Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study investigates single injection adductor canal block (ACB) with or without intravenous dexamethasone and adductor canal catheter for pain management of total knee arthroplasty. This is a non-inferiority trial seeking to determine whether single injection ACB with dexamethasone is "no worse" than a continuous catheter.


Clinical Trial Description

1. Purpose

To determine whether single shot adductor canal nerve blocks with intravenous dexamethasone are non-inferior to continuous adductor canal blockade.

2. Hypotheses

The use of adductor canal nerve block with intravenous dexamethasone will not be inferior to continuous adductor canal blockade for opioid requirements 24h post operatively.

The single injection adductor canal block without dexamethasone will have the most opioid consumption. The dexamethasone and catheter groups will be superior to single injection alone in terms of 12 and 48h opioid consumption, length of stay, anti-emetic usage, pain score and quality of recovery score.

3. Justification

Total knee arthroplasty is a very commonly performed operation in North America, with a high propensity for postoperative pain. Inadequate analgesia limits functional recovery and leads to delays in hospital discharge, as a result of poor mobility. Effective analgesia allows for earlier mobilization and improved postoperative recovery, with a multi-modal regime being the ideal method to achieve this.

Currently a multi-modal regime is provided to patients: intraoperatively with a neuraxial technique (spinal anesthesia), along with surgeon infiltrated local anesthetic at the end of the operation, and then postoperatively using systemic opioids via patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Opioids have many side effects, including nausea and vomiting, sedation, respiratory depression and urinary retention. These all lead to delay in ambulation and recovery.

Many centers now incorporate peripheral nerve blocks as part of the multi-modal analgesic regime, with continuous femoral nerve blockade being commonly used for analgesia. This does decrease the amount of postoperative opioid used, but has the downside of causing quadriceps muscle weakness leading to an increased risk of falls and delayed ambulation. For this reason, there has been an increase in the use of the adductor canal block, a nerve block of the distal femoral nerve at the mid-thigh level, that has been shown to preserve quadriceps function better than a femoral nerve block, whilst still ensuring decreased opioid use. To date, no studies have compared single shot adductor canal block with continuous adductor canal blockade, but both have been shown to be comparable to femoral nerve blockade, whilst decreasing the likelihood of quadriceps muscle weakness.

Further to this, it has been shown that the addition of dexamethasone, administered via the intravenous or perineural route to peripheral nerve blockade, prolongs the duration of analgesia. Perineural administration of dexamethasone is an off label use and there is also a theoretical risk of neurotoxicity from dexamethasone itself. Findings to date indicate that the efficacy of dexamethasone administered intravenously is non-inferior to perineural injection. Both routes prolong the analgesic benefit of peripheral nerve blocks with similar reductions in opioid requirements.

Opioid PCA is the most commonly used modality for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. The information from this study will enable ascertainment of the best method for allowing patients good functional recovery, whilst minimizing opioid side effects.

4. Objectives

The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of adductor canal nerve block, with and without intravenous dexamethasone, and continuous adductor canal blockade with a catheter to ascertain cumulative opioid consumption post-operatively. Specifically, the trial seeks to answer whether the adductor canal block with dexamethasone fares no worse (non-inferior) than a continuous catheter.

The secondary aims are to compare the quality of anesthesia recovery using the QoR-40 questionnaire administered at 48 hours postoperatively, pain score, length of hospital stay, complications of nerve blockade, incidence of catheter dislodgement and opioid side effects (nausea/vomiting) with the different techniques.

5. Research Methods

Trial Design

This will be a randomize controlled, non-blinded, non-inferiority trial, involving patients having primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. There are three arms: adductor canal single injection (baseline control), adductor canal single injection plus dexamethasone (test intervention) and adductor canal catheter (active control).

Setting

This will be a single-centre trial at UBC Hospital (UBCH).

B. Randomization

Prior to surgery, for each consented patient, a sealed unmarked opaque envelope will be opened to determine the modality of analgesia that the patient will receive. The patients will either receive an adductor canal block postoperatively, an adductor canal block postoperatively along with intravenous dexamethasone, or have an adductor canal catheter placed postoperatively for continuous adductor canal blockade.

D. Data Collection

Demographic data including patient age, sex, height, weight, BMI, and medications including analgesics, comorbidities and American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification will be determined from the anesthetic record.

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores from 0-10 as well as cumulative opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents will be determined at set time points of 12, 24, 48 hours. The data will be determined from the patient's pain flow sheet and medication administration record (MAR), which are part of the standard charting found on the hospital ward. Opioid data from PCA will be obtained from the hospital database which electronically logs usage. The patient's chart will also be used to note anti-emetic medication usage. At 48 hours, all participants will be provided with a QoR-40 questionnaire, a validated 40 item questionnaire on the quality of recovery from anesthesia. The time of discharge will be recorded from the hospital data base.

Complications from adductor canal catheters will be recorded, such as catheter dislodgement and site infection. For patients unable to complete the study, the reason will be noted and data will be included in an intention to treat analysis.

E. Statistical Analysis

Sample Size:

The investigators do not have institutional data of standard deviation (SD) of morphine equivalent consumption for primary total knee arthroplasty. Based on previous studies, the standard deviation of morphine equivalent consumption at 24h is estimated to be 20 mg IV. We consider a reduction of 10 mg to be clinically relevant at this time point and therefore set it as the non-inferiority margin. Using the following online calculator: https://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/continuous-noninferior/ based on a power of 80% and significance level of 5%, the number of patients required per group is 50. The aim is to recruit 60 patients per group to account for potential drop outs.

6. Data Analysis: Categorical data will be analysed with chi-squared tests. Numeric variables will be compared with independent T-tests if distributions were normal. If Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test for normality of distribution was significant non-parametric Mann Whitney U tests will be utilized. Statistical significance will be assumed if P <0.05. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT02798835
Study type Interventional
Source University of British Columbia
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
Start date July 2016
Completion date December 2016

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03542981 - Interferential Current Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT04458480 - Effect of Fast Inpatient Rehabilitation After TKA
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Recruiting NCT06061367 - Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
Recruiting NCT05391828 - Persona MC vs PS RCT With ROSA N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04850300 - Efficiency Assessment of the Methodology for the Follow-up of Patients With Knee Prostheses Phase 3
Completed NCT05635916 - Trial of Liposomal Bupivacaine for TKA Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05130216 - Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Withdrawn NCT02495805 - Ultrasound-guided Continuous Proximal Adductor Canal vs Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control and Rehabilitation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT03206554 - Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01511211 - Duration of Leg Nerve Blocks With Dexamethasone Added to Local Anesthetic Phase 4
Completed NCT01616836 - Optimizing Pain and Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT00958945 - Retrospective Chart Analysis in the Effective Use of FloSeal in Post-Operative Joint Replacements N/A
Completed NCT00985920 - Topical Tranexamic Acid for Total Knee Arthroplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT00761956 - A Study to Compare the NexGen CR and CR-Flex Knee Implants N/A
Completed NCT03289247 - Tissue Adhaesive in Wound Closure Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Terminated NCT03316118 - US Guided GNB vs Saline Injection for TKA Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05962970 - Continuous Adductor Canal Block in Fast Track Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT03317834 - Navio With Total Knee Arthroplasty
Enrolling by invitation NCT06188091 - Joint Movement to Increase Range of Motion in Knee Joint After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A