Tooth Fractures Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Assessment of Two Inlay -Retained Bridge Designs (Proximal Box Shaped and Inlay Shaped) in Missing Posterior Teeth Cases
in the last years, dentistry is going to the concept of conservatism to preserve the most amount of tooth structure, so the evolution of new ceramic materials with invasive designs like (inlay- shaped and proximal box shaped) inlay retained bridge, the investigators can restore single missing posterior teeth with less invasive techniques and less rate of restoration fracture.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 70 |
Est. completion date | February 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 51 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Absence of periapical or periodontal or diseases - sound abutment teeth or with small caries or filling on occlusal or proximal surfaces - Maintenance of good oral hygiene - No tooth mobility or grade 1 can be accepted - Sufficient occluso-gingival tooth height (5mm) - Good alignment of abutment teeth - mesiodistal edentulous space preferred not exceed 12mm Exclusion Criteria: - Patients under the age of 18 or being incapable of taking out a contract - Patients with any medical condition that impaired correct oral hygiene - Endodontic ally treated abutment teeth - a conspicuous medical or psychological history - bruxism, or known allergic reaction to the materials used - limited vertical space for the required connector height of 4mm - pregnant female patients |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | fracture | resistance of restoration to disintegrate and the assessment for the outcome will be done by using MUSPHS scale and the measuring unit is score | 1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03136276 -
One Year Clinical Evaluation of IPS Empress CAD Versus Polished Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04029324 -
Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01520766 -
Prefabricated Endodontic Posts: Glass Fiber Versus Titanium - A Randomized Controlled Pilot- Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02494427 -
Comparison of Conventional and CAD/CAM Dental Restorations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03594019 -
Immediate Implant Placement With Connective Tissue Graft or Socket Shield
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03331887 -
E-max CAD Crowns Retained With Fiber Reinforced Composite Post Versus E-max CAD Endocrowns
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03129711 -
Patient Satisfaction of Glazed IPS Empress CAD Versus Glazed Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05505084 -
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction.
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02532543 -
Comparative Volumetric Assessment of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing Different Bone Grafting Materials
|
N/A |