Tissue Retraction System Clinical Trial
— TRSOfficial title:
Pilot Study on a New Endoscopic Platform for the ESD of Colorectal Lesions: Tissue Retraction System
| NCT number | NCT03553199 |
| Other study ID # | TRS |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | May 28, 2018 |
| Est. completion date | December 31, 2020 |
| Verified date | March 2021 |
| Source | Istituto Clinico Humanitas |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic technique that allows the removal of lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) suggests to consider ESD for the removal of colorectal lesions that cannot be removed enbloc with standard polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and for lesions that are > 20 mm in diameter, with a high probability of having a limited submucosal invasion. ESD is a technically difficult and time-consuming procedure that is very difficult to learn and to perform, but it allows higher enbloc resection rates compared to other endoscopic techniques and is less invasive than surgery requiring less length of hospital stay. Recently, several new techniques and devices have been developed to facilitate ESD and to overcome difficulties related to challenging situations. The main difficulties are related to the instability of the operating field, due to the physiologic peristalsis, and to the loss of traction, due to the single operating channel.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 15 |
| Est. completion date | December 31, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - left colon and rectal lesions matching the criteria of ESD removal: depressed/flat elevated morphology and irregular or nongranular surface pattern, larger than 20 mm; lesions that cannot be optimally and radically removed with standard polypectomy or EMR - age =18 years - ability to sign the informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - deep submucosal invasion diagnosed by distorted pit (Kudo's type V) and/or capillary (Sano's type III) patterns [5]; - poor general condition (American Society of Anesthesiologists score = 3); - coagulation disorders; - pregnancy and breastfeeding; - inability to sign the informed consent. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | Humanitas Research Hospital | Rozzano |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Istituto Clinico Humanitas |
Italy,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Primary endpoint is the feasibility, defined as the technical success rate, to perform an enbloc ESD with the assistance of the TRS. | 9 months | ||
| Secondary | Secondary endpoints are: the efficacy, defined as the rate of lesions removed enbloc and the rate of curative ESD (with an R0 resection); the safety, defined as the rate of adverse events (AEs). | 12 months |