Thoracic Paravertebral Block Clinical Trial
Official title:
Radiological Evaluation of Thoracic Paravertebral Catheters: A Prospective Clinical Trial
Thoracic operations are known to be painful and requiring an adequate postoperative pain
therapy. A well documented technique to achieve postoperative analgesia is the use of
paravertebral catheters. Theoretically the thoracic paravertebral block results in an
unilateral thoracic anaesthesia. However, in the daily clinical practice it remains unclear
whether catheters are placed correctly into the paravertebral region. The investigators'
experiences with paravertebral catheters suggest that there may be many displacements of
catheters since the pain control is reduced compared to epidural analgesia.
The aim of this prospective observational clinical trial is to postoperatively evaluate the
exact location of paravertebral catheter placed for thoracoscopic interventions by using the
classical land-mark puncture technique. After radiological detection of the catheter
position, the spread and distribution of contrast dye injected through the catheters will be
evaluated.
Background
The paravertebral block is a regional anaesthetic technique which can be used for analgesia
after thoracic, cardiac, breast surgery, upper abdominal surgery or for pain therapy.
Thoracic paravertebral blockade is performed by injecting a local anaesthetic solution into
the paravertebral space, which contains the thoracic nerves, their branches and the
sympathetic trunk. This space is a wedge-shaped area sandwiched between the heads and necks
of the ribs. The posterior wall is formed by the superior costo-transverse ligament, the
antero-lateral wall is the parietal pleura with the endothoracic fascia and the medial wall
is the lateral surface of the vertebral body and disc. Also medially, there is communication
with the epidural space via the intervertebral foramen. It has been shown, that each space
communicates inferiorly and superiorly across the heads and necks of the ribs. Thus
injecting local anaesthetic in the paravertebral space should results to an analgesia
corresponding to a unilateral epidural anaesthesia.
Unilateral multisegmental anaesthesia after single-shot paravertebral injection of local
anaesthetics is well established. On the other hand, a variety of different studies on
volunteers, patients and cadavers showed conflicting results regarding the vertical spread
over several adjacent segments after paravertebral injection leading to the recommendation
of some authors to use a multi-injection technique to achieve a multilevel somatic nerve
blockade, specially described during breast surgery using paravertebral block alone.
Can we explain these different contradictory reports and recommendations? Available
radiologic and anatomic studies show many different patterns of contrast dye spread after
single shot paravertebral contrast dye injection. One study even reports different
distribution of dye even after several paravertebral single shots of the same operator in
the same patient. Some radiological studies report cloud-like contrast dye accumulation
without significant cranio-caudal spread. This could be due to the restricted intercostal
spread or to subpleural spread or even to injection of the contrast dye into the
autochthonic muscles of the back.
The spread of local anesthetics (or contrast dye as substitute) is affected by nuances of
differences in the needle placement because of the fine membranes like the endothoracica
fascia. This might be the major problem during the insertion of catheters. The final
location of catheter tip is hard to predict. Catheters might dissect during the insertion
and possibly the difference is only a more medial or more lateral puncture. The placement of
catheters into the paravertebral space leading to a clear cranio-caudal spread of local
anaesthetics resulting in multisegmental spread of anaesthesia is the goal of a catheter for
paravertebral analgesia but it seems not easy to be achieved - despite of an uncontestable
clinical benefit of paravertebral catheters for pain relief.
Studies describing the exact emplacement of catheters, distribution of contrast dye and
correlation of this distribution with the clinical effect after catheter placement by the
classical land-mark based approach as described by Eason and Wyatt are lacking. We therefore
aim to describe the different possible emplacements of the catheters, the resulting spread
of contrast dye after injection through the catheters as well as the corresponding area of
somatic and sympathetic block.
Objective
The aim of prospective observational clinical trial is to evaluate the exact location of
paravertebral catheter placed for thoracoscopic interventions using the classic landmark
approach by injecting a small amount of contrast dye (1 ml) through the catheter and
subsequent fluoroscopic documentation of the catheter tip localisation. Thereafter a larger
amount (20 ml) of diluted contrast dye will be injected and its spread will be documented
fluoroscopically.
Methods
Once the paravertebral catheter is placed as usual after the end of surgery, 1 ml of
contrast dye will be injected through the catheter. After fluoroscopic documentation of the
catheter tip, further 10 ml of diluted contrast dye will be injected and its spread again
documented fluoroscopically in two planes. All saved pictures, showing the catheter tip
position and the contrast dye spread, will be evaluated subsequently by an independent
radiologist. After these fluoroscopic examinations a test dose of Bupivacaine 0.25% mixed
with Adrenaline 5 mcg/ml of 3ml will be injected through the catheter followed by an
injection of 0.3ml/kg of local anaesthetics (Bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with Adrenaline 5
mcg/ml). One hour later a clinical testing of the skin area with somatic and sympathetic
block provided through the paravertebral catheters will be performed and the data recorded.
;
Observational Model: Case-Only, Time Perspective: Prospective
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05538884 -
A Novel Intertransverse Plane Block: a Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Volunteer Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03540537 -
A Trial Comparing Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Paravertebral Block (PVTB) for Postoperative Analgesia in Hepatectomy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06431880 -
External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Post Thoracotomy Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04855994 -
Comparison of Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Pectoral Nerve Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04425447 -
Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Gynecomastia Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06165991 -
Efficacy and Safety of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04710823 -
Ultrasound- Guided Continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Ultrasound- Guided Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Multiple Traumatic Rib Fractures.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05255562 -
Comparison of Combined Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04656821 -
Erector Spinae Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Acute Thoracic Herpes Zoster
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05700357 -
Different Local Anesthetic Volumes for TPVB in Post-thoracotomy Analgesia
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01755910 -
Effect of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04457115 -
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Pain Control in Modified Radical Mastectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05357976 -
The Effects of Body Mass Index on Thoracic Paravertebral Block Analgesia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04964401 -
US-Guided ESPB Versus TPVB on Acute and Chronic Pain After VATS
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04929665 -
Thoracic Paravertebral Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block, and in Combined Paravertebral-erector Spinae Block
|
N/A |