Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01495936
Other study ID # HSREB 18480
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received December 16, 2011
Last updated November 1, 2017
Start date October 17, 2011
Est. completion date December 2017

Study information

Verified date November 2017
Source Lawson Health Research Institute
Contact Neal Badner, MD, FRCP (C)
Phone 519 685 8500
Email Neal.Badner@lhsc.on.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients requiring one lung ventilation (OLV) for open thoracic surgery will be ventilated (breathing performed by a breathing machine) during anesthesia using a lung protective ventilation strategy (small breath volumes at 6ml/kg). During thoracic surgery the anesthesiologist is able to ventilate only one lung by inserting a special breathing tube, allowing the surgeon to operate on the non ventilated (diseased) lung. In a randomized trial two interventions used to improve blood oxygen levels during one lung ventilation will be compared . The two interventions are:

1. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) applied to the non ventilated (non breathing) lung and

2. Positive End Expiratory Pressure following a lung Recruitment Maneuver (RM-PEEP) to the ventilated (breathing) lung.

CPAP is performed by applying a steady flow of oxygen to the non ventilated (non breathing) lung at a continuous gentle pressure of 5cmH20.

To perform a Recruitment Maneuver (RM) the anesthesiologist inflates the ventilated (breathing) lung with oxygen, holding the breath for 25 seconds so all the lung is opened up. Immediately after the recruitment maneuver PEEP will be applied. PEEP is an action which also helps keep the lung open, maintaining the benefits achieved by the RM. It is performed by adjusting settings on the ventilator (breathing machine). The ventilator creates and applies a gentle pressure (5cmH20) to the ventilating lung at the end of each breath.

The outcome measure will be the oxygen content in blood (PaO2), measured in mmHg, using blood sample analysis.

The null hypothesis is that compared to CPAP, RM-PEEP does not significantly increase the oxygen content of blood during OLV when using a lung protective ventilation strategy.


Description:

Patients requiring one lung ventilation (OLV) for open thoracic surgery will be ventilated intra-operatively using a lung protective ventilation strategy (small tidal volumes {Vts} at 6ml/kg Ideal Body Weight {IBW}). In a randomized, crossover trial Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to the non ventilated lung or a Recruitment Maneuver (RM) followed by the application of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) (acronym RM-PEEP) to the ventilated lung will be applied and blood oxygenation (PaO2) measured by arterial blood gas sampling to determine which intervention has the most beneficial effect on PaO2 (CPAP or RM-PEEP).

CPAP will be applied at a pressure of 5cmH2O by a CPAP breathing circuit (designed for the purpose and commonly used in anesthetic practice). The PEEP will be applied at a pressure of 5cmH20 by the operating room (OR) anesthetic machine. The RM will involve a valsalva maneuver, held for 5 seconds at a pressure of 25cmH20, again performed using the OR anesthetic machine.

Null hypothesis: Compared to CPAP, RM-PEEP does not significantly increase PaO2 or reduce the incidence of hypoxia (oxygen blood saturation less than or equal to 90%), when employing a lung protective ventilation strategy.

This study is based on our previous research (citation 12, Badner et al) in which we compared CPAP to PEEP alone (omitting the recruitment maneuver). Here it was noted that CPAP to the non ventilated lung improved oxygenation more than PEEP to the ventilated lung (even though PEEP is an easier modality to provide), when employing a lung protective ventilation strategy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date December 2017
Est. primary completion date December 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18 or older

2. Competent to give consent to enroll in study

3. Booked for scheduled open thoracotomy which involves wedge resection, lobectomy or pneumonectomy requiring OLV

4. American Society of Anesthesia physical status score (ASA) 1-4

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Unable to give consent

2. Pregnant women

3. Inability to insert an arterial line

4. Presence of other significant pulmonary impairment (PaO2 on room air <50mmHg, PaCO2 >50mmHg or known pulmonary hypertension (mean PAP>25mmHg)

5. Presence of significant cardiovascular disease

6. Altered liver function (Child Pugh scale =B)

7. Patients with bullous lung disease. -

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
RM + Positive End Expiratory Pressure
A recruitment maneuver (RM) will be applied to the ventilated lung by performing a valsalva maneuver for 5 seconds (holding the inspiratory pressure at 25cmH2O). Immediately after the RM, Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) will be applied to the ventilated lung at a pressure of 5cmH2O for 20 minutes. Both the RM and PEEP will be performed using the operating room ventilator.
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Continuous positive airway pressure, at a pressure of 5cmH2O will applied to the non-ventilated lung for 20 minutes by the Mallinckrodt Bronchocath Disposable CPAP system (a recognised anesthetic breathing system design for CPAP)

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Victoria Hospital London Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Lawson Health Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (12)

Badner NH, Goure C, Bennett KE, Nicolaou G. Role of continuous positive airway pressure to the non-ventilated lung during one-lung ventilation with low tidal volumes. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011;3(3):189-94. — View Citation

Cohen E, Eisenkraft JB, Thys DM, Kirschner PA, Kaplan JA. Oxygenation and hemodynamic changes during one-lung ventilation: effects of CPAP10, PEEP10, and CPAP10/PEEP10. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1988 Feb;2(1):34-40. — View Citation

Fan E, Wilcox ME, Brower RG, Stewart TE, Mehta S, Lapinsky SE, Meade MO, Ferguson ND. Recruitment maneuvers for acute lung injury: a systematic review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Dec 1;178(11):1156-63. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200802-335OC. Epub 2008 Sep 5. Review. — View Citation

Fernández-Pérez ER, Keegan MT, Brown DR, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O. Intraoperative tidal volume as a risk factor for respiratory failure after pneumonectomy. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):14-8. — View Citation

Hoftman N, Canales C, Leduc M, Mahajan A. Positive end expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation: selecting ideal patients and ventilator settings with the aim of improving arterial oxygenation. Ann Card Anaesth. 2011 Sep-Dec;14(3):183-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.83991. — View Citation

Karzai W, Schwarzkopf K. Hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation: prediction, prevention, and treatment. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1402-11. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819fb15d. Review. — View Citation

Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A, Robert J, Diaper J, Chevalley C, Tschopp JM. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Anesth Analg. 2003 Dec;97(6):1558-65. — View Citation

Licker M, Diaper J, Villiger Y, Spiliopoulos A, Licker V, Robert J, Tschopp JM. Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R41. doi: 10.1186/cc7762. Epub 2009 Mar 24. — View Citation

Michelet P, D'Journo XB, Roch A, Doddoli C, Marin V, Papazian L, Decamps I, Bregeon F, Thomas P, Auffray JP. Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2006 Nov;105(5):911-9. — View Citation

Schilling T, Kozian A, Huth C, Bühling F, Kretzschmar M, Welte T, Hachenberg T. The pulmonary immune effects of mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):957-65, table of contents. — View Citation

Schultz MJ, Haitsma JJ, Slutsky AS, Gajic O. What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury? Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1226-31. Review. — View Citation

Tusman G, Böhm SH, Sipmann FS, Maisch S. Lung recruitment improves the efficiency of ventilation and gas exchange during one-lung ventilation anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jun;98(6):1604-9, table of contents. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Partial pressure of oxygen in blood Time 0 (the patient is anesthetized and being ventilated on two lungs, just prior to the commencement of one lung ventilation). Time 20 minutes (patient has been ventilated on one lung for 20 minutes and immediately prior to instituting one of the two intervention arms). Time 40 minutes (following a period of 20 minutes on one intervention arm [either CPAP or RM-PEEP]. The patient will then enter second intervention arm). Time 60 minutes ( 20 minutes after second intervention arm [either CPAP or RM-PEEP]) Day 1
Secondary Hypoxia The incidence of hypoxia (oxygen saturation falling below 90%, measured by pulse oximetry) throughout the entire study period will be recorded and correlated with the study stage. Day 1
Secondary Hypoxia intervention techniques The incidence of necessary hypoxia (oxygen saturation below 90%) intervention techniques (performed by the attending anesthesiologist) will be recorded once the patient has been commenced on one lung ventilation. The interventions recorded will be
The need to revert back to two lung ventilation
The need to clamp the operative pulmonary artery
The need to add CPAP to the non ventilated lung despite being in the RM-PEEP arm of the study.
The need to add a RM-PEEP to the ventilated lung despite being in the CPAP arm of the study
Day 1