Teeth Whitening Clinical Trial
Official title:
Tooth Whitening Evaluation With Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effect of Commercial Whitening Toothpastes on Oral Mucosal Cells
Verified date | July 2020 |
Source | University of Zagreb |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Bleaching discolored vital teeth is one of the most popular aesthetic treatment in dentistry
in the last decade. Teeth whitening can be performed by professionals/dentists in the dental
office ("in-office") and by the patients themselves at home (over-the-counter). A generally
available method for teeth whitening is to use toothpastes which contain whitening
ingredients. This method presents commercial option to remove discolorations on the enamel
surface of vital teeth. There are many commercially available dentifrices that contain
whitening agents, such as abrasives, chemical or optical agents. It has been noticed that
whitening agents added in toothpastes can provide whitening effect visible to human eye that
can objectively be evaluated by using sprectrophotometers. The results of teeth whitening can
also be obtained subjectively by observation and comparison to tooth shade guide. Also, these
products must be used with caution as they may cause some negative effects, such as dentinal
hypersensitivity, irritations, peeling/exfoliation, dry mouth, rougher teeth and cytotoxic
and genotoxic effect on oral mucosa cells. Studies that have already been conducted with
whitening agents are based on abrasives, peroxides, optical agents and activated charcoal.
The main objective in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of different brands of
toothpastes with whitening effect and their performance (effect) on oral mucosa cells. As a
measure of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in cells, the number of micronuclei and other
morphological changes of the nucleus are determined (micronucleus assay). Other specific
objectives are to investigate the patient satisfaction with the characteristic of treatment
such as final tooth color, color stability, length of treatment, comfort during treatment and
overall participant satisfaction.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 210 |
Est. completion date | September 30, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | July 31, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - age of 18 and older - non smokers - good oral and general health - excellent oral hygiene - vital six anterior maxillary teeth free of caries or restorations - tooth shade A2 or darker - no cervical lesions or prosthodontic treatments - no periodontal disease Exclusion Criteria: - pregnant women - breastfeeding women - individuals with discolored teeth (tetracycline stain, fluorosis) - tooth sensitivity - history of allergy to any dental hygiene product - individuals who had previously undergone any tooth whitening treatment |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Croatia | School of the Medicine, University of Split | Split |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Zagreb |
Croatia,
Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):195-200. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.52902. — View Citation
Angel P, Bersezio C, Estay J, Werner A, Retamal H, Araya C, Martin J, Fernández E. Color stability, psychosocial impact, and effect on self-perception of esthetics of tooth whitening using low-concentration (6%) hydrogen peroxide. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(7):557-566. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a40468. — View Citation
Bolognesi C, Knasmueller S, Nersesyan A, Thomas P, Fenech M. The HUMNxl scoring criteria for different cell types and nuclear anomalies in the buccal micronucleus cytome assay - an update and expanded photogallery. Mutat Res. 2013 Oct-Dec;753(2):100-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 11. Review. — View Citation
Camargo SE, Jóias RP, Santana-Melo GF, Ferreira LT, El Achkar VN, Rode Sde M. Conventional and whitening toothpastes: cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and effect on the enamel surface. Am J Dent. 2014 Dec;27(6):307-11. — View Citation
Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e2-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 1. Review. — View Citation
Collins LZ, Naeeni M, Schäfer F, Brignoli C, Schiavi A, Roberts J, Colgan P. The effect of a calcium carbonate/perlite toothpaste on the removal of extrinsic tooth stain in two weeks. Int Dent J. 2005;55(3 Suppl 1):179-82. — View Citation
Epple M, Meyer F, Enax J. A Critical Review of Modern Concepts for Teeth Whitening. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Aug 1;7(3). pii: E79. doi: 10.3390/dj7030079. Review. — View Citation
Franco MC, Uehara J, Meroni BM, Zuttion GS, Cenci MS. The Effect of a Charcoal-based Powder for Enamel Dental Bleaching. Oper Dent. 2020 Apr 3. doi: 10.2341/19-122-L. [Epub ahead of print] — View Citation
Ghassemi A, Hooper W, Vorwerk L, Domke T, DeSciscio P, Nathoo S. Effectiveness of a new dentifrice with baking soda and peroxide in removing extrinsic stain and whitening teeth. J Clin Dent. 2012;23(3):86-91. — View Citation
Hara AT, Turssi CP. Baking soda as an abrasive in toothpastes: Mechanism of action and safety and effectiveness considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Nov;148(11S):S27-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.09.007. Review. — View Citation
Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch-Volders M, Bonassi S, Zeiger E, Knasmueller S, Fenech M. The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: the HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutat Res. 2008 Jul-Aug;659(1-2):93-108. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Apr 11. Review. — View Citation
Joiner A, Luo W. Tooth colour and whiteness: A review. J Dent. 2017 Dec;67S:S3-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 18. Review. — View Citation
Joiner A. Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 May 24. Review. — View Citation
Kalliath C, Mukunda A, Pynadath M, Venugopal V, Prethweeraj J. Comparison between the effect of commercially available chemical teeth whitening paste and teeth whitening paste containing ingredients of herbal origin on human enamel. Ayu. 2018 Apr-Jun;39(2):113-117. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_82_18. — View Citation
Kalyana P, Shashidhar A, Meghashyam B, Sreevidya KR, Sweta S. Stain removal efficacy of a novel dentifrice containing papain and Bromelain extracts--an in vitro study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2011 Aug;9(3):229-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00473.x. Epub 2010 Jul 1. — View Citation
Kershaw S, Newton JT, Williams DM. The influence of tooth colour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among female dental patients: comparisons of unmodified, decayed and 'whitened' teeth. Br Dent J. 2008 Mar 8;204(5):E9; discussion 256-7. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.134. Epub 2008 Feb 15. — View Citation
Korifi R, Le Dréau Y, Antinelli JF, Valls R, Dupuy N. CIEL*a*b* color space predictive models for colorimetry devices--analysis of perfume quality. Talanta. 2013 Jan 30;104:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Nov 23. — View Citation
Lippert F. An introduction to toothpaste - its purpose, history and ingredients. Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:1-14. doi: 10.1159/000350456. Epub 2013 Jun 28. — View Citation
Martin J, Rivas V, Vildósola P, Moncada L, Oliveira Junior OB, Saad JR, Fernandez E, Moncada G. Personality Style in Patients Looking for Tooth Bleaching and Its Correlation with Treatment Satisfaction. Braz Dent J. 2016 Jan-Feb;27(1):60-5. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600127. — View Citation
Parameswaran V, Anilkumar S, Lylajam S, Rajesh C, Narayan V. Comparison of accuracies of an intraoral spectrophotometer and conventional visual method for shade matching using two shade guide systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):352-358. — View Citation
Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: A comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Mar;31(2):103-112. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12465. Epub 2019 Mar 20. Review. — View Citation
Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Dental color standards: shade tab arrangement. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13(4):254-63. — View Citation
Patil PA, Ankola AV, Hebbal MI, Patil AC. Comparison of effectiveness of abrasive and enzymatic action of whitening toothpastes in removal of extrinsic stains - a clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 Feb;13(1):25-9. doi: 10.1111/idh.12090. Epub 2014 Jul 21. — View Citation
Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hämmerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002 Aug;81(8):578-82. — View Citation
Pickles MJ, Evans M, Philpotts CJ, Joiner A, Lynch RJ, Noel N, Laucello M. In vitro efficacy of a whitening toothpaste containing calcium carbonate and perlite. Int Dent J. 2005;55(3 Suppl 1):197-202. — View Citation
Sabherwal RS, Gonzalez J, Naini FB. Assessing the influence of skin color and tooth shade value on perceived smile attractiveness. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Jun;140(6):696-705. — View Citation
Tadin A, Galic N, Mladinic M, Marovic D, Kovacic I, Zeljezic D. Genotoxicity in gingival cells of patients undergoing tooth restoration with two different dental composite materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jan;18(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0933-3. Epub 2013 Feb 5. — View Citation
Tadin A, Gavic L, Govic T, Galic N, Zorica Vladislavic N, Zeljezic D. In vivo evaluation of fluoride and sodium lauryl sulphate in toothpaste on buccal epithelial cells toxicity. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jul;77(5):386-393. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1577988. Epub 2019 Feb 20. Erratum in: Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Aug;77(6):483. — View Citation
Tadin A, Gavic L, Zeravica A, Ugrin K, Galic N, Zeljezic D. Assessment of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of conventional and whitening kinds of toothpaste on oral mucosa cells. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Jan;76(1):64-70. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1384567. Epub 2017 Sep 29. — View Citation
Thomas P, Fenech M. Buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;682:235-48. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-409-8_17. — View Citation
Tolbert PE, Shy CM, Allen JW. Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutat Res. 1992 Feb;271(1):69-77. — View Citation
Torres-Bugarín O, Zavala-Cerna MG, Nava A, Flores-García A, Ramos-Ibarra ML. Potential uses, limitations, and basic procedures of micronuclei and nuclear abnormalities in buccal cells. Dis Markers. 2014;2014:956835. doi: 10.1155/2014/956835. Epub 2014 Feb 4. Review. — View Citation
van Loveren C, Duckworth RM. Anti-calculus and whitening toothpastes. Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:61-74. doi: 10.1159/000350698. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Review. — View Citation
Vaz VTP, Jubilato DP, Oliveira MRM, Bortolatto JF, Floros MC, Dantas AAR, Oliveira Junior OB. Whitening toothpaste containing activated charcoal, blue covarine, hydrogen peroxide or microbeads: which one is the most effective? J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jan 14;27:e20180051. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0051. — View Citation
* Note: There are 34 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Color assessment before the treatment (T0) | The following measurements were will be recorded: L*,a*, b* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ?E is will be calculated using the following formula: ?E=v(?(?L*)?^2+?(?a*)?^2+?(?b*)?^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ?E, ?L*, ?a* and ?b*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence. | 0 days | |
Primary | Color change after 30 days of treatment (T1) | The following measurements were will be recorded: L*,a*, b* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ?E is will be calculated using the following formula: ?E=v(?(?L*)?^2+?(?a*)?^2+?(?b*)?^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ?E, ?L*, ?a* and ?b*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence. | 30 days | |
Primary | Color change after 60 days of treatment (T2) | The following measurements were will be recorded: L*,a*, b* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ?E is will be calculated using the following formula: ?E=v(?(?L*)?^2+?(?a*)?^2+?(?b*)?^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ?E, ?L*, ?a* and ?b*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence. | 60 days | |
Primary | Color change 30 days after the treatment (90 days from the beginning of treatment) (T3) | The following measurements were will be recorded: L*,a*, b* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ?E is will be calculated using the following formula: ?E=v(?(?L*)?^2+?(?a*)?^2+?(?b*)?^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ?E, ?L*, ?a* and ?b*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence. | 90 days | |
Primary | Assessment of biocompatibility before the treatment (T0) | Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay. | 0 days | |
Primary | Assessment of biocompatibility after 30 days of treatment (T1) | Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay. | 30 days | |
Primary | Assessment of biocompatibility after 60 days of treatment (T2) | Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay. | 60 days | |
Primary | Assessment of biocompatibility 30 days after the treatment (90 days from the beginning of treatment) (T3) | Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay. | 90 days | |
Secondary | Assessment of participant's satisfaction with treatment and used toothpaste after 60 days of treatment | Assessment of participant's satisfaction with treatment and used toothpaste will be performed by prepared questionnaire for the study. Respondents will complete a questionnaire of eating and living habits, too | 60 days | |
Secondary | Assessment of participant's satisfaction with treatment of used toothpaste 30 days after the treatment (90 days from the beginning of treatment) | Assessment of participant's satisfaction with treatment and used toothpaste will be performed by prepared questionnaire for the study. | 90 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06035588 -
Efficacy in the Reduction of Hypersensitivity During Home Whitening With 16% Carbamide Peroxide Applied on Alternate Days
|
N/A |