Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The use of tissue adhesives for the closure of surgical incisions is becoming increasingly common. Several publications exist purporting the equivalence of tissue adhesive to suture with regard to dehiscence, infection, and cosmesis. Two of the most frequently used adhesives are Histoacryl© and Dermabond©. Despite their popularity, only one study exists comparing the two. In this non-English study only small wounds in an exclusively pediatric population were studied (12). Operative time, cost, and objective measures of scar size were not examined. In the present study we aim to evaluate the relatively large surgical incisions resulting from breast reduction, mastopexy, panniculectomy, and abdominoplasty closed with either Histoacryl©, Dermabond©, or subcuticular suture. The primary aim is to investigate differences in time to wound closure. Secondary aims are to compare the three approaches with respect to cost, dehiscence, infection, scar size, and cosmesis.


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT00890578
Study type Observational
Source Mayo Clinic
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
Start date April 2009
Completion date February 2011

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03020420 - Clinical Trial To Study The Anti-scarring Effect Of Cicatricell N/A
Withdrawn NCT00872638 - The Effect of Wound Edge Eversion on Cosmesis N/A
Completed NCT01835405 - LiquiBand Versus Dermabond Versus Sutures for Closure of Surgical Wounds N/A
Completed NCT00557947 - Prineo (Dermabond Protape) Versus Sutures for Full-thickness Surgical Incisions Phase 4