Application of Percutaneous Electrolysis, Percutaneous Neuromodulation and Eccentric Exercise

Supraspinatus Tendinitis Clinical Trial

— MRH-EPTE  

Official title:

Application of Ultrasound-guided Electrolysis, Percutaneous Neuromodulation and Eccentric Exercise in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03184181
• Other study ID #: 168/16
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: November 1, 2017
• Est. completion date: February 1, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: University of Cadiz
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy show a big impact, however, there is a lack of awareness about the options of the physiotherapist treatment. It is necessary to do studies about effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous electrolysis (EPTE®). This technique enables treatment of the tendinopathies and the broken muscle fibrilare. It is base on the application of galvanic current through a acupuncture needle. To analyze the effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous electrolysis (EPTE®) in the treatment of supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Single center randomized controlled trial, parallel treatment design. A specialist physician will be diagnosed the supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive treatmen for 4 weeks: EPTE® associated with eccentric exercises or dry needling with the same eccentric exercises. Both interventions were performed under ultrasound guidance with a portable ultrasound (General Electric LogicE). Data will be collected by a blinded evaluator.

Description:

Eccentric exercises of the supraspinatus muscle were performed in 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Participants were asked to perform the exercise program on an individual basis twice every day for 4 weeks. The eccentric program consisted of 3 exercises, focusing on the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and scapular muscles. Participants were asked to do a normal abduction (concentric phase) and a slow return to the initial position (eccentric phase) included first the concentric phase, and the eccentric phase was slowly conducted. The exercise program was taught by a physiotherapist in the first session and monitored in the subsequent sessions.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 32
• Est. completion date: February 1, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: January 1, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 25 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients diagnosed with supraspinatus tendinopathies that do not improve with conventional physiotherapy or pharmacological therapy protocols.

• Subjects who are in an active state of pain, who present painful symptoms in a sensitive and painful area of the tendon of insertion of the supraspinatus muscle in the humerus.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Individuals who have received surgery intervention in the same shoulder, or have suffered fractures or dislocations in the same shoulder.

• Individuals have received the proposed treatment in one month´s period previously.

• Individuals who suffering from cervical radiculopathies, fibromialgia síndrome, cardiac patients with pacemakers, cancer, infectious processes, or generalized lymphedema.

• Pregnant women can not receive this treatment intervention.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Supraspinatus Tendinitis
• Tendinopathy

Intervention

Other:
• EPTE® group
Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis once week for four weeks associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.
• Dry needling group
The intervention for this group consisted of dry needling in trigger points associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Policlínica Santa María	Cadiz	Cádiz

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Cadiz	Jorge Manuel Góngora Rodriguez, Manuel Rodriguez Huguet, Pablo Rodriguez Huguet, Rocío Martín Valero

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (2)

Arias-Buria JL, Truyols-Dominguez S, Valero-Alcaide R, Salom-Moreno J, Atin-Arratibel MA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrolysis and Eccentric Exercises for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:315219. doi: 10.1155/2015/315219. Epub 2015 Nov 15. — View Citation

Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The intensity of shoulder pain	A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).	Baseline
Secondary	The intensity of shoulder pain	A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).	Four weeks
Secondary	The intensity of shoulder pain	A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).	Eight weeks
Secondary	The intensity of shoulder pain	A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).	One year
Secondary	Active shoulder range of motion	Measured by a two branches goniometer	Baseline, four weeks and one year.
Secondary	Pressure pain thresholds in supraspinatus trigger points	Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be measured with a pressure algometer (Baseline, Pain TestTM, Wagner Instruments). The clinimetric properties of this instrument have been evaluated previously. The PPT will the point at which pressure elicited pain and will presented as kilograms per square centimeter. All measurements will be conducted by the same well-trained physician.	Baseline, four weeks and one year.