Adolescent and Child Suicide Prevention in Routine Clinical Encounters — ASPIRE  

Suicide Clinical Trial

Official title: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Strategies to Implement Firearm Safety Promotion as a Universal Suicide Prevention Strategy in Pediatric Primary Care

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this study is to compare two approaches to implement an evidence-based firearm safety promotion program, S.A.F.E. Firearm, in pediatric primary care as a universal suicide prevention strategy. The first implementation approach is a prompt in the electronic health record (EHR; Nudge) reminding clinicians to a) discuss firearm storage and b) offer a free cable firearm lock during the pediatric well visit. The second implementation approach (Nudge+) includes both the EHR Nudge described above plus one year of support to the clinics in deploying the program (i.e., practice facilitation). The study also aims to identify how these strategies work and whether the S.A.F.E. Firearm program results in reduced unauthorized access to firearms by young people. The investigators hypothesize that a greater proportion of well-visits will have S.A.F.E. Firearm delivery documented in the electronic health record in Nudge+ clinics vs. Nudge clinics.

Clinical Trial Description

The investigators will conduct a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial using a longitudinal cluster randomized design to test the most effective way to implement S.A.F.E. Firearm among 30 clinics, 158 clinicians, and 48,475 youth nested in two Mental Health Research Network (MHRN) health systems in Michigan and Colorado. Clinics will be randomized to receive either the EHR implementation strategy (Nudge) or the EHR implementation strategy plus 1 year of facilitation to target implementation barriers (Nudge+).

Aim 1: Examine the effects of Nudge vs. Nudge+ on implementation outcomes.

• Reach: The investigators hypothesize that clinician-documented program delivery in the EHR (reach; primary outcome) will be superior in the Nudge+ condition compared to Nudge in the active and sustainment periods.

• Fidelity: The investigators hypothesize that parent-reported clinician fidelity to the program will be superior in the Nudge+ condition compared to Nudge in the active and sustainment periods.

• Cost: The investigators will also assess implementation strategy cost.

• Cable Locks/Acceptability: The investigators hypothesize that the Nudge+ condition will result in increased rates of cable lock distribution and higher acceptability compared with Nudge in both the active and sustainment periods.

Aim 2: Use mixed methods to identify implementation strategy mechanisms. The investigators hypothesize that Nudge+ will have a stronger effect because it will improve clinic adaptive reserve (i.e., the ability to make and sustain change). The investigators will also investigate the role of clinician motivation. The investigators hypothesize that clinician attitudes towards firearm counseling, clinician burnout, and clinician demographics will moderate implementation strategy effectiveness.

Aim 3: Examine the effects of the adapted intervention on clinical outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that Nudge+ will result in a greater proportion of parents reporting that they made firearm(s) less accessible to their child(ren) compared with Nudge. The investigators will explore rates of youth suicide attempts, deaths, and unintentional firearm injury and mortality by implementation condition and across time. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Suicide
• Suicide Prevention

• NCT number: NCT04844021
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Northwestern University
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 14, 2022
• Completion date: May 8, 2024