Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Enrolling by invitation
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04829682 |
Other study ID # |
D3547-R |
Secondary ID |
RX003547 |
Status |
Enrolling by invitation |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
March 31, 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2023 |
Source |
VA Office of Research and Development |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Psychiatric hospitalization is a critical opportunity to provide treatment to reduce the risk
of suicide and lay the groundwork for functional recovery. In fact, the period following
psychiatric hospitalization presents the greatest risk of death by suicide for Veterans.
Despite psychiatric hospitalization being a vital time for intervention, there are no
suicide-specific evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) that can be feasibly delivered during
a typical VHA inpatient stay. Importantly, suicide-specific inpatient interventions are
primarily focused on reducing the reoccurrence of suicidal behavior and have limited or no
focus on directly targeting other aspects of functional recovery. Preventing suicide during a
crisis is only a short-term solution if we fail to assist patients in building a life they
deem worth living.
The investigators' research over the past several years has been focused on addressing this
gap and overcoming barriers to implementing psychosocial interventions in an inpatient
setting. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a psychosocial intervention well suited
to both preventing suicide and enhancing functioning, but the investigators were not aware of
any ACT-based treatment protocols designed to specifically target suicide risk. The
investigators consulted with leading ACT clinicians and researchers to develop and manualize
"ACT for Life", a brief, transdiagnostic, recovery-oriented, inpatient, intervention for
Veterans hospitalized due to suicide risk. The individual intervention involves 3 to 6
inpatient sessions and 1 to 4 outpatient sessions focused on skills generalization and
treatment engagement. The investigators conducted a randomized controlled pilot study
evaluating the acceptability of ACT for Life and the feasibility of the planned design for
the proposed randomized controlled efficacy trial. Results of this rigorous pilot study
support the acceptability and feasibility of ACT for Life. Nearly all Veterans reported that
they believed they benefitted from ACT for Life. Preliminary outcomes suggest that ACT for
Life may improve functioning and reduce suicidal behavior following hospitalization due to
suicide risk. However, a full-scale clinical trial will be necessary to definitively evaluate
the efficacy of ACT for Life. To accomplish this goal, the investigators are proposing to
conduct a randomized controlled trial of ACT for Life versus Present Centered Therapy in 278
Veterans hospitalized for suicide risk to examine outcomes of suicidal behavior and changes
in functioning over a one-year period following psychiatric hospitalization. The specific
aims of this study are to determine the efficacy of ACT for Life for preventing suicidal
behavior and maximizing functional recovery, and to examine candidate ACT for Life treatment
mechanisms. Participants will complete assessments prior to treatment, before discharge from
the inpatient unit, and at one-, three-, six-, and twelve-months following discharge. The
proposed randomized controlled trial of ACT for Life has the potential to fill the VHA's need
for empirically-supported inpatient interventions that can be delivered during a typical
inpatient stay, are recovery oriented, and prevent future suicidal behavior.
Description:
Veterans are most likely to die by suicide in the week following discharge from acute
psychiatric care. Brief, recovery-oriented, empirically-supported, inpatient interventions
are needed given the unfortunate reality that Veterans at the greatest risk for suicide may
not follow up with outpatient treatment. To effectively intervene on the many pathways to
suicide, VHA will need to utilize brief inpatient psychosocial treatments that are
suicide-specific and transdiagnostic. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an
evidence-based treatment approach ideally suited for utilization among Veterans at high risk
for suicide because it simultaneously targets processes to reduce risk (e.g., distress
tolerance) and to increase protective factors (e.g., engage patients in building a life they
value). The ACT clinician does not focus on symptom reduction, but instead directly targets
functional recovery by assisting patients in identifying and engaging in values-consistent
behaviors even in the presence of aversive thoughts, emotions, or sensations. Furthermore,
ACT is suitable for extremely brief interventions. ACT clinicians employ experiential
exercises and metaphors that facilitate rapid new learning, and overcome many of the
limitations of more verbally intensive, didactic approaches to therapy. Research studies in
non-Veteran-specific populations indicate that as few as three ACT contact hours are
associated with approximately 50% reductions in rehospitalization among patients with
psychosis. The extant literature and qualities inherent to ACT strongly suggest that ACT
could be effective for improving the functioning of Veterans at risk of suicide and in-turn
preventing suicidal behavior; but these assumptions have yet to be empirically tested. To
address this gap and overcome barriers to delivering targeted psychological interventions for
suicide in a psychiatric inpatient setting, the investigators have developed and manualized a
brief, transdiagnostic, recovery-oriented, suicide-specific, ACT intervention for Veterans
hospitalized due to suicide risk, "ACT for Life". With the support of a Rehabilitation
Research and Development (RR&D) Small Projects in Rehabilitation Research (SPiRE) grant the
investigators conducted a randomized controlled acceptability and feasibility trial (N = 70),
which demonstrated the acceptability of ACT for Life to Veterans hospitalized due to suicide
risk. Data also support the feasibility of the proposed design for a full-scale randomized
controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of ACT for Life for maximizing functioning after a
suicidal crisis and preventing future suicidal behavior. Using a multisite, two arm,
randomized controlled design (ACT for Life + Treatment as Usual [ACT] vs. Present Centered
Therapy + Treatment as Usual [PCT]) with 278 participants, and assessments at pre-treatment,
pre-inpatient-discharge, and one-, three-, six-, and 12-months post-inpatient-discharge, the
investigators will:
Primary Aim: Determine the efficacy of ACT for Life for preventing suicidal behavior and
maximizing functional recovery. Primary Hypothesis 1 is that ACT participants will be
significantly less likely to engage in suicidal behavior (i.e., suicide or actual, aborted,
or interrupted suicide attempts as assessed by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale and
medical record review) compared to PCT participants during the 12-months following
psychiatric hospitalization. Primary Hypothesis 2 is that ACT participants will report
significantly greater improvements in functioning on the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45)
compared to PCT participants at one-month post-discharge from psychiatric hospitalization.
Secondary Aims will examine onset and maintenance of treatment gains. Secondary Aim 1:
Determine the efficacy of ACT for Life for preventing suicidal behavior at three- and six
-months following discharge from psychiatric inpatient care. Secondary Hypotheses 1a and 1b
are that ACT participants will be significantly less likely to have engaged in suicidal
behavior compared to PCT participants at (a) three- and (b) six-months following discharge
from psychiatric inpatient care. Secondary Aim 2: Determine the efficacy of ACT for Life for
improving functioning at three-, six-, and 12-months following discharge from psychiatric
inpatient care. Secondary Hypothesis 2a, 2b, and 2c are that compared to PCT participants,
ACT participants will report significantly greater improvements in functioning relative to
pre-treatment on the OQ-45 (a) three-, (b) six-, and (c) 12-months following discharge from
psychiatric inpatient care.
Exploratory Aim: Examine candidate ACT for Life treatment mechanisms. Exploratory Hypotheses
1 and 2 are that ACT participants will show (1) greater increases from pre-treatment in
psychological flexibility than PCT participants and that (2) compared to PCT participants, a
greater proportion of ACT participants will engage in outpatient mental health treatment in
the month following discharge from inpatient care.
The proposed RCT of ACT for Life has the potential to fill VHA's critical need for
evidence-based psychotherapies that can be delivered during a typical inpatient stay, are
recovery oriented, and prevent future suicidal behavior.