Brief Strategic Family Therapy for Adolescent Drug Abusers

Substance Abuse Clinical Trial

— BSFT  

Official title:

Brief Strategic Family Therapy for Adolescent Drug Abusers

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00095303
• Other study ID #: 20090698
• Secondary ID: U10DA0137205RC2D
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: November 2, 2004
• Last updated: June 10, 2015
• Start date: August 2004
• Est. completion date: August 2011

Study information

• Verified date: June 2015
• Source: University of Miami
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Federal Government
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) for Adolescent Drug Abusers to treatment as usual (TAU).

An additional follow up assessment, funded by an American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) grant, was completed 5 years post randomization in order to examine the long term effects of outpatient treatments for illicit drug using adolescents.

Description:

Adolescent drug abuse continues to be one of the most pressing public health issues in the United States—our nation's teenagers continue to use illicit drugs at a worrisome rate. Broad reviews of the treatment outcome literature indicate that family interventions in general, and Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) in particular, are effective with drug using youth. This study is designed to compare BSFT to treatment as usual (TAU). The researchers believe that BSFT will be much more effective than TAU in reducing adolescent drug use. They will also examine which of these treatment approaches does a better job of engaging adolescents and family members in treatment, decreasing problem behaviors, decreasing sexually risky behaviors, increasing pro-social activities (e.g., school, work), and improving the functioning of the family.

With the addition of the extended follow up, we have the opportunity to examine the sustainability of study outcomes into early adulthood, filling a gap in the treatment research literature about the long-term effects of adolescent substance abuse treatment. The follow up study examined the long term effectiveness of BSFT compared to TAU in the rates of substance use, number of arrests and externalizing behaviors, in youth who received study treatments at the time when they were adolescents.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 480
• Est. completion date: August 2011
• Est. primary completion date: January 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 12 Years to 17 Years

Eligibility

Main Study:

Inclusion Criteria:

• adolescents ages 12 to 17

• used any illicit drugs (other than alcohol and tobacco) in the 30-day period

• live with or intend to live with a formal or informal family

Exclusion Criteria:

• suicidal or homicidal ideation.

Follow Up Study:

Inclusion Criteria:

• youth must have signed consent during the main study to be approached for future research

• currently 18 years old or older

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Substance Abuse

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT)
BSFT is a family therapy approach that consists of 12 to 16 sessions (each 1 to 1.5 hours long) over a 4-month period during the Main Study, and up to 8 "booster" sessions. Interventions are delivered to adolescents and relevant family members in non-restrictive community settings (e.g., clinics, homes, school).
• Treatment as Usual
TAU varies depending on site, however each will offer services that include at least 1 therapy session (individual or group therapy) per week during the Main Study, as well as participation in ancillary services (e.g., case management, self help groups, etc.) over a four month period.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Puerto Rico	Centro de Salud Mental de la Comunidad de Bayamsn	Bayamon
United States	The Crossroads Center	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	Daymark	Concord	North Carolina
United States	Gateway Community Services	Jacksonville	Florida
United States	The Villiage	Miami	Florida
United States	Tarzana Treatment Center	Tarzana	California
United States	Arapahoe House	Thornton	Colorado
United States	La Frontera Center	Tucson	Arizona

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Miami	National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Oregon Research Institute

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Puerto Rico, 

References & Publications (6)

Horigian VE, Robbins MS, Dominguez R, Ucha J, Rosa CL. Principles for defining adverse events in behavioral intervention research: lessons from a family-focused adolescent drug abuse trial. Clin Trials. 2010 Feb;7(1):58-68. doi: 10.1177/1740774509356575. — View Citation

Robbins MS, Alonso E, Horigian VE, Bachrach K, Burlew K, Carrión IS, Hodgkins CC, Miller M, Schindler E, VanDeMark N, Henderson C, Szapocznik J. Transporting clinical research to community settings: designing and conducting a multisite trial of brief strategic family therapy. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;5(2):54-61. — View Citation

Robbins MS, Feaster DJ, Horigian VE, Puccinelli MJ, Henderson C, Szapocznik J. Therapist adherence in brief strategic family therapy for adolescent drug abusers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;79(1):43-53. doi: 10.1037/a0022146. — View Citation

Robbins MS, Feaster DJ, Horigian VE, Rohrbaugh M, Shoham V, Bachrach K, Miller M, Burlew KA, Hodgkins C, Carrion I, Vandermark N, Schindler E, Werstlein R, Szapocznik J. Brief strategic family therapy versus treatment as usual: results of a multisite rand — View Citation

Robbins MS, Szapocznik J, Horigian VE, Feaster DJ, Puccinelli M, Jacobs P, Burlew K, Werstlein R, Bachrach K, Brigham G. Brief strategic family therapy for adolescent drug abusers: a multi-site effectiveness study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 May;30(3):269- — View Citation

Weems CF, Feaster DJ, Horigian VE, Robbins MS. Parent and child agreement on anxiety disorder symptoms using the DISC predictive scales. Assessment. 2011 Jun;18(2):213-6. doi: 10.1177/1073191110389278. Epub 2010 Nov 12. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from 28 days prior to baseline	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 1-28	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days in days 29-56	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 57-84	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 85-112	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 113-140	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 141 - 168	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 169-196	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 197-224	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 225-252	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 253-280	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use from days 281-308	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 309-336	No
Primary	Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.	Number of self reported drug use days from day 337-364	No
Primary	Follow Up Study, Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. For the Follow Up Study, the TLFB was used to identify drug use in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use over the past 90 days. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use.The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 90 days.	Number of self reported drug use days 90 days prior assessment	No
Primary	Follow Up Study, Drug Use	Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. For the Follow Up Study, the TLFB was used to identify drug use in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use over the past 90 days. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use.The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 90 days.	Number of self reported drug use days 90 days prior to assessment	No
Secondary	Main Study, Externalizing Behaviors at Baseline	For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.0. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.	Baseline	No
Secondary	Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 4 Months Post Randomization	For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.8. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.	4 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 8 Months Post Randomization	For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.5. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.	8 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 12 Months Post Randomization	For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.4. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.	12 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Follow Up Study, Externalizing Behavior	For the follow up study, externalizing behavior for the 90 days prior to the follow up was assessed using the externalizing composite of the Adult Self Report (ASR). The ASR is a 123 item self report scale designed for 18 to 59 year-old to describe their own functioning. Items are on a 3 point likert type scale (0= not true, 1=somewhat true, 2=very true or often true). The externalizing scale is comprised by the aggressive, rule braking and intrusive syndromes. The problem syndromes have been normed by sex and age (18 to 35, or 36 to 59), using a nationally representative sample. Scores were square-root transformed to more closely approximate a normal distribution. Scores ranged from 0 to 7.2. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior. Participants were also asked to self report arrests in the past year . Externalizing was analyzed using regression	90 days prior to assessment	No
Secondary	Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at Baseline	The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline. Scores ranged from -3.0 to 1.8. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.	Baseline	No
Secondary	Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 4 Months Post Randomization	The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline. Scores ranged from -2.9 to 1.8. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.	4 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 8 Months Post Randomization	The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline.Scores ranged from -2.8 to 2.0. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.	8 months post randomization	Yes
Secondary	Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 12 Months Post Randomization	The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline.Scores ranged from -2.6 to 2.0. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.	12 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Follow Up Study, Level of Family Functioning	For the follow up study, family functioning was measured by a composite of the Cohesion and Conflict scales of the Family Environment Scale. Scores ranged from 1.0 to 18.0. The higher the value, the better the level of family functioning outcome.	90 days prior assessment	No
Secondary	Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at Baseline	For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 8.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.	Baseline	No
Secondary	Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 4 Months Post Randomization	For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 10.4. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.	4 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 8 Months Post Randomization	For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 6.8. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.	8 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 12 Months Post Randomization	For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 6.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.	12 months post randomization	No
Secondary	Follow Up Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors	For the Follow Up Study, sexual risk behavior was measured by examining the number of unprotected sexual acts and the number of partners and number of sex acts that included substance use the in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment; a latent factor using structural equation modeling will be used created from the Behavioral Risk Assessment. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 11.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.	90 days prior assessment	No