Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02547571
Other study ID # V2015-001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date March 2016
Est. completion date September 2018

Study information

Verified date September 2018
Source McGill University Health Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare diet, type of bowel preparation and time of colonoscopy to determine if one method is better than the other and, if they are the same, identify the one which is the most convenient for the patients.


Description:

The objective of the current proposed trial is thus to compare the cleanliness achieved with PEG high-volume (2L+2L) split-dose versus PEG (1L+1L)+Bisacodyl low-volume split-dose, or PEG high volume (4L) non-split day before versus PEG low volume (2L) non-split same day preparation, according to time of endoscopy (early or later), as well as assess the role of diet (low residue or clear liquid diet) according to these different Canadian outpatient preparation regimens.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 3476
Est. completion date September 2018
Est. primary completion date September 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Outpatients

- 18 years or older

- Able to comprehend the trial

- Have an indication for full colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects are excluded from enrollment into the study if any of the following are present:

General exclusion criteria:

- Subject refusal

- Previous bowel preparation in the last 14 days

- Pregnancy or breastfeeding

- Reduced mobility

Medical/Endoscopic exclusion criteria:

- Suspected or diagnosed with bowel obstruction

- Any colonic surgery

- Toxic megacolon

- Ileus

- Ischemic colitis

- Decompensated heart failure

- Severe acute renal failure

- Severe liver disease

- Severe electrolyte imbalance

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
High volume PEG split-dose
Colyte® or PegLyte® will be provided to the subject who will be asked to drink 2L of the preparation starting at 7:00 PM the day before the procedure at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until completed. The second dose of 2L of preparation will be taken the morning of the colonoscopy starting 4-5 hours prior to the planned procedural time at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until completed.
Low volume PEG split-dose
Bi-PegLyte® will be provided to the subject who will be asked to ingest 3 tabs of Bisacodyl 5 mg (total 15 mg) at 2:00 PM the day before the procedure. After the first bowel movement, or if there is no bowel movement within 6 hours of taking the Bisacodyl tablets, the subject will be asked to drink 1L of the solution at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until the solution is completed. The second dose of 1L of preparation will be taken the morning of the colonoscopy starting 4-5 hours prior to the procedure at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes. Use of antacids will not be permitted within one hour of taking bisacodyl.
High volume PEG non split, day before
Colyte® or PegLyte® will be provided to the subject who will be asked to drink 4L of preparation starting at 6:00 PM the day before the procedure, at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until completed.
Low volume PEG non split, same day
Bi-PegLyte® will be provided to the subject, who will be asked to ingest 3 tabs of Bisacodyl 5 mg (total 15 mg) at 2:00 PM the day before the procedure and will drink 2L of preparation the morning of the colonoscopy starting 4 hours prior to the procedure at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes, until completed. Use of antacids will not be permitted within one hour of taking Bisacodyl.
Other:
Clear liquid diet

Low residue diet

Early colonoscopy (stratified)
"Early" appointments: 7:30 AM to 10h30 AM
Later colonoscopy (stratified)
"Later" appointments: 10:30 AM to 4:30 PM.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Forzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre Calgary Alberta
Canada University of Alberta Hospital Edmonton Alberta
Canada QEII HSC Halifax Nova Scotia
Canada Western University London Ontario
Canada CHUM Montreal Quebec
Canada McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec
Canada The Ottawa Hospital Ottawa Ontario
Canada Hôpital St-Sacrement, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Québec
Canada St. Paul's Hospital Vancouver British Columbia
Canada Health Sciences center and St. Boniface Hospital Winnipeg Manitoba

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Alan Barkun Pendopharm

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (45)

Assal C, Watson PY. Angioedema as a hypersensitivity reaction to polyethylene glycol oral electrolyte solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Aug;64(2):294-5. Epub 2006 May 19. — View Citation

Brahmania M, Ou G, Bressler B, Ko HK, Lam E, Telford J, Enns R. 2 L versus 4 L of PEG3350 + electrolytes for outpatient colonic preparation: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):408-416.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.035. Ep — View Citation

Bucci C, Rotondano G, Hassan C, Rea M, Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Ciacci C, Marmo R. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):566-576.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie — View Citation

Cesaro P, Hassan C, Spada C, Petruzziello L, Vitale G, Costamagna G. A new low-volume isosmotic polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl versus split-dose 4 L polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. — View Citation

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. — View Citation

Chorev N, Chadad B, Segal N, Shemesh I, Mor M, Plaut S, Fraser G, Geller A, Gal E, Niv Y. Preparation for colonoscopy in hospitalized patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Mar;52(3):835-9. — View Citation

Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 201 — View Citation

de Leone A, Tamayo D, Fiori G, Ravizza D, Trovato C, De Roberto G, Fazzini L, Dal Fante M, Crosta C. Same-day 2-L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl vs split 4-L PEG: Bowel cleansing for late-morning colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep — View Citation

El Sayed AM, Kanafani ZA, Mourad FH, Soweid AM, Barada KA, Adorian CS, Nasreddine WA, Sharara AI. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Ju — View Citation

Eun CS, Han DS, Hyun YS, Bae JH, Park HS, Kim TY, Jeon YC, Sohn JH. The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Feb;56(2):539-44. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010 — View Citation

Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2 — View Citation

Hangartner PJ, Münch R, Meier J, Ammann R, Bühler H. Comparison of three colon cleansing methods: evaluation of a randomized clinical trial with 300 ambulatory patients. Endoscopy. 1989 Nov;21(6):272-5. — View Citation

Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76-9. — View Citation

Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, Benamouzig R, Holme O, Green S, Kuiper T, Marmo R, Omar M, Petruzziello L, Spada C, Zullo A, Dumonceau JM; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Bowel preparation for col — View Citation

Hendry PO, Jenkins JT, Diament RH. The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;9(8):745-8. Epub 2007 Mar 7. — View Citation

Jayanthi V, Ramathilakam B, Malathi S, Dinakaran N, Balasubramanian V. Comparison of polyethylene glycol versus combination of magnesium sulphate and bisacodyl for colon preparation. Trop Gastroenterol. 2000 Jan-Mar;21(1):18-9. — View Citation

Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, Rex DK; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommen — View Citation

Jung YS, Seok HS, Park DI, Song CS, Kim SE, Lee SH, Eun CS, Han DS, Kim YS, Lee CK. A clear liquid diet is not mandatory for polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in healthy outpatients. Gut Liver. 2013 Nov;7(6):681-7. doi: — View Citation

Khan MA, Piotrowski Z, Brown MD. Patient acceptance, convenience, and efficacy of single-dose versus split-dose colonoscopy bowel preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr;44(4):310-1. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181c2c92a. — View Citation

Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Oct;20(4):659-71. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.005. Review. — View Citation

Lawrance IC, Willert RP, Murray K. A validated bowel-preparation tolerability questionnaire and assessment of three commonly used bowel-cleansing agents. Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Apr;58(4):926-35. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2449-0. Epub 2012 Oct 25. — View Citation

Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1480-91. Review. Erratum in: Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):688. — View Citation

Manno M, Pigò F, Manta R, Barbera C, Bertani H, Mirante VG, Dabizzi E, Caruso A, Olivetti G, Hassan C, Zullo A, Conigliaro R. Bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution: optimizing the splitting regimen. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Jul;44(7): — View Citation

Marmo R, Rotondano G, Riccio G, Marone A, Bianco MA, Stroppa I, Caruso A, Pandolfo N, Sansone S, Gregorio E, D'Alvano G, Procaccio N, Capo P, Marmo C, Cipolletta L. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus no — View Citation

Martel M, Barkun AN, Menard C, Restellini S, Kherad O, Vanasse A. Split-Dose Preparations Are Superior to Day-Before Bowel Cleansing Regimens: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):79-88. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 8. — View Citation

Matro R, Shnitser A, Spodik M, Daskalakis C, Katz L, Murtha A, Kastenberg D. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenter — View Citation

Parente F, Marino B, Crosta C. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: a practical approach. Dig Liver Dis. 2009 Feb;41(2):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Jul 26. Review. — View Citation

Park DI, Park SH, Lee SK, Baek YH, Han DS, Eun CS, Kim WH, Byeon JS, Yang SK. Efficacy of prepackaged, low residual test meals with 4L polyethylene glycol versus a clear liquid diet with 4L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation: a randomized trial. J Gast — View Citation

Park SS, Sinn DH, Kim YH, Lim YJ, Sun Y, Lee JH, Kim JY, Chang DK, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Rhee JC, Kim JJ. Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel p — View Citation

Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A, Grosso B, Jimenez A, Ortega J, Quintero E. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: — View Citation

Rabeneck L, Saskin R, Paszat LF. Onset and clinical course of bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.034. Epub 2010 Dec 31. — View Citation

Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, Church J, Marshall JB, Riddell RH; U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continu — View Citation

Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;97(7):1696-700. — View Citation

Schuman E, Balsam PE. Probable anaphylactic reaction to polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):411. — View Citation

Scott SR, Raymond PL, Thompson WO, Galt DJ. Efficacy and tolerance of sodium phosphates oral solution after diet liberalization. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;28(2):133-9. — View Citation

Seo EH, Kim TO, Park MJ, Heo NY, Park J, Yang SY. Low-volume morning-only polyethylene glycol with specially designed test meals versus standard-volume split-dose polyethylene glycol with standard diet for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Dig — View Citation

Shah S, Prematta T, Adkinson NF, Ishmael FT. Hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;53(3):352-5. doi: 10.1177/0091270012447122. Epub 2013 Jan 24. — View Citation

Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD, Lieberman DA, de Garmo P, Fleischer DE. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jul;66(1):27-34. — View Citation

Siddique S, Lopez KT, Hinds AM, Ahmad DS, Nguyen DL, Matteson-Kome ML, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Miralax with gatorade for bowel preparation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;109(10):1566-74. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014. — View Citation

Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ, Cryer B, Davila R, Cipher D, Harford WV. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6 — View Citation

Soweid AM, Kobeissy AA, Jamali FR, El-Tarchichi M, Skoury A, Abdul-Baki H, El-Zahabi L, El-Sayyed A, Barada KA, Sharara AI, Mourad F, Arabi A. A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte sol — View Citation

Stollman N, Manten HD. Angioedema from oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Aug;44(2):209-10. — View Citation

Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, Fanelli RD, Hyman N, Shen B, Wasco KE; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. A consensus document on bowe — View Citation

Wu KL, Rayner CK, Chuah SK, Chiu KW, Lu CC, Chiu YC. Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):107-12. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb1e52. — View Citation

Xie Q, Chen L, Zhao F, Zhou X, Huang P, Zhang L, Zhou D, Wei J, Wang W, Zheng S. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution as bowel preparations — View Citation

* Note: There are 45 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Bowel cleansing according to the Boston Scale Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Subject willingness to repeat the preparation (survey) Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Withdrawal time and total procedural time Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Cecal or ileal intubation rate for colonoscopies Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Polyp detection and polypectomy rate Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Right colon polyp detection rate Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Specific lesional rates identified according to pathology up to 30 days
Secondary % of preparation taken by the subject Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Subject travel time to endoscopy unit (hrs) Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Incontinence Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Fecal Immunochemical Test value Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Montreal score compared to BBPS Day of colonoscopy
Secondary Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scores compared to BBPS Day of colonoscopy