Stuttering, Adult Clinical Trial
— TDCSOfficial title:
An Investigation of the Effect of 5 Consecutive Days of Bihemispheric TDCS on Speech Fluency in Individuals With Stuttering
It will be determined whether bihemispheric stimulation (anodal to the left IFG and cathodal to the right IFG) is used with fluency-facilitating conditions for 5 consecutive days in individuals with stuttering and whether there is a difference in terms of the effects seen in speech fluency compared to the sham condition.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 36 |
Est. completion date | September 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - developmental stuttering - age between 18 and 60 years - right hand dominant Exclusion Criteria: - history of seizures, head trauma, hearing problems, cochlear implant, intracranial metal implantation, medications that affects the central nervous system, implanted neurostimulators, cardiac pacemakers, or medication infusion devices - any speech and language disorder other than developmental stuttering - neurological or psychiatric disorders, brain surgery, tumours, neurodevelopmental disorders, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Biruni University | Istanbul | Zeytinburnu |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Biruni University |
Turkey,
Chesters J, Mottonen R, Watkins KE. Transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech fluency in adults who stutter. Brain. 2018 Apr 1;141(4):1161-1171. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy011. — View Citation
Garnett EO, Chow HM, Choo AL, Chang SE. Stuttering Severity Modulates Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Adults Who Stutter. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Nov 21;13:411. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00411. eCollection 2019. — View Citation
Yada Y, Tomisato S, Hashimoto RI. Online cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the right homologue of Broca's area improves speech fluency in people who stutter. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Feb;73(2):63-69. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12796. Epub 2018 Dec 11. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Disfluent syllables | change in % disfluent syllables from baseline | immediately before and immediately after the stimulation on each day of the 5-day intervention, and at 1 week after the end of the intervention. | |
Secondary | Stuttering Severity Instrument- Fourth Edition (SSI-IV) score | It measures stuttering severity in the following four areas of speech behavior: (1) frequency, (2) duration, (3) physical concomitants, and (4) naturalness of the individual's speech. Frequency is expressed in percent syllables stuttered and converted to scale scores of 2-18. Duration is timed to the nearest one tenth of a second and converted to scale scores of 2-18. The four types of Physical Concomitants (Distracting Sounds, Facial Grimaces, Head Movements, and Movements of the Extremities) are converted to scale scores of 0-20. Naturalness is ranked on a scale from 1 (Highly Natural Sound Speech) to 9 (Highly Unnatural Sound Speech). Overall naturalness is ranked at the discretion of the clinician. Scaled scores of Frequency, Duration, and Physical Concomitants are added together to derive a Total Score, Percentile Rank, and Severity Equivalent. | immediately before and immediately after the stimulation on each day of the 5-day intervention, and at 1 week after the end of the intervention. | |
Secondary | The Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES) score | The instrument, which requires approximately 20 min to complete, is organized into four sections: (a) General Information, (b) Reactions to Stuttering, (c) Communication in Daily Situations, and (d) Quality of Life. OASES consists of 100 items, each scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. For each item on the OASES, response scales are that higher scores indicate a greater degree of negative impact associated with stuttering and lower scores indicate less negative impact. All impact scores range from a minimum score of 20 (if the speaker answers 1 for every item within a section) up to a maximum of 100 (if the speaker answers 5 for every item within the section). | baseline, after the 5-day stimulation and at the 1-week post-intervention time point |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02909088 -
Efficacy and Tolerability of Ecopipam in Adults With Childhood Onset Fluency Disorder (Stuttering).
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06422442 -
Information Processing Biases in Adults Who Stutter
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06059729 -
Effects of Al-Lisaan Urdu Digital Software for Self-Assessment and Treatment of Adult Stutters
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05472181 -
The Effects of Brain Stimulation on Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06011837 -
Effects of Altered Auditory Feedback on Speech Fluency
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05339906 -
Study of the Effect of the Auditory Stimulation on Stuttering Symptoms in Patients With a Deficit of Spectral Power in the EEG Beta Frequency Band
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05908123 -
Exploring the Nature, Assessment and Treatment of Stuttering
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05574803 -
High-definition tDCS Treatment for Cantonese-speaking Adults Who Stutter
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04929184 -
Speech Processing in Stuttering
|
N/A |