Stroke — Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia
Citation(s)
Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):987-93. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0. Epub 2003 Mar 20.
Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
Doron R, Lotan D, Versano Z, Benatav L, Franko M, Armoza S, Kately N, Rehavi M Escitalopram or novel herbal mixture treatments during or following exposure to stress reduce anxiety-like behavior through corticosterone and BDNF modifications. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 1;9(4):e91455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091455. eCollection 2014.
Enderby P, Broeckx J, Hospers W, Schildermans F, Deberdt W Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994 Aug;17(4):320-31. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199408000-00003.
FOCUS Trial Collaboration Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jan 19;393(10168):265-274. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32823-X. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Gu SC, Wang CD Early Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Recovery after Stroke: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 May;27(5):1178-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.11.031. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
Hillis AE, Tippett DC Stroke Recovery: Surprising Influences and Residual Consequences. Adv Med. 2014;2014:378263. doi: 10.1155/2014/378263.
Hillis AE The 'standard' for poststroke aphasia recovery. Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1316-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585364. Epub 2010 Jun 10. No abstract available.
Huber W, Willmes K, Poeck K, Van Vleymen B, Deberdt W Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Mar;78(3):245-50. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90028-9.
Kurland J, Pulvermuller F, Silva N, Burke K, Andrianopoulos M Constrained versus unconstrained intensive language therapy in two individuals with chronic, moderate-to-severe aphasia and apraxia of speech: behavioral and fMRI outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S65-87. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0113). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Lam RW Antidepressants and QTc prolongation. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013 Mar;38(2):E5-6. doi: 10.1503/jpn.120256. No abstract available.
Saeterdal I, Pike E, Ringerike T, Gjertsen MK Efficacy and Safety for the Newer Antidepressants in Adults [Internet]. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2007 Jun. Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 17-2007. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK464856/
Sanchez C, Reines EH, Montgomery SA A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike? Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;29(4):185-96. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000023.
Wang C, Zhang Y, Liu B, Long H, Yu C, Jiang T Dosage effects of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on cortical surface area and functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 12;34(7):2645-51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3501-13.2014.
Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA)
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.