Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01859741
Other study ID # 59R5-003
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 1/Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date January 7, 2012
Est. completion date May 8, 2017

Study information

Verified date September 2020
Source Mereo BioPharma
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study consists of a Phase1b lead-in portion to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OMP-59R5 (tarextumab) in combination with etoposide (EP) for 6 cycles followed a Phase 2, multi center, randomized, placebo-controlled portion comparing the efficacy and safety of OMP-59R5 in combination with EP for 6 cycles followed by single agent OMP-59R5 relative to EP alone for 6 cycles in subjects receiving first-line therapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.


Description:

The Phase 1b lead-in portion of the study was conducted to determine the MTD of OMP-59R5 administered along with EP. The Phase 2 portion of the study was multi-center, randomized, and placebo-controlled. Subjects who qualified for enrollment into the Phase 2 portion of the study were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive study treatment of tarextumab along with EP (Arm A) or placebo along with EP (Arm B).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 172
Est. completion date May 8, 2017
Est. primary completion date April 18, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for the study:

1. Histologically or cytologically documented extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

2. Adults of 18 years of age or older.

3. Performance Status (ECOG) of 0 or 1.

4. Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue.

5. Adequate organ function:

1. Adequate hematologic function (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] = 1,500 cells/µL; hemoglobin = 9 g/dL, platelets = 100,000/µL).

2. Adequate renal function (serum creatinine = 1.5 mg/dL or calculated creatinine clearance = 60 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault formula).

3. Adequate hepatic function (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] = 3 x upper limit of normal [ULN], ALT may be = 5 x ULN if due to liver metastases but cannot be associated with concurrent elevated bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) unless it is approved by the Sponsor's Medical Monitor).

4. Prothrombin Time (PT)/International Normalized Ration (INR) =1.5 × ULN, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) =1.5 × ULN.

6. Written consent on an Institutional Review Board (IRB)/IndependentEthics Committee (IEC)-approved Informed Consent Form prior to any study-specific evaluation.

7. For women of child-bearing potential, negative serum pregnancy test at screening and use of physician-approved method of birth control from 30 days prior to the first study drug administration to 30 days following the last study drug administration or the last EP in the study, whichever is discontinued last.

8. Male subjects must be surgically sterile or must agree to use physician-approved contraception during the study and for 30 days following the last study drug administration or the last EP in the study, whichever is discontinued last.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible for participation in the study:

1. Limited stage small cell lung cancer appropriate for radical treatment with chemoradiation.

2. Prior therapy including radiation, chemotherapy or surgery for newly diagnosed extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

3. Presence of any serious or uncontrolled illness including, but not limited to: ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled arterial thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, and psychiatric illness that would limit compliance with study requirement.

4. History of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndromes (including unstable angina), coronary angioplasty and/or stenting within 6 months prior to the first administration of study drug.

5. A history of malignancy with the exception of:

1. Adequately treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ cervical cancer

2. Adequately treated stage I cancer from which the subject is currently in remission, or

3. Any other cancer from which the subject has been disease-free for = 3 years

6. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

7. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

8. Concurrent use of therapeutic warfarin (prophylactic low dose of warfarin, i.e., 1 mg daily for port catheter is allowed)

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
OMP-59R5
OMP-59R5 administered intravenously
Etoposide
administered intravenously
Placebo
administered IV
Cisplatin or Carboplatin
administered intravenously

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Michigan Medical Center, Clinical Trials Office Ann Arbor Michigan
United States Georgia Cancer Specialists, PC Atlanta Georgia
United States Piedmont Cancer Institute Atlanta Georgia
United States Texas Oncology-South Austin Austin Texas
United States Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland
United States University of Maryland, Greenebaum Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland
United States Weinberg Cancer Institute Baltimore Maryland
United States Texas Oncology-Bedford Bedford Texas
United States Oncology and Hematology Associates of Southwest Virginia Inc. Blacksburg Virginia
United States Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo New York
United States Tennessee Oncology, PLLC Chattanooga Tennessee
United States Univeristy of Chicago Medical Center Chicago Illinois
United States Oncology Hematology Care, Inc. Cincinnati Ohio
United States Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio
United States Texas Oncology, P.A. Dallas Texas
United States Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers Denver Colorado
United States Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan
United States Virginia Cancer Specialists Fairfax Virginia
United States Sarah Cannon Fort Myers Florida
United States Greenville Health System, Clinical Research Unit, Institute for Translational Oncology Research Greenville South Carolina
United States The University of Texas MD A nderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
United States Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California
United States Norton Cancer Institute Louisville Kentucky
United States Minnesota Oncology Hematology , P.A. Minneapolis Minnesota
United States The Sarah Cannon Research Institute Nashville Tennessee
United States Yale University New Haven Connecticut
United States Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
United States Ocala Oncology Center, PL Ocala Florida
United States Oncology Hematology West PC, dba Nebraska Cancer Specialists Omaha Nebraska
United States UPMC Cancer Pavilion Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Providence Cancer Center Oncology and Hematology Care Eastside Portland Oregon
United States Highlands Oncology Group Rogers Arkansas
United States Cancer Care Network of South Texas San Antonio Texas
United States Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle Washington
United States Georgetown University Hospital Washington District of Columbia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Phase 1b: To Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of OMP-59R5 When Administered With Etoposide and Cisplatin or Carboplatin (Number of Subjects With DLTs) To determine the MTD of tarextumab when administered on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle along with etoposide 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2 and 3, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL•min on Day 1 in subjects with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer. DLT evaluable population includes all subjects who received at least 1 partial dose of OMP-59R5 during the Phase 1b dose escalation portion of the study including the carboplatin cohort and who had completed Day 21 cycle of 1 OMP-59R5 administration or had discontinued due to drug-related toxicity. Up to 1 year in absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
Primary Phase 1b: Overall Response (Response Evaluable Population) The best overall response is defined as the best Investigator-assessed response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression in the following order of importance: Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), Not Evaluable (NE). Response evaluable population includes subjects who received 1 partial dose of OMP-59R5 and at at least 1 post tumor assessment. Up to 1 year in absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
Primary Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (ITT Population) To determine the improvement in Progression Free Survival (PFS) resulting from the addition of tarextumab to etoposide and platinum therapy (EP) in subjects receiving first-line therapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer. PFS is based on the Investigator-assessments of tumor response which is defined as the number of days from randomization until death or disease progression as defined by RECIST criteria for the ITT Population. Up to 1 year until disease progression or death.
Primary Phase 2: Best Overall Tumor Response Based on Investigator Assessment (ITT Population) The response rate is the number of subjects per treatment arm who have either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) for best overall response (according to RECIST criteria) divided by the number of subjects randomized to the respective arms. Up to 1 year in absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT03223155 - Concurrent or Sequential Immunotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04056247 - Predicting Responsiveness in Oncology Patients Based on Host Response Evaluation During Anti Cancer Treatments