View clinical trials related to Spinal Stenosis.
Filter by:Background : Segmental spinal instability after a laminectomy, and adjacent segment disease (ASD) at after an arthrodesis, are well-known concerns in spinal surgery, which may require re-interventions, usually by surgical arthrodesis, posing the problem of a new heavy intervention under general anesthesia, in often fragile patients. Trans-facet fixation (TFF) under local anesthesia and double fluoroscopic and CT guidance is a minimally invasive technique involving the placement of screws through the posterior facet joints, improving spinal stability. Purpose : The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy, in terms of pain reduction (VAS) and improvement of daily activities (ODI), of TFF under CT scan guidance in the context of low back pain and/or radiculalgia related to focal instability secondary to laminectomy or ASD. Methods : TFF were performed in 24 patients having a history of spinal surgery such as laminectomy and/or classic surgical arthrodesis and remaining symptomatic, at Nice University Hospital between 2017 and 2021 Pre- and postoperative pain and disability levels were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), collected prospectively at systematic 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits. Long term evolution were assessed by phone consultation.
This study is aim to disclose the effect of contrast media, which used in epidural steroid injections, on the parameters of thyroid function tests (TFTs). The patients who underwent an epidural steroid injection were included. The investigators hypothesized that contrast media owing to contain iodine may impair the values of TFTs.
Nocturnal calf cramps is a common complaint in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of baclofen in lumbar spinal stenosis patients receiving conservative therapy. We will compare pain score, insomnia severity, functional ability and patient satisfaction between control (conservative management for spinal stenosis) and baclofen group (conservative management for spinal stenosis plus baclofen treatment).
Rationale: Lumbar spine surgery is associated with high postoperative pain scores and analgesic use, despite use of multimodal analgesia. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising locoregional anesthetic technique for this type of surgery. The literature is not yet conclusive about the effectiveness of this technique on reducing postoperative pain intensity. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic effect of ESPB as add-on therapy to multimodal analgesia on early postoperative pain intensity after lumbar spinal fusion surgery compared to placebo. Study design: The study is designed as a prospective mono-centre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Study population: 76 patients ≥ 18 years of age requiring elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery involving one to four fusion levels. Intervention: Patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB with either ropivacaine or placebo at the end of surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is pain intensity upon emergence from anesthesia measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. A minimal clinically important difference is considered to be a decrease of 1.5 points. Secondary endpoints are pain intensity during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid use during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid side effects, use of anti-emetics, time to first opioid use/request, length of hospital stay, quality of recovery at discharge. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The Sint Maartenskliniek is experienced in applying locoregional analgesia, the use of ropivacaine and using sonography. The procedure of administering ESPB has a very low risk of complications. Receiving placebo is justifiable because this group will not be withhold standard treatment. The risks of receiving placebo are negligible. The patients will visit the clinic at regular follow-up moments.
This study aims to compare the outcomes of surgical treatment and conservative treatment at medium- and long-term period (minimum 2 years) in patients with lumbar stenosis who come to the observation of the PI's Team at the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, through a series exhaustive questionnaires to self-administer to patients in order to define a path of "decision-making" as effective as possible for the patient and the doctor.
Purpose To evaluate clinical and radiologic outcome of a series of patients treated with a removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer (IPS) (LobsterProject® Techlamed®) for symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Methods All patients treated in the two considered Centres with this IPS during 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with incomplete clinical or radiological documentation were not included. Procedures were performed under deep sedation or general anaesthesia by two interventional radiologists. Patients were clinically evaluated before intervention and at 3-month follow-up with Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and radiologically with MRI or CT scans. Neural foramina were independently measured for each patient on pre- and post-procedural CT scans by two radiologists.
The aim of the FUSE-ML study is to develop and externally validate a robust ML-based prediction tool based on multicenter data from a range of international centers that will provide individualized risk-benefit profiles tailored to each patient undergoing lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative disease. Data will be collected by a range of international centers.
The purpose of the this study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a fluoroscopically-guided dorsal ramus block placed by the operative neurosurgeon prior to lumbosacral surgery. The study will consist of a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who underwent lumbosacral surgery patients between June 2018 and March 2021 with or without a preoperative fluoroscopically-guided dorsal ramus (DR) block placed by the operative neurosurgeon.
The aim of the present study is to investigate the safety and clinical utility of contralateral oblique view for fluoroscopic guided cervical epidural access.
Introduction Lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition defined by an excessive deposition of adipose tissue in the lumbar spinal canal. The objective of this case report is to document a clinical case of SEL presenting within a multidisciplinary spine clinic and to compare our clinical findings and management with the current literature. Case presentation A 51-year-old female presented at a spine clinic with low back pain, bilateral leg pain and difficulty walking. MR imaging of the lumbar spine showed L4-L5 and L5-S1 degenerative disk disease with evidence of severe central canal stenosis due to extensive epidural lipomatosis. The patient was initially advised to lose weight, undergo a course of physiotherapy, and consult with the pain clinic. Because of lack of improvement, the patient was scheduled for L4-S1 posterior spinal decompression and L4-L5 posterior spinal instrumented fusion. Discussion The discussion will include the diagnosis of SEL, imaging appearance, its risk factors, etiology and management. Conclusion This case report describes a case of lumbar spinal stenosis due to SEL with neurological symptoms. Some risk factors have also been identified in the literature. MRI is considered as the reference standard for its diagnosis. The therapeutic approach of patients with SEL is not standardized. Thus, reporting and investigating the diagnostic process and treatment of this patient will positively contribute to better management for other future patients.