Spinal Instability Clinical Trial
— ARBORDOfficial title:
Comparative Study of Arthrodeses in One Time by "Single Posterior Approach" and Two-stage Arthrodeses by "Double Anterior and Posterior Approach"
NCT number | NCT03876275 |
Other study ID # | ARBORD |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date | September 11, 2023 |
Verified date | September 2023 |
Source | Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
Extended arthrodesis of the spine is indicated in the treatment of deformities. The principle of the intervention is to correct the spinal imbalance and to obtain a fusion of the vertebral segment operated in order to guarantee the durability of this correction, in order to guarantee a functional result the best possible one. There is a great disparity in the techniques available to obtain this result: as regards the correction of the deformation itself, it is possible to resort to various types of gestures aimed at "freeing" the spine to allow the getting the correction. It may be staged or transpedicular osteotomies or previous releases (staged discectomies). Regarding the arthrodesis itself, this can be obtained by an isolated posterior graft or by a circumferential graft itself performed in a time using interbody cages PLIF type (posterior lumbar interbody fusion) or TLIF (transforaminal interbody fusion) or in two stages by a complementary anterior graft. These are heavy interventions with a high complication rate. The choice of this or that technique is based on data from the literature and remains at the discretion of the surgeon who makes the surgical indication. However, it has never been possible to compare these different techniques in a prospective study. The few articles comparing the different techniques tend to show that there is no significant difference between the techniques with a higher complication rate for the two-step techniques. However, these are retrospective studies, with all the biases that this implies and despite these results the disparity in surgical indications remains substantial. The objective of this work is therefore to evaluate, according to an identical protocol, the different surgical techniques for the treatment of spinal deformities associated with a fusion in order to determine the morbidity associated with each of the techniques and if this morbidity is justified by a better functional result at a minimum follow-up of two years.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 193 |
Est. completion date | September 11, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | March 3, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patient whose age = 18 years - Patient operated on an arthrodesis including the sacrum and extending to T11 or greater - Francophone patient - Patient not opposing his participation in the research protocol Exclusion Criteria: - Patient under tutorship or curatorship - Patient deprived of liberty |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph | Paris |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Surgical revision rate | Surgical revision rate following double-approach techniques and single posterior approach techniques | year 2 | |
Secondary | duration of the procedure | duration of the procedure | Day 1 | |
Secondary | bleeding during the procedure | bleeding volume during the procedure | Day 1 | |
Secondary | quality of life questionnary Oswestry v2 | The quality of life questionnary Oswestry v2 before surgery corresponds to the score 0% -20%: Minimal disability; 21%-40%: Moderate Disability; 41%-60%: Severe Disability; 61%-80%: Crippling back pain and 81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or have an exaggeration of their symptoms. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | quality of life questionnary SF-12 | The quality of life questionnary SF-12 before surgery corresponds to a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Visual Analog Score for pain | The visual Analog Score for pain before surgery corresponds to a score between 0 to 10. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | quality of life questionnary Oswestry v2 | The quality of life questionnary Oswestry v2 one year after surgery corresponds to the score 0% -20%: Minimal disability; 21%-40%: Moderate Disability; 41%-60%: Severe Disability; 61%-80%: Crippling back pain and 81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or have an exaggeration of their symptoms. | year 1 | |
Secondary | quality of life questionnary SF-12 | The quality of life questionnary SF-12 one year after surgery to a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). | year 1 | |
Secondary | Visual Analog Score for pain | The pain evaluation with Visual analogue scale one year after surgery corresponds to a score between 0 to 10. | year 1 | |
Secondary | quality of life questionnary Oswestry v2 | The quality of life questionnary Oswestry v2 two years after surgery corresponds to the score 0% -20%: Minimal disability; 21%-40%: Moderate Disability; 41%-60%: Severe Disability; 61%-80%: Crippling back pain and 81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or have an exaggeration of their symptoms. | year 2 | |
Secondary | quality of life questionnary SF-12 | The quality of life questionnary SF-12 two years after surgery to a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). | year 2 | |
Secondary | Visual Analog Score for pain | The pain evaluation with Visual analogue scale two years after surgery corresponds to a score between 0 to 10. | year 2 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02435485 -
The Rehabilitation Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. A Prospective Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01982045 -
RCT of AttraX® Putty vs. Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05296889 -
Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05648474 -
Intraoperative Monitoring for the Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedure
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04176562 -
Prospective SPINE Registry
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT02427438 -
Home Program Education for Patients With Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05673291 -
Posture and Musculoskeletal Pain in Dentists
|
||
Completed |
NCT03321357 -
Retest-reliability and At-home-assessment Feasibility of the 5R-STS
|
||
Completed |
NCT04171544 -
Streamline Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT01918943 -
Evaluation of Aspen Spinous Process Fixation System and PLIF Technique for the Treatment of Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05633550 -
SPSI Validity and Test-Retest Reliability Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03593330 -
Neurosurgical Transitional Care Programme
|
N/A |