Clinical Trials Logo

Spinal Instability clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spinal Instability.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02427438 Withdrawn - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Home Program Education for Patients With Low Back Pain

Start date: February 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the effect size of the change in Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score over the 8 week follow-up period between the video based instruction or standard of care hand-out with pictures and written instructions for subjects meeting the clinical prediction rule for lumbar stabilization. The second purpose will be to determine if there is a subset of physical examination and self-reported variables that are associated with having a successful result (ODQ improvement by at least 6 points) and if the subset of variables are affected by whether or not the subject was in the intervention (video) or control (handout) group.

NCT ID: NCT01982045 Completed - Spinal Deformity Clinical Trials

RCT of AttraX® Putty vs. Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion

AxA
Start date: October 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of AttraX® Putty as a bone graft substitute for autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion of the thoracolumbar spine, in terms of efficacy and safety.

NCT ID: NCT01918943 Recruiting - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Aspen Spinous Process Fixation System and PLIF Technique for the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Start date: August 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Lumbar spinal fusion was introduced approximately 70 years ago and has evolved as a treatment option for symptomatic spinal instability, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative scoliosis. Many techniques evolved since then, from wiring, rods, pedicle screws, and recently inter-spinous fixation devices like the Aspen. Along its evolutionary trail, various methods for achieving circumferential fusion have arisen. Distinct from staged anterior/posterior fusion techniques, two methods of achieving an interbody fusion from a posterior approach have emerged: posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Recently, the lateral approach for interbody fusion (XLIF) has became a more common technique, requiring in some cases, complemental posterior fixation with pedicle screws, facet screws or interspinous fixation devices like the Aspen device. In this study, we address the clinical and radiological outcome of a novel technique using standard PLIF interbody fusion and insertion of the Aspen device via posterior lumbar approach.