Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of the investigators work is to establish how nerve transfers can be best used to improve upper extremity function in patients with cervical level spinal cord injury (SCI). The investigators' hypothesis is that nerve transfers are safe and effective and will improve function and quality of life in patients with loss of upper function due to spinal cord injury. The investigators plan on looking at upper limb function, and health-related quality of life in patients before and after surgery to better understand how patients benefit from these treatments. A nerve transfer procedure can be used to rewire the system to make some muscles work again following SCI. The nerve transfer procedure (which is done in the arm and not at the level of the spinal cord) can be used to bypass the damaged area and to deliver a signal from the brain to a muscle that became disconnected following that injury. A donor nerve is taken from another muscle whose use is not essential and then transferred to help in providing more a more critical function. For example, one type of nerve transfer is done to restore the lost ability to pinch or grasp small objects between the fingers that occurs in many patients with cervical SCI. In this surgery, a donor nerve that normally helps flex the elbow. This nerve can be used because the biceps muscle is also working to flex the elbow. This donor nerve is cut and re-attached to the nerve going to muscles in the forearm that provide pinch by bending the tips of the thumb and index finger. Because the nerve transfer procedure involves cutting and reattaching nerve and muscle tissues, time is required to regenerate working connections between the nerves and muscle as well as to allow the brain to relearn how to use and strengthen that muscle.


Clinical Trial Description

Background/Readiness Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life altering injury that results in profound loss of upper limb function. Nerve transfer surgery has transformed the field of peripheral nerve injury surgery, allowing remarkable restoration of upper limb motor function. The investigators expanded use of nerve transfer surgery to cervical SCI patients and are the first center to successfully restore volitional hand function in a patient with a C7 motor level injury (now 3 years post-surgery). Results in 7 more patients show early functional gains at 3-6 months post-surgery (most gains are expected at 12 months and these patients are still early in their course). The proposed study will obtain formative outcomes data from a pilot investigation of nerve transfer surgery to restore upper extremity function in patients with cervical SCI. Upper extremity and hand function is essential to basic activities of daily living and independence; patients with cervical SCI rate this as more important than walking and sexual performance. Restoration of critical upper extremity and hand function requires the unique expertise and technical skill of hand surgeons; traditionally tendon transfer/tenodesis are used. Although studies report reasonable outcomes in SCI patients for this procedure, use is limited particularly in the US. Nerve transfers offer an alternative and promising approach. In peripheral nerve injury, nerve transfers are well-established, safe and are often the treatment of choice. A nerve transfer uses an expendable donor nerve and coapts this to a nonfunctional recipient nerve to restore volitional motor function. Since a nerve transfer reinnervates the musculotendinous unit responsible for the absent but desired function, this procedure: 1) does not have the biomechanical limitations of tendon transfers; 2) can use expendable donor nerves whose muscles cannot be used for tendon transfer (i.e. the brachialis); and 3) a single donor nerve can provide more than one function via reinnervation of multiple muscles. Most importantly for SCI patient acceptability, nerve transfers do not require prolonged periods of immobilization; early resumption of activity is encouraged. Preliminary Data: Case reports offer early evidence that this novel application of nerve transfers may be a better alternative to tendon transfers in SCI. Based on our extensive experience with nerve transfers in peripheral nerve injury, we expect this approach will have a profound impact on improving function, independence and health-related quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study is to provide evidence on the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of nerve transfers in SCI patients via systematically collected data and to evaluate patients' perspective of the benefits and disadvantages of nerve transfers. These data are vital for patient selection, patient and surgeon education, and adaptation of this well-established technique to this unique and traditionally underserved patient population. Hypothesis and Approach: Hypothesis: Nerve transfers are safe, effective procedures that have a role in the treatment armamentarium of cervical SCI associated upper extremity dysfunction. Aim 1: To document the safety, time course and improvement (potential for nerve transfers to improve functional outcomes) by assessing pre and post-operative function. Aim 2: To evaluate the feasibility and suitability of nerve transfers through multidisciplinary evaluation, electrodiagnostic testing, ultrasound, and nerve specimen examination and correlation with the clinical outcome. Aim 3: To assess patient satisfaction with and acceptability for this treatment by use of semi-structured patient interviews. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01899664
Study type Interventional
Source Washington University School of Medicine
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date June 2012
Completion date October 2021

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT06321172 - Muscle and Bone Changes After 6 Months of FES Cycling N/A
Completed NCT03457714 - Guided Internet Delivered Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy for Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Trial
Recruiting NCT05484557 - Prevention of Thromboembolism Using Apixaban vs Enoxaparin Following Spinal Cord Injury N/A
Suspended NCT05542238 - The Effect of Acute Exercise on Cardiac Autonomic, Cerebrovascular, and Cognitive Function in Spinal Cord Injury N/A
Recruiting NCT05503316 - The Roll of Balance Confidence in Gait Rehabilitation in Persons With a Lesion of the Central Nervous System N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05506657 - Early Intervention to Promote Return to Work for People With Spinal Cord Injury N/A
Recruiting NCT04105114 - Transformation of Paralysis to Stepping Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03680872 - Restoring Motor and Sensory Hand Function in Tetraplegia Using a Neural Bypass System N/A
Completed NCT04221373 - Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in SCI Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation N/A
Completed NCT00116337 - Spinal Cord Stimulation to Restore Cough N/A
Completed NCT03898700 - Coaching for Caregivers of Children With Spinal Cord Injury N/A
Recruiting NCT04883463 - Neuromodulation to Improve Respiratory Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04881565 - Losing Balance to Prevent Falls After Spinal Cord Injury (RBT+FES) N/A
Completed NCT04864262 - Photovoice for Spinal Cord Injury to Prevent Falls N/A
Recruiting NCT04007380 - Psychosocial, Cognitive, and Behavioral Consequences of Sleep-disordered Breathing After SCI N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04544761 - Resilience in Persons Following Spinal Cord Injury
Completed NCT03220451 - Use of Adhesive Elastic Taping for the Therapy of Medium/Severe Pressure Ulcers in Spinal Cord Injured Patients N/A
Terminated NCT03170557 - Randomized Comparative Trial for Persistent Pain in Spinal Cord Injury: Acupuncture vs Aspecific Needle Skin Stimulation N/A
Recruiting NCT04811235 - Optical Monitoring With Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Spinal Cord Injury Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT04736849 - Epidural and Dorsal Root Stimulation in Humans With Spinal Cord Injury N/A